This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 02015R1222-20210315
Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1222 of 24 July 2015 establishing a guideline on capacity allocation and congestion management (Text with EEA relevance)Text with EEA relevance
Consolidated text: Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1222 of 24 July 2015 establishing a guideline on capacity allocation and congestion management (Text with EEA relevance)Text with EEA relevance
Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1222 of 24 July 2015 establishing a guideline on capacity allocation and congestion management (Text with EEA relevance)Text with EEA relevance
02015R1222 — EN — 15.03.2021 — 001.001
This text is meant purely as a documentation tool and has no legal effect. The Union's institutions do not assume any liability for its contents. The authentic versions of the relevant acts, including their preambles, are those published in the Official Journal of the European Union and available in EUR-Lex. Those official texts are directly accessible through the links embedded in this document
COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) 2015/1222 of 24 July 2015 establishing a guideline on capacity allocation and congestion management (OJ L 197 25.7.2015, p. 24) |
Amended by:
|
|
Official Journal |
||
No |
page |
date |
||
COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2021/280 of 22 February 2021 |
L 62 |
24 |
23.2.2021 |
COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) 2015/1222
of 24 July 2015
establishing a guideline on capacity allocation and congestion management
(Text with EEA relevance)
TITLE I
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Article 1
Subject matter and scope
Article 2
Definitions
For the purposes of this Regulation, the definitions in Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 714/2009, Article 2 of Commission Regulation (EU) No 543/2013 ( 1 ) and Article 2 of Directive 2009/72/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council ( 2 ) shall apply.
In addition, the following definitions shall apply:
‘individual grid model’ means a data set describing power system characteristics (generation, load and grid topology) and related rules to change these characteristics during capacity calculation, prepared by the responsible TSOs, to be merged with other individual grid model components in order to create the common grid model;
‘common grid model’ means a Union-wide data set agreed between various TSOs describing the main characteristic of the power system (generation, loads and grid topology) and rules for changing these characteristics during the capacity calculation process;
‘capacity calculation region’ means the geographic area in which coordinated capacity calculation is applied;
‘scenario’ means the forecasted status of the power system for a given time-frame;
‘net position’ means the netted sum of electricity exports and imports for each market time unit for a bidding zone;
‘allocation constraints’ means the constraints to be respected during capacity allocation to maintain the transmission system within operational security limits and have not been translated into cross-zonal capacity or that are needed to increase the efficiency of capacity allocation;
‘operational security limits’ means the acceptable operating boundaries for secure grid operation such as thermal limits, voltage limits, short-circuit current limits, frequency and dynamic stability limits;
‘coordinated net transmission capacity approach’ means the capacity calculation method based on the principle of assessing and defining ex ante a maximum energy exchange between adjacent bidding zones;
‘flow-based approach’ means a capacity calculation method in which energy exchanges between bidding zones are limited by power transfer distribution factors and available margins on critical network elements;
‘contingency’ means the identified and possible or already occurred fault of an element, including not only the transmission system elements, but also significant grid users and distribution network elements if relevant for the transmission system operational security;
‘coordinated capacity calculator’ means the entity or entities with the task of calculating transmission capacity, at regional level or above;
‘generation shift key’ means a method of translating a net position change of a given bidding zone into estimated specific injection increases or decreases in the common grid model;
‘remedial action’ means any measure applied by a TSO or several TSOs, manually or automatically, in order to maintain operational security;
‘reliability margin’ means the reduction of cross-zonal capacity to cover the uncertainties within capacity calculation;
‘market time’ means central European summer time or central European time, whichever is in effect;
‘congestion income’ means the revenues received as a result of capacity allocation;
‘market congestion’ means a situation in which the economic surplus for single day-ahead or intraday coupling has been limited by cross-zonal capacity or allocation constraints;
‘physical congestion’ means any network situation where forecasted or realised power flows violate the thermal limits of the elements of the grid and voltage stability or the angle stability limits of the power system;
‘structural congestion’ means congestion in the transmission system that can be unambiguously defined, is predictable, is geographically stable over time and is frequently reoccurring under normal power system conditions;
‘matching’ means the trading mode through which sell orders are assigned to appropriate buy orders to ensure the maximisation of economic surplus for single day-ahead or intraday coupling;
‘order’ means an intention to purchase or sell energy or capacity expressed by a market participant subject to specified execution conditions;
‘matched orders’ means all buy and sell orders matched by the price coupling algorithm or the continuous trade matching algorithm;
