This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2006/022/23
Case T-3/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 24 November 2005 — Simonds Farsons Cisk v OHIM (Community trade mark — Opposition procedure — Application for registration of a Community figurative mark containing the verbal element KINJI by SPA — Earlier Community word mark KINNIE — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 73 of Regulation No 40/94)
Case T-3/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 24 November 2005 — Simonds Farsons Cisk v OHIM (Community trade mark — Opposition procedure — Application for registration of a Community figurative mark containing the verbal element KINJI by SPA — Earlier Community word mark KINNIE — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 73 of Regulation No 40/94)
Case T-3/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 24 November 2005 — Simonds Farsons Cisk v OHIM (Community trade mark — Opposition procedure — Application for registration of a Community figurative mark containing the verbal element KINJI by SPA — Earlier Community word mark KINNIE — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 73 of Regulation No 40/94)
OB C 22, 28.1.2006, p. 12–12
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 28/01/2006; дата на публикуване
- Author:
- Първоинстанционен съд
- Form:
- Съдебна информация
- Link
- Link
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Link
|
28.1.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 22/12 |
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 24 November 2005 — Simonds Farsons Cisk v OHIM
(Case T-3/04) (1)
(Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Application for registration of a Community figurative mark containing the verbal element ‘KINJI by SPA’ - Earlier Community word mark KINNIE - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 73 of Regulation No 40/94)
(2006/C 22/23)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant(s): Simonds Farsons Cisk plc (Mrieħel, Malta) (represented by: M. Bagnall, I. Wood, Solicitor, and R. Hacon, Barrister)
Defendant(s): Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)
Other party or parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the Court of First Instance: Spa Monopole, compagnie fermière de Spa SA/NV (Spa, Belgium) (represented by: L. de Brouwer, E. Cornu, É. De Gryse and D. Moreau, lawyers)
Application for
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 November 2003 (Case R 996/2002-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Simonds Farsons Cisk plc and Spa Monopole, compagnie fermière de Spa SA/NV
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
