Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2005/082/01

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 January 2005 in Case C-422/02 P: Europe Chemi-Con (Deutschland) GmbH v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities (Appeal — Anti-dumping measures — Regulation terminating anti-dumping proceedings — Retroactivity — Equal treatment — Non-discrimination — Imports of certain large aluminium electrolytic capacitors from Japan)

OB C 82, 2.4.2005, p. 1–1 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

2.4.2005   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/1


JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(First Chamber)

of 27 January 2005

in Case C-422/02 P: Europe Chemi-Con (Deutschland) GmbH v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities (1)

(Appeal - Anti-dumping measures - Regulation terminating anti-dumping proceedings - Retroactivity - Equal treatment - Non-discrimination - Imports of certain large aluminium electrolytic capacitors from Japan)

(2005/C 82/01)

Language of the case: English

In Case C-422/02 P: appeal under Article 49 of the EC Statute of the Court of Justice, brought on 21 November 2002, Europe Chemi-Con (Deutschland) GmbH, established in Nuremberg (Germany), (Lawyers: K. Adamantopoulos, J. Branton, and J. Gutiérrez Gisbert) the other parties to the proceedings being: Council of the European Union (Agent: S. Marquardt and G. Berrisch) and Commission of the European Communities (Agents: T. Scharf and S. Meany) – the Court (First Chamber), composed of P. Jann, President of the Chamber, A. Rosas (Rapporteur) and S. von Bahr, Judges; F.G. Jacobs, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 27 January 2005, in which it:

1.

Dismisses the appeal.

2.

Orders Europe Chemi-Con (Deutschland) GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union in these proceedings.

3.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to bear its own costs.


(1)  OJ C 19 of 25.01.2003.


Top