This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2006/331/93
Case T-290/05: Order of the Court of First Instance of 11 December 2006 — Weber v Commission (Access to documents of the Community institutions — Refusal — Application initiating proceedings — Manifest inadmissibility — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-290/05: Order of the Court of First Instance of 11 December 2006 — Weber v Commission (Access to documents of the Community institutions — Refusal — Application initiating proceedings — Manifest inadmissibility — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-290/05: Order of the Court of First Instance of 11 December 2006 — Weber v Commission (Access to documents of the Community institutions — Refusal — Application initiating proceedings — Manifest inadmissibility — No need to adjudicate)
OB C 331, 30.12.2006, p. 42–42
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 30/12/2006; дата на публикуване
- Author:
- Първоинстанционен съд
- Form:
- Съдебна информация
- Link
- Link
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Link
|
30.12.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 331/42 |
Order of the Court of First Instance of 11 December 2006 — Weber v Commission
(Case T-290/05) (1)
(Access to documents of the Community institutions - Refusal - Application initiating proceedings - Manifest inadmissibility - No need to adjudicate)
(2006/C 331/93)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Friedrich Weber (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: W. Declair, lawyer)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: P. Costa de Oliveira and C. Ladenburger, Agents)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Secretariat-General of the Commission of 27 May 2005, rejecting the request for access by the applicant to a letter sent by the Directorate General for Competition to the Federal German Government concerning State aid proceedings.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible; |
|
2. |
The applicant is ordered to bear its own costs and those incurred by the Commission. |
