This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2005/093/54
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 3 February 2005 in Case T-172/03 Nicole Heurtaux v Commission of the European Communities (Officials — Refusal of promotion — Absence of statement of reasons — Comparative examination of merits — Action for annulment)
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 3 February 2005 in Case T-172/03 Nicole Heurtaux v Commission of the European Communities (Officials — Refusal of promotion — Absence of statement of reasons — Comparative examination of merits — Action for annulment)
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 3 February 2005 in Case T-172/03 Nicole Heurtaux v Commission of the European Communities (Officials — Refusal of promotion — Absence of statement of reasons — Comparative examination of merits — Action for annulment)
OB C 93, 16.4.2005, p. 27–27
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
16.4.2005 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 93/27 |
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
of 3 February 2005
in Case T-172/03 Nicole Heurtaux v Commission of the European Communities (1)
(Officials - Refusal of promotion - Absence of statement of reasons - Comparative examination of merits - Action for annulment)
(2005/C 93/54)
Language of the case: French
In Case T-172/03: Nicole Heurtaux, an official of the Commission of the European Communities, residing in Brussels (Belgium), represented by J.-N. Louis, É. Marchal, A. Coolen and S. Orlandi, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg, against Commission of the European Communities (Agents: by J. Curall and V. Joris, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — application for annulment of the Commission's decision of 14 August 2002 not to promote the applicant to Grade B 2 under the 2002 promotion exercise — the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed of P. Lindh, President, J.D. Cooke and D. Šváby, Judges; I. Natsinas, Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 3 February 2005, in which it:
|
1. |
Annuls the Commission's decision of 14 August 2002 not to promote the applicant to Grade B 2 under the 2002 promotion exercise. |
|
2. |
Orders the Commission to pay the costs. |