EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2004/251/29
Order of the Court of First Instance of 5 July 2004 in Case T-39/03 DaimlerChrysler AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of opposition — No need to adjudicate)
Order of the Court of First Instance of 5 July 2004 in Case T-39/03 DaimlerChrysler AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of opposition — No need to adjudicate)
Order of the Court of First Instance of 5 July 2004 in Case T-39/03 DaimlerChrysler AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of opposition — No need to adjudicate)
OB C 251, 9.10.2004, p. 16–16
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
9.10.2004 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 251/16 |
ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
of 5 July 2004
in Case T-39/03 DaimlerChrysler AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)
(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of opposition - No need to adjudicate)
(2004/C 251/29)
Language of the case: German
In Case T-39/03: DaimlerChrysler AG, established in Stuttgart (Germany), represented by N. Siebertz, lawyer, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agent: G. Schneider), the intervener before the Court of First Instance being Axon Leasing GmbH, established in Munich (Germany), represented by S. Lüft, lawyer — action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 November 2002 (Case R 329/2001-4) — the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of: J. Pirrung, President, N. J. Forwood and I. Pelikánová, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 5 July 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:
|
1. |
There is no need to adjudicate on the action; |
|
2. |
The applicant shall pay the costs. |