Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 92002E000976

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0976/02 by Ian Hudghton (Verts/ALE) to the Commission. French ban on imports of British beef.

OB C 205E, 29.8.2002, p. 240–240 (ES, DA, DE, EL, EN, FR, IT, NL, PT, FI, SV)

European Parliament's website

92002E0976

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0976/02 by Ian Hudghton (Verts/ALE) to the Commission. French ban on imports of British beef.

Official Journal 205 E , 29/08/2002 P. 0240 - 0240


WRITTEN QUESTION P-0976/02

by Ian Hudghton (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(4 April 2002)

Subject: French ban on imports of British beef

In view of the European Court of Justice ruling in September 2001 that France has failed to fulfil its Community obligations by continuing its ban on imports of British beef, and given the commercial losses being sustained by British producers as a result of this unilateral action, would the Commission please inform Members:

- What action it has taken thus far to lift the ban, given the ruling of the Court of Justice was given some six months ago?

- What reparation will be made to British beef producers in order to compensate for the illegal actions of the French?

Answer given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(26 April 2002)

The judgement of the European Court of Justice in case C-1/00 Commission v French Republic was dated 13 December 2001.

Soon after the judgement, the Commission requested France to communicate details of the actions it would be taking to ensure compliance. In the absence of a satisfactory reply, a letter of formal notice under Article 228(2) of the EC Treaty was sent to the French government on 21 March 2002.

The infringement procedure now opened by the Commission could lead, if pursued to its conclusion, to the Court of Justice awarding a lump sum or penalty payment against the French government. There is, however, no provision under Article 228(2) for compensation of individuals.

In respect of the case law of the court concerning a Member State's obligations to make good the damage caused to individuals by a breach of Community law for which it is responsible, the Honourable Member is referred to the Commission's answer to written question E-3625/01 of Mr Huhne(1).

(1) JO C 172 E, 18.7.2002, p. 99.

Top