This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62003TJ0032
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 8 March 2005. # Leder & Schuh AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). # Community mark. # Case T-32/03.
Решение на Първоинстанционния съд (втори състав) от 8 март 2005 г.
Leder & Schuh AG срещу Служба за хармонизация във вътрешния пазар (марки и дизайни) (СХВП).
Марка на Общността.
Дело T-32/03.
Решение на Първоинстанционния съд (втори състав) от 8 март 2005 г.
Leder & Schuh AG срещу Служба за хармонизация във вътрешния пазар (марки и дизайни) (СХВП).
Марка на Общността.
Дело T-32/03.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2005:82
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 8 March 2005 − Leder & Schuh v OHIM – Schuhpark Fascies (JELLO SCHUHPARK)
(Case T-32/03)
Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Earlier national word mark ‘Schuhpark’ – Application for Community word mark ‘JELLO SCHUHPARK’ – Relative ground for refusal – Partial refusal to register – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94
Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Word Marks JELLO SCHUHPARK and Schuhpark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see para. 51)
Re:
ACTION against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 November 2002, in the corrected version of 9 December 2002 (Case R 494/1999-3), relating to opposition proceedings between Schuhpark Fascies GmbH and Leder & Schuh AG. |
Information relating to the case
Applicant for the Community trade mark: |
Leder & Schuh AG |
Community trade mark sought: |
The word mark ‘JELLO SCHUHPARK’ for goods in Classes 18, 25 and 28 – Application No 107367 |
Proprietor of mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: |
Schuhpark Fascies GmbH |
Mark or sign cited in opposition: |
German word mark ‘Schuhpark’ for goods in Class 25 |
Decision of the Opposition Division |
Dismissal of the applicant’s application for goods in Class 18. Dismissal of the opposition as to the remainder |
Decision of the Board of Appeal: |
Dismissal of the appeal brought by the applicant |
Operative part
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the application; |
2. |
Orders the applicant to bear the costs. |