EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2004/251/28

Order of the Court of First Instance of 15 June 2004 in Case T-21/03: S v Commission of the European Communities (Officials — Action for annulment — Occupational illness — Recognition of illness as occupational in origin — Request for removal of certain documents from the file held by the medical committee — Refusal — Act adversely affecting an official — Manifest inadmissibility)

OB C 251, 9.10.2004, p. 16–16 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

9.10.2004   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 251/16


ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 15 June 2004

in Case T-21/03: S v Commission of the European Communities (1)

(Officials - Action for annulment - Occupational illness - Recognition of illness as occupational in origin - Request for removal of certain documents from the file held by the medical committee - Refusal - Act adversely affecting an official - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2004/C 251/28)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-21/03: S, a former official of the Commission of the European Communities, residing in Thessaloniki (Greece), represented by A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers, v Commission of the European Communities (Agents: J. Currall and F. Clotuche-Duvieusart, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — action for annulment of the Commission's decision of 11 March 2002 refusing to remove certain documents from the file held by the medical committee called upon to consider the applicant's request to have the illness from which she is suffering recognised as occupational in origin — the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed of P. Lindh, President, J. D. Cooke and D. Šváby, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 15 June 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

(1)

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

(2)

Each of the parties is ordered to bear its own costs.


(1)  OJ No C 83 of 5.4.2003.


Top