This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62003TJ0010
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 18 February 2004. # Jean-Pierre Koubi v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). # Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark CONFORFLEX - Earlier national word and figurative marks FLEX - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94. # Case T-10/03.
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 18 February 2004.
Jean-Pierre Koubi v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark CONFORFLEX - Earlier national word and figurative marks FLEX - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94.
Case T-10/03.
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 18 February 2004.
Jean-Pierre Koubi v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark CONFORFLEX - Earlier national word and figurative marks FLEX - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94.
Case T-10/03.
European Court Reports 2004 II-00719
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2004:46
«(Community trade mark – Application for Community word mark CONFORFLEX – Earlier national word and figurative marks FLEX – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)»
|
||||
(Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b))
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Fourth Chamber)
18 February 2004 (1)
((Community trade mark – Application for Community work mark CONFORFLEX – Earlier national word and figurative marks FLEX – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94))
In Case T-10/03, Jean-Pierre Koubi, residing in Marseilles (France), represented by K. Manhaeve, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg,applicant,
v
Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), represented by S. Laitinen and S. Pétrequin, acting as Agents,defendant,
the other party to the proceedings beingFabricas Lucia Antonio Betere, SA (Flabesa), established in Madrid (Spain), represented by I. Valdelomar, lawyer, ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 16 October 2002 (Case R 542/2001-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Mr Koubi and Fabricas Lucia Antonio Betere, SA (Flabesa),THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (Fourth Chamber),
having regard to the written procedure and further to the hearing on 20 November 2003,
gives the following
On those grounds,
THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Fourth Chamber),
hereby:
Legal |
Tiili |
Vilaras |
H. Jung |
H. Legal |
Registrar |
President |