This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022TN0665
Case T-665/22: Action brought on 1 November 2022 — SkinIdent v EUIPO — Beiersdorf (NIVEA SKIN-IDENTICAL Q10)
Case T-665/22: Action brought on 1 November 2022 — SkinIdent v EUIPO — Beiersdorf (NIVEA SKIN-IDENTICAL Q10)
Case T-665/22: Action brought on 1 November 2022 — SkinIdent v EUIPO — Beiersdorf (NIVEA SKIN-IDENTICAL Q10)
OJ C 472, 12.12.2022, p. 49–49
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
12.12.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 472/49 |
Action brought on 1 November 2022 — SkinIdent v EUIPO — Beiersdorf (NIVEA SKIN-IDENTICAL Q10)
(Case T-665/22)
(2022/C 472/57)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: SkinIdent AG (Freienbach, Switzerland) (represented by: U. Hildebrandt, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Beiersdorf AG (Hamburg, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark NIVEA SKIN-IDENTICAL Q10 — Application for registration No 18 041 739
Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 August 2022 in Case R 1499/2021-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision and the decision of the Opposition Division of 1 July 2021 in Case B 3 091 527; |
|
— |
order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
|
— |
Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |