Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2005/093/15

    Case C-40/05: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Överklagandenämnden för högskolan by decision of that court of 1 February 2005 in Kaj Lyyski v Umeå universitet

    OB C 93, 16.4.2005, p. 8–8 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    16.4.2005   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 93/8


    Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Överklagandenämnden för högskolan by decision of that court of 1 February 2005 in Kaj Lyyski v Umeå universitet

    (Case C-40/05)

    (2005/C 93/15)

    Language of the case: Swedish

    Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by decision of the Överklagandenämnden för högskolan (Sweden) of 1 February 2005, received at the Court Registry on 3 February 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Kaj Lyyski and Umeå universitet on the following question:

    1.

    Does Community law, in particular Article 12 EC, prevent the imposition, on assessment of an applicant's eligibility for admission to teacher training intended in the short term to meet the need for qualified teachers in Sweden, of a requirement of employment in a Swedish school? Can such a requirement be considered justified and proportional?

    2.

    Does it make a difference to the answer to the first question if an applicant for the training course who is employed in a school in a Member State other than Sweden is a Swedish national or a national of another Member State?

    3.

    Does it make a difference to the answer to the first question if the teacher training is intended to be of limited duration or if the teacher involved is of a longer duration?


    Top