This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62002TJ0085
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 4 November 2003. # Pedro Díaz, SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). # Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Application for Community word mark CASTILLO - Earlier national figurative mark EL CASTILLO - Likelihood of confusion - Similar marks already on the relevant market. # Case T-85/02.
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 4 November 2003.
Pedro Díaz, SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Application for Community word mark CASTILLO - Earlier national figurative mark EL CASTILLO - Likelihood of confusion - Similar marks already on the relevant market.
Case T-85/02.
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 4 November 2003.
Pedro Díaz, SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Application for Community word mark CASTILLO - Earlier national figurative mark EL CASTILLO - Likelihood of confusion - Similar marks already on the relevant market.
Case T-85/02.
European Court Reports 2003 II-04835
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2003:288
«(Community trade mark – Opposition procedure – Application for Community word mark CASTILLO – Earlier national figurative mark EL CASTILLO – Likelihood of confusion – Similar marks already on the relevant market)»
|
||||
(Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b))
(Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b))
(Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b))
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Second Chamber)
4 November 2003 (1)
((Community trade mark – Opposition procedure – Application for Community word mark CASTILLO – Earlier national figurative mark EL CASTILLO – Likelihood of confusion – Similar marks already on the relevant market))
In Case T-85/02, Pedro Díaz, SA, established in Cartagena (Spain), represented initially by P. Koch Moreno and subsequently by M. Aznar Alonso, lawyers,applicant,
v
Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), represented by O. Montalto and J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents,defendant,
the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)(OHIM) beingGranjas Castelló, SA, established in Mollerussa (Spain),ACTION brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 16 January 2002 (Case R 40/2000-3) concerning the opposition filed by the owner of the national trade mark EL CASTILLO,THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (Second Chamber),
having regard to the application lodged at the Court Registry on 22 March 2002,having regard to the response of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) lodged at the Court Registry on 16 July 2002,further to the hearing on 11 June 2003,
gives the following
On those grounds,
THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Second Chamber)
hereby:
Forwood |
Pirrung |
Meij |
H. Jung |
N.J. Forwood |
Registrar |
President |