This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2005/296/53
Joined Cases T-295/04 to T-297/04: Order of the Court of First Instance of 8 September 2005 — ASAJA and Others v Council (Action for annulment — Regulation (EC) No 864/2004 — Support scheme in the olive oil sector — Natural and legal persons — Lack of individual concern — Inadmissibility)
Joined Cases T-295/04 to T-297/04: Order of the Court of First Instance of 8 September 2005 — ASAJA and Others v Council (Action for annulment — Regulation (EC) No 864/2004 — Support scheme in the olive oil sector — Natural and legal persons — Lack of individual concern — Inadmissibility)
Joined Cases T-295/04 to T-297/04: Order of the Court of First Instance of 8 September 2005 — ASAJA and Others v Council (Action for annulment — Regulation (EC) No 864/2004 — Support scheme in the olive oil sector — Natural and legal persons — Lack of individual concern — Inadmissibility)
OB C 296, 26.11.2005, p. 24–25
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
26.11.2005 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 296/24 |
Order of the Court of First Instance of 8 September 2005 — ASAJA and Others v Council
(Joined Cases T-295/04 to T-297/04) (1)
(Action for annulment - Regulation (EC) No 864/2004 - Support scheme in the olive oil sector - Natural and legal persons - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility)
(2005/C 296/53)
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicant(s): Centro Provincial de Jóvenes Agricultores de Jaén (ASAJA), Salvador Contreras Gila, José Ramiro López, Antonio Ramiro López, Cristóbal Gallego Martínez, Benito García Burgos and Antonio Rarras Rosa (Jaén, Spain) (represented by: J. Vásquez Medina, lawyer)
Defendant(s): Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Balta and F. Florindo Gijón, Agents)
Application for
annulment of Article 1(7) of Council Regulation (EC) No 864/2004 of 29 April 2004 amending Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers, and adapting it by reason of the accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia to the European Union.
Operative part of the Order
1. |
The actions are dismissed as inadmissible. |
2. |
The applicants will bear their own costs and those of the Council. |
3. |
It is not necessary to adjudicate on the application to intervene lodged by the Commission. |