‘nominated electricity market operator (NEMO)’ means an entity designated by the competent authority to perform tasks related to single day-ahead or single intraday coupling;
‘shared order book’ means a module in the continuous intraday coupling system collecting all matchable orders from the NEMOs participating in single intraday coupling and performing continuous matching of those orders;
‘trade’ means one or more matched orders;
‘single day-ahead coupling’ means the auctioning process where collected orders are matched and cross-zonal capacity is allocated simultaneously for different bidding zones in the day-ahead market;
‘single intraday coupling’ means the continuous process where collected orders are matched and cross-zonal capacity is allocated simultaneously for different bidding zones in the intraday market;
‘price coupling algorithm’ means the algorithm used in single day-ahead coupling for simultaneously matching orders and allocating cross-zonal capacities;
‘continuous trading matching algorithm’ means the algorithm used in single intraday coupling for matching orders and allocating cross-zonal capacities continuously;
‘market coupling operator (MCO) function’ means the task of matching orders from the day-ahead and intraday markets for different bidding zones and simultaneously allocating cross-zonal capacities;
‘clearing price’ means the price determined by matching the highest accepted selling order and the lowest accepted buying order in the electricity market;
‘scheduled exchange’ means an electricity transfer scheduled between geographic areas, for each market time unit and for a given direction;
‘scheduled exchange calculator’ means the entity or entities with the task of calculating scheduled exchanges;
‘day-ahead market time-frame’ means the time-frame of the electricity market until the day-ahead market gate closure time, where, for each market time unit, products are traded the day prior to delivery;
‘day-ahead firmness deadline’ means the point in time after which cross-zonal capacity becomes firm;
‘day-ahead market gate closure time’ means the point in time until which orders are accepted in the day-ahead market;
‘intraday market time-frame’ means the time-frame of the electricity market after intraday cross-zonal gate opening time and before intraday cross-zonal gate closure time, where for each market time unit, products are traded prior to the delivery of the traded products;
‘intraday cross-zonal gate opening time’ means the point in time when cross-zonal capacity between bidding zones is released for a given market time unit and a given bidding zone border;
‘intraday cross-zonal gate closure time’ means the point in time where cross-zonal capacity allocation is no longer permitted for a given market time unit;
‘capacity management module’ means a system containing up-to-date information on available cross-zonal capacity for the purpose of allocating intra-day cross-zonal capacity;
‘non-standard intraday product’ means a product for continuous intraday coupling not for constant energy delivery or for a period exceeding one market time unit with specific characteristics designed to reflect system operation practices or market needs, for example orders covering multiple market time units or products reflecting production unit start-up costs;
‘central counter party’ means the entity or entities with the task of entering into contracts with market participants, by novation of the contracts resulting from the matching process, and of organising the transfer of net positions resulting from capacity allocation with other central counter parties or shipping agents;
‘shipping agent’ means the entity or entities with the task of transferring net positions between different central counter parties;
‘firmness’ means a guarantee that cross-zonal capacity rights will remain unchanged and that a compensation is paid if they are nevertheless changed;
‘force majeure’ means any unforeseeable or unusual event or situation beyond the reasonable control of a TSO, and not due to a fault of the TSO, which cannot be avoided or overcome with reasonable foresight and diligence, which cannot be solved by measures which are from a technical, financial or economic point of view reasonably possible for the TSO, which has actually happened and is objectively verifiable, and which makes it impossible for the TSO to fulfil, temporarily or permanently, its obligations in accordance with this Regulation;
‘economic surplus for the single day-ahead or intraday coupling’ means the sum of (i) the supplier surplus for the single day-ahead or intraday coupling for the relevant time period, (ii) the consumer surplus for the single day-ahead or intraday coupling, (iii) the congestion income and (iv) other related costs and benefits where these increase economic efficiency for the relevant time period, supplier and consumer surplus being the difference between the accepted orders and the clearing price per energy unit multiplied by the volume of energy of the orders.
Article 3
Objectives of capacity allocation and congestion management cooperation
This Regulation aims at:
promoting effective competition in the generation, trading and supply of electricity;
ensuring optimal use of the transmission infrastructure;
ensuring operational security;
optimising the calculation and allocation of cross-zonal capacity;
ensuring fair and non-discriminatory treatment of TSOs, NEMOs, the Agency, regulatory authorities and market participants;
ensuring and enhancing the transparency and reliability of information;
contributing to the efficient long-term operation and development of the electricity transmission system and electricity sector in the Union;
respecting the need for a fair and orderly market and fair and orderly price formation;
creating a level playing field for NEMOs;
providing non-discriminatory access to cross-zonal capacity.
