This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62005CO0368
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 December 2006.#Polyelectrolyte Producers Group v Commission of the European Communities and Council of the European Union.#Appeal - Council decision determining the Community's position - Decision of the EEA Joint Committee permitting the Kingdom of Norway to apply more stringent specific concentration limits for acrylamide than those applicable in the Community.#Case C-368/05 P.
Определение на Съда (шести състав) от 8 декември 2006 г.
Polyelectrolyte Producers Group срещу Комисия на Европейските общности и Съвет на Европейския съюз.
Жалба - Решение на Съвета за приемане на позицията на Общността - Решение на Съвместния комитет на ЕИП, позволяващо на Кралство Норвегия да прилага по отношение на веществото акриламид по-ограничителни специфични гранични стойности на концентрация от разрешените в Общността.
Дело C-368/05 P.
Определение на Съда (шести състав) от 8 декември 2006 г.
Polyelectrolyte Producers Group срещу Комисия на Европейските общности и Съвет на Европейския съюз.
Жалба - Решение на Съвета за приемане на позицията на Общността - Решение на Съвместния комитет на ЕИП, позволяващо на Кралство Норвегия да прилага по отношение на веществото акриламид по-ограничителни специфични гранични стойности на концентрация от разрешените в Общността.
Дело C-368/05 P.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2006:771
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 December 2006 – Polyelectrolyte Producers Group v Council and Commission
(Case C‑368/05 P)
Appeal – Council decision determining the Community’s position – Decision of the EEA Joint Committee permitting the Kingdom of Norway to apply more stringent specific concentration limits for acrylamide than those applicable in the Community
1. Procedure – Obligation of the Court of First Instance to open the oral procedure before ruling on an objection of inadmissibility – None (Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, Art. 114(1) to (3)) (see para. 46)
2. Actions for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Measures of direct and individual concern to them (Art. 230, fourth para., EC) (see paras 56-60, 67)
3. Appeal – Grounds – Error of law pleaded not identified – Inadmissible (Art. 225 EC; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para., Rules of Procedure of the Court, Art. 112(1)(c)) (see para. 62)
Re:
| Appeal against the order of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 22 July 2005 in Case T-376/04 | Polyelectrolyte Producers Group | v | Council and Commission | , which declared inadmissible an action for, first, annulment of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 59/2004 of 26 April 2004 amending Annex II to the EEA Agreement (OJ 2004 L 277, p. 30) permitting Norway to apply more stringent concentration limits for acrylamide than those applicable in the Community, and also a declaration that the joint statement relating to the EEA Agreement regarding the review clauses in the field of dangerous substances, adopted at the meeting of the Joint Committee on 26 March 1999 (OJ 1999 C 185, p. 6), is unlawful and, second, an action for damages to obtain compensation for the loss allegedly suffered by the applicant following the adoption of the contested decision. |
Operative part
|
1. |
The appeal is dismissed; |
|
2. |
Polyelectrolyte Producers Group is ordered to pay the costs. |