Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62021CO0305

    Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 31 March 2022.
    João Miguel Barata v European Parliament.
    Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials – Article 45a of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Certification procedure – 2017 promotion exercise – Exclusion from the final list of officials entitled to take part in the training programme – Notice of competition – Obligation to include a list of annexes with the application form – Non-compliance – Rejection of the application – Principle of sound administration – Proportionality – Regulation No 1 – Rules on languages.
    Case C-305/21 P.

    Court reports – general

    ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2022:253

     Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 31 March 2022 – Barata v Parliament

    (Case C‑305/21 P) ( 1 )

    (Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials – Article 45a of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Certification procedure – 2017 promotion exercise – Exclusion from the final list of officials entitled to take part in the training programme – Notice of competition – Obligation to include a list of annexes with the application form – Non-compliance – Rejection of the application – Principle of sound administration – Proportionality – Regulation No 1 – Rules on languages)

    1. 

    Appeal – Pleas in law – Plea raised for the first time in the context of the appeal – Inadmissibility

    (Art. 256(1), second para., TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 170(1))

    (see paras 7 [4], 8)

    2. 

    Officials – Certification procedure – Conditions for admission – Fixing by the competition notice – Requirement to provide supporting documents – No warning from the administration concerning a candidate’s missing documents – Breach of duty to have regard for the welfare of staff and of the principle of sound administration – Absence

    (Staff Regulations, Art. 45a)

    (see paras 7 [15-20], 8)

    3. 

    Officials – Certification procedure – Conditions for admission – Fixing by the competition notice – Administration's discretion – Judicial review – Limits – Requirement to include a list of annexes, failing which the application would be rejected – Breach of principle of proportionality – None

    (Staff Regulations, Art. 45a)

    (see paras 7 [28-30, 33-35], 8)

    4. 

    European Union – Rules on languages – Regulation No 1 – Scope – Relations between the institutions and their staff – Included in the absence of specific regulations

    (Council Regulation No 1, Arts 1 and 6)

    (see paras 7 [38], 8)

    5. 

    European Union – Rules on languages – Regulation No 1 – Scope – Candidates taking part in an external competition – Included – Candidates taking part in an internal competition – Not included – No breach of the principle of equal treatment

    (Council Regulation No 1, Arts 1 and 6)

    (see paras 7 [42, 43], 8)

    6. 

    Officials – Certification procedure – Notice of competition – No obligation to publish in all the official languages of the European Union – Discrimination based on language – Whether permissible – Conditions

    (Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 21; Staff Regulations, Art. 1d(6) and 45a and Annex III, Art. 1(2); Council Regulation No 1, Art. 5)

    (see paras 7 [51, 52], 8)

    Operative part

    1. 

    The appeal is dismissed as in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.

    2. 

    Mr João Miguel Barata shall bear his own costs.


    ( 1 ) OJ C 207, 23.5.2022.

    Top