This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62001CJ0378
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 March 2003. # Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic. # Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 79/409/EEC - Special protection areas - Conservation of wild birds. # Case C-378/01.
Решение на Съда (шести състав) от 20 март 2003 г.
Комисия на Европейските общности срещу Италианска република.
Неизпълнение на задължения от държава-членка - Директива 79/409/ЕИО.
Дело C-378/01.
Решение на Съда (шести състав) от 20 март 2003 г.
Комисия на Европейските общности срещу Италианска република.
Неизпълнение на задължения от държава-членка - Директива 79/409/ЕИО.
Дело C-378/01.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2003:176
«(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 79/409/EEC – Special protection areas – Conservation of wild birds)»
|
I - 0000 | |||
|
I - 0000 | |||
(Council Directive 79/409, Art. 4(1) and (2))
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber)
20 March 2003 (1)
((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 79/409/EEC – Special protection areas – Conservation of wild birds))
In Case C-378/01, Commission of the European Communities, represented by G. Valero Jordana and R. Amorosi, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg,applicant,
v
Italian Republic, represented by U. Leanza, acting as Agent, and M. Fiorilli, avvocato dello Stato, with an address for service in Luxembourg,defendant,
APPLICATION for a declaration that, by failing to classify as special protection areas the most suitable territories, in number and size, for the protection of those species mentioned in Annex I to Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds (OJ 1979 L 103, p. 1), as subsequently amended, and of the other migratory species which regularly occur in Italy, and by failing to send to the Commission all necessary information relevant to most of the said areas classified by it, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 4(1) to (3) of that directive,THE COURT (Sixth Chamber),,
having regard to the Report for the Hearing,
after hearing oral argument from the parties at the hearing on 14 November 2002, at which the Commission was represented by R. Amorosi and the Italian Republic by A. Cingolo, avvocato dello Stato,after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 12 December 2002,
gives the following
On those grounds,
THE COURT (Sixth Chamber)
hereby:
Puissochet |
Schintgen |
Gulmann |
Macken |
Colneric |
|
R. Grass |
J.-P. Puissochet |
Registrar |
President of the Sixth Chamber |