This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022TN0609
Case T-609/22: Action brought on 30 September 2022 — Nienaber v EUIPO — St. Hippolyt Mühle Ebert (BoneKare)
Case T-609/22: Action brought on 30 September 2022 — Nienaber v EUIPO — St. Hippolyt Mühle Ebert (BoneKare)
Case T-609/22: Action brought on 30 September 2022 — Nienaber v EUIPO — St. Hippolyt Mühle Ebert (BoneKare)
OJ C 441, 21.11.2022, p. 26–26
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
21.11.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 441/26 |
Action brought on 30 September 2022 — Nienaber v EUIPO — St. Hippolyt Mühle Ebert (BoneKare)
(Case T-609/22)
(2022/C 441/35)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Andreas Nienaber (Cloppenburg, Germany) (represented by: J. Eberhardt, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: St. Hippolyt Mühle Ebert GmbH (Dielheim, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark BoneKare — EU trade mark No 10 055 903
Proceedings before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 August 2022 in Case R 436/2022-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those incurred in the proceedings before the Cancellation Division of the defendant and its Board of Appeal. |
Pleas in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
|
— |
Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
|
— |
Infringement of the second sentence of Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |