Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62008CB0210

Case C-210/08 P: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 January 2009 — Sebirán S.L. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), El Coto de Rioja S.A. (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 8(1)(b) — Likelihood of confusion — Figurative mark Coto D’Arcis — Opposition by the proprietor of word marks COTO DE IMAZ and EL COTO — Partial refusal to register)

OJ C 113, 16.5.2009, p. 18–18 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

16.5.2009   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/18


Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 January 2009 — Sebirán S.L. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), El Coto de Rioja S.A.

(Case C-210/08 P) (1)

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 8(1)(b) - Likelihood of confusion - Figurative mark Coto D’Arcis - Opposition by the proprietor of word marks COTO DE IMAZ and EL COTO - Partial refusal to register)

2009/C 113/35

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Appellant: Sebirán S.L. (represented by: J.A. Calderón Chavero, abogado)

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Laporta Insa, Agent), El Coto de Rioja S.A. (represented by: J. Grimau Muñoz and J. Villamor Muguerza, abogados)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 12 March 2008 in Case T-332/04 Sebirán v OHIM and El Coto de Rioja in which the Court dismissed the application of Sebirán S.L. for annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 15 June 2004 (Case R 550/2003-2)

Operative part of the order

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

2.

Sebirán S.L. is ordered to pay the costs.


(1)  OJ C 183, 19.7.2008.


Top