This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62001CJ0075
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 February 2003. # Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxemburg. # Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 92/43/EEC - Conservation of natural habitats - Wild fauna and flora. # Case C-75/01.
Решение на Съда (шести състав) от 13 февруари 2003 г.
Комисия на Европейските общности срещу Великото херцогство Люксембург.
Неизпълнение на задължения от държава-членка - Директива 92/43/ЕИО.
Дело C-75/01.
Решение на Съда (шести състав) от 13 февруари 2003 г.
Комисия на Европейските общности срещу Великото херцогство Люксембург.
Неизпълнение на задължения от държава-членка - Директива 92/43/ЕИО.
Дело C-75/01.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2003:95
«(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 92/43/EEC – Conservation of natural habitats – Wild fauna and flora)»
|
I - 0000 | |||
|
I - 0000 | |||
(Art. 249 EC, third para.)
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber)
13 February 2003 (1)
((Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations – Directive 92/43/EEC – Conservation of natural habitats – Wild fauna and flora))
In Case C-75/01, Commission of the European Communities, represented by R.B. Wainwright and J. Adda, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg,applicant,
v
Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, represented by J. Faltz, acting as Agent,defendant,
APPLICATION for a declaration that, by failing to take all the necessary measures to implement fully and correctly Articles 1, 4(5), 5(4), 6, 7, 12(1)(b) and (c), 12(2), 12(4), 13(1)(b) and 13(2), 14, 15, 16(1), 22(b) and (c), and 23(2) of Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (OJ 1992 L 206, p. 7) in conjunction with Annexes I, II, IV, V and VI to that directive, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under the directive and under the third paragraph of Article 249 EC,THE COURT (Sixth Chamber),,
having regard to the report of the Judge-Rapporteur,
after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 29 January 2002,
gives the following
On those grounds,
THE COURT (Sixth Chamber),
hereby:
Puissochet |
Gulmann |
Skouris |
Macken |
Colneric |
|
R. Grass |
J.-P. Puissochet |
Registrar |
President of the Sixth Chamber |