This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62023CN0106
Case C-106/23 P: Appeal brought on 22 February 2023 by Patrick Vanhoudt against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 14 December 2022 in Case T-490/21, Vanhoudt v EIB
Case C-106/23 P: Appeal brought on 22 February 2023 by Patrick Vanhoudt against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 14 December 2022 in Case T-490/21, Vanhoudt v EIB
Case C-106/23 P: Appeal brought on 22 February 2023 by Patrick Vanhoudt against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 14 December 2022 in Case T-490/21, Vanhoudt v EIB
OJ C 189, 30.5.2023, p. 14–15
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
30.5.2023 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 189/14 |
Appeal brought on 22 February 2023 by Patrick Vanhoudt against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 14 December 2022 in Case T-490/21, Vanhoudt v EIB
(Case C-106/23 P)
(2023/C 189/20)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: Patrick Vanhoudt (represented by: L. Levi and A. Champetier, avocates)
Other party to the proceedings: European Investment Bank
Form of order sought
The appellant claims that the Court should:
— |
set aside the judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2022 in Case T-490/21; |
— |
consequently, grant the appellant the form of order sought at first instance and, accordingly
|
— |
order the defendant to pay all the costs of both proceedings. |
Grounds of appeal and main arguments
In support of the appeal, the appellant relies on the following grounds:
1. |
Breach of the Practice Directions and of the procedure — Breach of the court’s duty to state reasons — Error in the legal qualification of the vacancy notice –Breach of the principle of non-discrimination. |
2. |
Breach of the principle of legal certainty, transparency and non-discrimination — Breach of the court’s duty to state reasons. |