Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62023TN0073

    Case T-73/23: Action brought on 16 February 2023 — Tertianum v EUIPO — DPF (TERTIANUM)

    OJ C 121, 3.4.2023, p. 11–12 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    3.4.2023   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 121/11

    Action brought on 16 February 2023 — Tertianum v EUIPO — DPF (TERTIANUM)

    (Case T-73/23)

    (2023/C 121/15)

    Language in which the application was lodged: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Tertianum AG (Dübendorf, Switzerland) (represented by: S. Fröhlich, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: DPF AG (Berlin, Germany)

    Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

    Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

    Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark TERTIANUM — International registration designating the European Union No 1 305 367

    Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

    Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 November 2022 in Case R 1706/2021-4

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    annul the contested decision;

    —

    order EUIPO to pay the costs.

    Plea in law

    —

    Infringement of Article 47(2) and (3) read in conjunction with Article 8(2)(a)(iii) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
    Top