Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62023TN0074

    Case T-74/23: Action brought on 15 February 2023 — Oriflame Cosmetics v EUIPO — Caramé Holding (Representation of a stylised O)

    OJ C 121, 3.4.2023, p. 12–12 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    3.4.2023   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 121/12

    Action brought on 15 February 2023 — Oriflame Cosmetics v EUIPO — Caramé Holding (Representation of a stylised O)

    (Case T-74/23)

    (2023/C 121/16)

    Language in which the application was lodged: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Oriflame Cosmetics AG (Schaffhausen, Switzerland) (represented by: N. Gerling and U. Pfleghar, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Caramé Holding AG (Sulzbach, Germany)

    Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

    Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

    Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of a figurative mark (Representation of a stylised O) — International registration designating the European Union No 1 303 496

    Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

    Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 December 2022 in Case R 938/2022-2

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    annul the contested decision and the decision of the Opposition Division of EUIPO of 4 April 2022 and refuse international registration designating the European Union No 1 303 496;

    —

    Order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs incurred by the applicant in addition to bearing their own costs.

    Pleas in law

    —

    Infringement of Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2007/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

    —

    Infringement of Article 10(2) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.
    Top