Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62021CN0416

Case C-416/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bayerisches Oberstes Landesgericht (Germany) lodged on 7 July 2021 — Landkreis A.-F. v J. Sch. Omnibusunternehmen and K. Reisen GmbH

OJ C 431, 25.10.2021, pp. 7–8 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

25.10.2021   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 431/7


Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bayerisches Oberstes Landesgericht (Germany) lodged on 7 July 2021 — Landkreis A.-F. v J. Sch. Omnibusunternehmen and K. Reisen GmbH

(Case C-416/21)

(2021/C 431/05)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bayerisches Oberstes Landesgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Landkreis A.-F.

Respondents: J. Sch. Omnibusunternehmen, K. Reisen GmbH

Intervener: E. GmbH & Co. KG

Questions referred

1.

Is Article 57(4)(d) of Directive 2014/24/EU (1) to be interpreted as meaning that the contracting authority must have sufficiently plausible indications to conclude that the economic operator has infringed Article 101 TFEU?

2.

Is Article 57(4) of Directive 2014/24/EU to be interpreted as exhaustively regulating the optional grounds for exclusion in the sense that the principle of equal treatment (Article 18(1) of that directive) cannot preclude the award of a contract where tenders are submitted that are neither independent nor autonomous?

3.

Is Article 18(1) of Directive 2014/24/EU to be interpreted as precluding the award of a contract to undertakings which constitute an economic unit and have each submitted a tender?


(1)  Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC (OJ 2014 L 94, p. 65).


Top