Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document C2005/193/19

    Case C-220/05: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Administratif de Lyon (France) by judgment of that court of 7 April 2005 in the case Jean Auroux and Others v Commune de Roanne — Intervener: Société d'équipement du département de la Loire

    OB C 193, 6.8.2005, p. 11–11 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    6.8.2005   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 193/11

    Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Administratif de Lyon (France) by judgment of that court of 7 April 2005 in the case Jean Auroux and Others v Commune de Roanne — Intervener: Société d'équipement du département de la Loire

    (Case C-220/05)

    (2005/C 193/19)

    Language of the case: French

    Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by judgment of the Tribunal Administratif de Lyon of 7 April 2005, received at the Court Registry on 19 May 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Jean Auroux and Others and Commune de Roanne — Intervener: Société d'équipement du département de la Loire, on the following questions:

    1.

    Does a contract under which one contracting authority engages a second contracting authority to carry out a development project for a purpose of general interest, pursuant to which contract that second contracting authority is to deliver works to the first which are intended to meet its needs, and at the end of which such of the other land and works as have not been disposed of to third parties vest automatically in the first contracting authority, constitute a public works contract within the meaning of Article 1 of Directive 93/37/EEC of 14 June 1993, (1) as amended?

    2.

    If the answer to question 1 is in the affirmative, is it necessary, in assessing the threshold of 500 000 000 special drawing rights imposed by Article 6 of the same directive, to take into account only the price paid in return for the delivery of the works to the contracting authority, or the sum of that price and the contributions paid, even if the latter are only partly allocated to the execution of those works, or the total value of the works, with assets not disposed of at the end of the contract vesting automatically in the first contracting authority and the latter then pursuing the execution of ongoing contracts and assuming the debts incurred by the second contracting authority?

    3.

    If the answer to both questions 1 and 2 is in the affirmative, can the first contracting authority, when entering into such a contract, dispense with the procedures for awarding public works contracts laid down in that directive, on the grounds that that contract can be awarded only to certain legal persons and that those same procedures will be applied by the second contracting authority when awarding its public works contracts?

    (1)  Council Directive 93/37/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts (OJ 1993 L 199, p. 54).

    Top