This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022CB0635
Case C-635/22, Assofrutti Rom: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 25 October 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Timişoara — Romania) — SC Assofrutti Rom SRL v Agenţia pentru Finanţarea Investiţiilor Rurale, Centrul Regional pentru Finanţarea Investiţiilor Rurale 5 Vest Timişoara (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Common Agricultural Policy — Financial support for investments in tree plantations — Requirement to set out the legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings — Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court — Lack of sufficient information — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case C-635/22, Assofrutti Rom: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 25 October 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Timişoara — Romania) — SC Assofrutti Rom SRL v Agenţia pentru Finanţarea Investiţiilor Rurale, Centrul Regional pentru Finanţarea Investiţiilor Rurale 5 Vest Timişoara (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Common Agricultural Policy — Financial support for investments in tree plantations — Requirement to set out the legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings — Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court — Lack of sufficient information — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case C-635/22, Assofrutti Rom: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 25 October 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Timişoara — Romania) — SC Assofrutti Rom SRL v Agenţia pentru Finanţarea Investiţiilor Rurale, Centrul Regional pentru Finanţarea Investiţiilor Rurale 5 Vest Timişoara (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Common Agricultural Policy — Financial support for investments in tree plantations — Requirement to set out the legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings — Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court — Lack of sufficient information — Manifest inadmissibility)
OJ C, C/2024/528, 8.1.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/528/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
Official Journal |
EN Series C |
|
C/2024/528 |
8.1.2024 |
Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 25 October 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Timişoara — Romania) — SC Assofrutti Rom SRL v Agenţia pentru Finanţarea Investiţiilor Rurale, Centrul Regional pentru Finanţarea Investiţiilor Rurale 5 Vest Timişoara
(Case C-635/22, (1) Assofrutti Rom)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Common Agricultural Policy - Financial support for investments in tree plantations - Requirement to set out the legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings - Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court - Lack of sufficient information - Manifest inadmissibility)
(C/2024/528)
Language of the case: Romanian
Referring court
Curtea de Apel Timişoara
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: SC Assofrutti Rom SRL
Respondents: Agenţia pentru Finanţarea Investiţiilor Rurale, Centrul Regional pentru Finanţarea Investiţiilor Rurale 5 Vest Timişoara
Operative part of the order
The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Curtea de Apel Timişoara (Court of Appeal, Timișoara, Romania), by decision of 30 June 2022, is manifestly inadmissible.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/528/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)