Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62008CO0129

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 June 2009.
Carlos Cloet and Jacqueline Cloet v West-Vlaamse Intercommunale voor Economische Expansie, Huisvestingsbeleid en Technische Bijstand CVBA (WVI).
Reference for a preliminary ruling: Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Brugge - Belgium.
Reference for a preliminary ruling - No need to reply.
Case C-129/08.

European Court Reports 2009 I-00096*

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2009:347





Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 June 2009 – Carlos Cloet and Jacqueline Cloet v West-Vlaamse Intercommunale voor Economische Expansie, Huisvestingsbeleid en Technische Bijstand

(Case C‑129/08)

Reference for a preliminary ruling – No need to reply

Preliminary rulings – Reference to the Court – National court unable to provide clarification required by the Court since the case is no longer before it by reason of an appeal brought against the order for reference – No need to adjudicate (Art. 234 EC) (see paras 9-11)

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rechtbank van eerste aanleg Brugge – State aid – Definition – Interpretation of Articles 87(1) and 88(3) EC – Sale of a plot of land by an intercommunal organisation to an undertaking active in Benelux on preferential terms, following a compulsory purchase order – Whether or not obligation to notify exists.

Operative part

There is no need to reply to the reference for a preliminary ruling in Case C‑129/08.

Top