This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62001CJ0361
Judgment of the Court of 9 September 2003.#Christina Kik v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).#Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 115 - Rules in force governing languages at the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) - Plea of illegality - Principle of non-discrimination.#Case C-361/01 P.
Решение на Съда от 9 септември 2003 г.
Christina Kik срещу Служба за хармонизация във вътрешния пазар (марки и дизайни) (СХВП).
Регламент (ЕО) № 40/94 - Член 115.
Дело C-361/01 P.
Решение на Съда от 9 септември 2003 г.
Christina Kik срещу Служба за хармонизация във вътрешния пазар (марки и дизайни) (СХВП).
Регламент (ЕО) № 40/94 - Член 115.
Дело C-361/01 P.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2003:434
«(Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – Article 115 – Rules in force governing languages at the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) – Plea of illegality – Principle of non-discrimination)»
|
||||
|
||||
(Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 115(4))
(Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 115(3))
(Art. 253 EC; Council Regulation No 40/94)
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
9 September 2003 (1)
((Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – Article 115 – Rules in force governing languages at the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) – Plea of illegality – Principle of non-discrimination))
In Case C-361/01 P, Christina Kik, represented by E.H. Pijnacker Hordijk and S.B. Noë, advocaaten, with an address for service in Luxembourg,appellant,
APPEAL against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities in Case T-120/99 Kik v OHIM [2001] ECR II-2235, seeking to have that judgment set aside, the other parties to the proceedings being: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), represented by A. von Mühlendahl, O. Montalto and J. Miranda de Sousa, acting as Agents,defendant at first instance supported byCommission of the European Communities, represented by W. Wils and N. Rasmussen, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg,intervener on appeal Hellenic Republic, represented by K. Samoni-Rantou and S. Vodina, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg,Kingdom of Spain, represented by S. Ortiz Vaamonde, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg,andCouncil of the European Union, represented by G. Houttuin and A. Lo Monaco, acting as Agents,interveners at first instance,
THE COURT,,
having regard to the Report for the Hearing,
after hearing oral argument from the parties at the hearing on 26 November 2002, at which Ms Kik was represented by E.H. Pijnacker Hordijk, the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) by A. von Mühlendahl, J. Miranda de Sousa and S. Bonne, acting as Agent, the Council by G. Houttuin and A. Lo Monaco and the Commission by W. Wils,after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 20 March 2002,
gives the following
On those grounds,
THE COURT
hereby:
Rodríguez Iglesias |
Puissochet |
Wathelet |
Schintgen |
Timmermans |
Gulmann |
Edward |
La Pergola |
Jann |
Skouris |
Macken |
Colneric |
von Bahr |
Cunha Rodrigues |
Rosas |
R. Grass |
C.G. Rodríguez |
Registrar |
President of the Fifth Chamber |