Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document C2006/074/55

Case T-17/06: Action brought on 23 January 2006 — Giant (China) v Council

OB C 74, 25.3.2006, p. 29–30 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

Date of document:
25/03/2006; дата на публикуване
Author:
Първоинстанционен съд
Form:
Съдебна информация

25.3.2006   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 74/29

Action brought on 23 January 2006 — Giant (China) v Council

(Case T-17/06)

(2006/C 74/55)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Giant (China) Co., Ltd (Kunshan City, China) [represented by: P. De Baere, lawyer]

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

—

Annul Council Regulation (EC) No 1892/2005 (1) of 14 November 2005 terminating the partial interim review of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of bicycles originating in the People's Republic of china, insofar as

—

it rejects the applicant's market economy status (‘MES’) claim;

—

it violates Article 253 EC inasmuch as it fails to state the reasons for which the applicant's MES claim was rejected; and

—

it breaches the WTO law by applying post factum market economy criteria to Chinese exporting producers ion some EC Member States; and

—

order the Council to bear the costs of these proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant, a limited company incorporated under Chinese law, mainly produces bicycles and parts thereof, exporting to the Community. It contests Regulation 1892/2005 which terminated the partial interim review of the anti-dumping measures applicable on imports of bicycles originating in the People's Republic of China.

In support of its application, the applicant invokes first of all the same allegations of violation of Council Regulation 384/96 (‘the basic regulation’) and of Article 253 EC it had previously invoked in the context of Case T-372/05 (2).

The applicant further alleges that the contested Regulation breaches World Trade Organisation (‘WTO’) law in that it applies market economy criteria to Chinese exporters in five Member States whose anti-dumping legislation did not provide for such criteria at the time of China's accession to the WTO.

(1)  OJ L 302, 19/11/2005, p. 22.

(2)  OJ C 315, 10/12/2005, p. 17.

Top