Article 4
NEMOs designation and revocation of the designation
A designated NEMO must notify the designating authority of another Member State if it proposes to perform single day-ahead or intraday coupling in that Member State two months before commencing operation.
By way of exception to paragraph 5 of this Article, a Member State may refuse the trading services by a NEMO designated in another Member State if:
a national legal monopoly for day-ahead and intraday trading services exists in the Member State or bidding zone of the Member State where delivery takes place in accordance with Article 5(1); or
the Member State where delivery takes place can establish that there are technical obstacles to delivery into that Member State of electricity purchased on day-ahead and intraday markets using NEMOs designated in another Member State linked to the need to ensure the objectives of this Regulation are met while maintaining operational security; or
the trading rules in the Member State of delivery are not compatible with the delivery into that Member State of electricity purchased on the basis of day-ahead and intraday trading services provided by a NEMO designated in another Member State; or
the NEMO is a national legal monopoly in accordance with Article 5 in the Member State where it is designated.
Article 5
NEMOs designation in case of a national legal monopoly for trading services
If there are several applicants to be designated as the only NEMO, the Member State concerned shall designate the applicant which best meets the criteria listed in Article 6. If a Member State refuses the designation of more than one NEMO per bidding zone, the competent national authority shall fix or approve the NEMO fees for trading in the day-ahead and intraday markets, sufficiently in advance of their entry into force, or specify the methodologies used to calculate them.
In accordance with Article 4(6), the Member State concerned may also refuse cross-border trading services offered by a NEMO designated in another Member State; however, the protection of existing power exchanges in that Member State from economic disadvantages through competition is not a valid reason for refusal.
Article 6
NEMO designation criteria
An applicant shall only be designated as a NEMO if it complies with all of the following requirements:
it has contracted or contracts adequate resources for common, coordinated and compliant operation of single day-ahead and/or intraday coupling, including the resources necessary to fulfil the NEMO functions, financial resources, the necessary information technology, technical infrastructure and operational procedures or it shall provide proof that it is able to make these resources available within a reasonable preparatory period before taking up its tasks in accordance with Article 7;
it shall be able to ensure that market participants have open access to information regarding the NEMO tasks in accordance with Article 7;
it shall be cost-efficient with respect to single day-ahead and intraday coupling and shall in its internal accounting keep separate accounts for MCO functions and other activities in order to prevent cross-subsidisation;
it shall have an adequate level of business separation from other market participants;
if designated as a national legal monopoly for day-ahead and intraday trading services in a Member State, it shall not use the fees in Article 5(1) to finance its day-ahead or intraday activities in a Member State other than the one where these fees are collected;
it shall be able to treat all market participants in a non-discriminatory way;
it shall have appropriate market surveillance arrangements in place;
it shall have in place appropriate transparency and confidentiality agreements with market participants and the TSOs;
it shall be able to provide the necessary clearing and settlement services;
it shall be able to put in place the necessary communication systems and routines for coordinating with the TSOs of the Member State.
Article 7
NEMO tasks
With regard to single day-ahead and intraday coupling, NEMOs shall in particular be responsible for the following tasks:
implementing the MCO functions set out in paragraph 2 in coordination with other NEMOs;
establishing collectively the requirements for the single day-ahead and intraday coupling, requirements for MCO functions and the price coupling algorithm with respect to all matters related to electricity market functioning in accordance with paragraph 2 of this Article, and Articles 36 and 37;
determining maximum and minimum prices in accordance with Articles 41 and 54;
making anonymous and sharing the received order information necessary to perform the MCO functions provided for in paragraph 2 of this Article and Articles 40 and 53;
assessing the results calculated by the MCO functions set out in paragraph 2 of this Article allocating the orders based on these results, validating the results as final if they are considered correct and taking responsibility for them in accordance with Articles 48 and 60;
informing the market participants on the results of their orders in accordance with Articles 48 and 60;
acting as central counter parties for clearing and settlement of the exchange of energy resulting from single day-ahead and intraday coupling in accordance with Article 68(3);
establishing jointly with relevant NEMOs and TSOs back-up procedures for national or regional market operation in accordance with Article 36(3) if no results are available from the MCO functions in accordance with Article 39(2), taking account of fallback procedures provided for in Article 44;
jointly providing single day-ahead and intraday coupling cost forecasts and cost information to competent regulatory authorities and TSOs where NEMO costs for establishing, amending and operating single day-ahead and intraday coupling are to be covered by the concerned TSOs' contribution in accordance with Articles 75 to 77 and Article 80;
Where applicable, in accordance with Article 45 and 57, coordinate with TSOs to establish arrangements concerning more than one NEMO within a bidding zone and perform single day-ahead and/or intraday coupling in line with the approved arrangements.
