This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2006/249/03
Case C-300/06: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 6 July 2006 — Ursula Voß v Land Berlin, Other party to the proceedings: The representative of the national interest at the Bundesverwaltungsgericht
Case C-300/06: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 6 July 2006 — Ursula Voß v Land Berlin, Other party to the proceedings: The representative of the national interest at the Bundesverwaltungsgericht
Case C-300/06: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 6 July 2006 — Ursula Voß v Land Berlin, Other party to the proceedings: The representative of the national interest at the Bundesverwaltungsgericht
OB C 249, 14.10.2006, p. 2–2
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 14/10/2006; дата на публикуване
- Author:
- Съд
- Form:
- Съдебна информация
- Link
- Link
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Link
|
14.10.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 249/2 |
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 6 July 2006 — Ursula Voß v Land Berlin, Other party to the proceedings: The representative of the national interest at the Bundesverwaltungsgericht
(Case C-300/06)
(2006/C 249/03)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Bundesverwaltungsgericht
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Ursula Voß
Defendant: Land Berlin
Other party to the proceedings: The representative of the national interest at the Bundesverwaltungsgericht
Question referred
Does Article 141 EC preclude national legislation under which remuneration for additional work which takes place outside of normal working hours is paid at the same rate with regard to full-time as well as part-time public servants and that rate is lower than the pro-rata remuneration allotted to full-time public servants as regards a period of equal length within normal working hours if it is predominantly women who are employed part-time?