NEMOs shall carry out MCO functions jointly with other NEMOs. Those functions shall include the following:
developing and maintaining the algorithms, systems and procedures for single day-ahead and intraday coupling in accordance with Articles 36 and 51;
processing input data on cross-zonal capacity and allocation constraints provided by coordinated capacity calculators in accordance with Articles 46 and 58;
operating the price coupling and continuous trading matching algorithms in accordance with Articles 48 and 60;
validating and sending single day-ahead and intraday coupling results to the NEMOs in accordance with Articles 48 and 60.
The Agency may assess the effectiveness and efficiency of establishment and performance of the MCO function at any time. If that assessment demonstrates that the requirements are not fulfilled, the Agency may recommend to the Commission any further measures needed for timely effective and efficient delivery of single day-ahead and intraday coupling.
Article 8
TSOs' tasks related to single day-ahead and intraday coupling
TSOs shall:
jointly establish TSO requirements for the price coupling and continuous trading matching algorithms for all aspects related to capacity allocation in accordance with Article 37(1)(a);
jointly validate the matching algorithms against the requirements referred to in point (a) of this paragraph in accordance with Article 37(4);
establish and perform capacity calculation in accordance with Articles 14 to 30;
where necessary, establish cross zonal capacity allocation and other arrangements in accordance with Articles 45 and 57;
calculate and send cross zonal capacities and allocation constraints in accordance with Articles 46 and 58;
verify single day-ahead coupling results in terms of validated cross-zonal capacities and allocation constraints in accordance with Articles 48(2) and 52;
where required, establish scheduled exchange calculators for calculating and publishing scheduled exchanges on borders between bidding zones in accordance with Articles 49 and 56;
respect the results from single day-ahead and intraday coupling calculated in accordance with Article 39 and Article 52;
establish and operate fallback procedures as appropriate for capacity allocation in accordance with Article 44;
propose the intraday cross-zonal gate opening and intraday cross-zonal gate closure times in accordance with Article 59;
share congestion income in accordance with the methodology jointly developed in accordance with Article 73;
where so agreed, act as shipping agents transferring net positions in accordance with Article 68(6).
Article 9
Adoption of terms and conditions or methodologies
Where a proposal for terms and conditions or methodologies pursuant to this Regulation needs to be developed and agreed by more than one TSO or NEMO, the participating TSOs and NEMOs shall closely cooperate. TSOs, with the assistance of the ENTSO for Electricity, and all NEMOs shall regularly inform the competent regulatory authorities and the Agency about the progress of developing those terms and conditions or methodologies.
Where TSOs or NEMOs deciding on proposals for terms and conditions or methodologies listed in paragraph 6 are not able to reach an agreement, they shall decide by qualified majority voting. The qualified majority shall be reached within each of the respective voting classes of TSOs and NEMOs. A qualified majority for proposals listed in paragraph 6 shall require the following majority:
TSOs or NEMOs representing at least 55 % of the Member States; and
TSOs or NEMOs representing Member States comprising at least 65 % of the population of the Union.
A blocking minority for decisions on proposals for terms and conditions or methodologies listed in paragraph 6 shall include TSOs or NEMOs representing at least four Member States, failing of which the qualified majority shall be deemed attained.
For TSO decisions on proposals for terms and conditions or methodologies listed in paragraph 6, one vote shall be attributed per Member State. If there is more than one TSO in the territory of a Member State, the Member State shall allocate the voting powers among the TSOs.
For NEMOs deciding on proposals for terms and conditions or methodologies listed in paragraph 6, one vote shall be attributed per Member State. Each NEMO shall have a number of votes equal to the number of Member States where it is designated. If more than one NEMO is designated in the territory of a Member State, the Member State shall allocate the voting powers among the NEMOs, taking into account their respective volume of transacted electricity in that particular Member State in the preceding financial year.
Except for Article 43(1), Article 44, Article 56(1), Article 63 and Article 74(1), where TSOs deciding on proposals for terms and conditions or methodologies listed in paragraph (7) are not able to reach an agreement and where the regions concerned are composed of more than five Member States, they shall decide by qualified majority voting. The qualified majority shall be reached within each of the respective voting classes of TSOs and NEMOs. A qualified majority for proposals for terms and conditions or methodologies listed in paragraph 7 shall require the following majority:
TSOs representing at least 72 % of the Member States concerned; and
TSOs representing Member States comprising at least 65 % of the population of the concerned region.
A blocking minority for decisions on proposals for terms and conditions or methodologies listed in paragraph 7 shall include at least the minimum number of TSOs representing more than 35 % of the population of the participating Member States, plus TSOs representing at least one additional Member State concerned, failing of which the qualified majority shall be deemed attained.
TSOs deciding on proposals for terms and conditions or methodologies listed in paragraph 7 in relation to regions composed of five Member States or less shall decide by consensus.
For TSO decisions on proposals for terms and conditions or methodologies listed in paragraph 7, one vote shall be attributed per Member State. If there is more than one TSO in the territory of a Member State, the Member State shall allocate the voting powers among the TSOs.
NEMOs deciding on proposals for terms and conditions or methodologies listed in paragraph 7 shall decide by consensus.
The proposals for the following terms and conditions or methodologies and any amendments thereof shall be subject to approval by the Agency:
the plan on joint performance of MCO functions in accordance with Article 7(3);
the capacity calculation regions in accordance with Article 15(1);
the generation and load data provision methodology in accordance with Article 16(1);
the common grid model methodology in accordance with Article 17(1);
the proposal for a harmonised capacity calculation methodology in accordance with Article 21(4);
back-up methodology in accordance with Article 36(3);
the algorithm submitted by NEMOs in accordance with Article 37(5), including the TSOs’ and NEMOs’ sets of requirements for algorithm development in accordance with Article 37(1);
products that can be taken into account by NEMOs in the single day-ahead and intraday coupling process in accordance with Articles 40 and 53;
the maximum and minimum prices in accordance with Articles 41(1) and 54(2);
the intraday capacity pricing methodology to be developed in accordance with Article 55(1);
the intraday cross–zonal gate opening and intraday cross-zonal gate closure times in accordance with Article 59(1);
the day-ahead firmness deadline in accordance with Article 69;
the congestion income distribution methodology in accordance with Article 73(1).
The proposals for the following terms and conditions or methodologies and any amendments thereof shall be subject to approval by all regulatory authorities of the concerned region:
the common capacity calculation methodology in accordance with Article 20(2);
decisions on the introduction and postponement of flow-based calculation in accordance with Article 20(2) to (6) and on exemptions in accordance with Article 20(7);
the methodology for coordinated redispatching and countertrading in accordance with Article 35(1);
the common methodologies for the calculation of scheduled exchanges in accordance with Articles 43(1) and 56(1);
the fallback procedures in accordance with Article 44;
complementary regional auctions in accordance with Article 63(1);
the conditions for the provision of explicit allocation in accordance with Article 64(2);
the redispatching or countertrading cost sharing methodology in accordance with Article 74(1).
The following terms and conditions or methodologies and any amendments thereof shall be subject to individual approval by each regulatory authority or other competent authority of the Member States concerned:
where applicable, NEMO designation and revocation or suspension of designation in accordance with Article 4(2), (8) and (9);
if applicable, the fees or the methodologies used to calculate the fees of NEMOs relating to trading in the day-ahead and intraday markets in accordance with Article 5(1);
proposals of individual TSOs for a review of the bidding zone configuration in accordance with Article 32(1)(d);
where applicable, the proposal for cross-zonal capacity allocation and other arrangements in accordance with Articles 45 and 57;
capacity allocation and congestion management costs in accordance with Articles 75 to 79;
if applicable, cost sharing of regional costs of single day-ahead and intraday coupling in accordance with Article 80(4).
The proposals for amendment to the terms and conditions or methodologies shall be submitted to consultation in accordance with the procedure set out in Article 12 and approved in accordance with the procedure set out in this Article.
Article 10
Day-to-day management of the single day-ahead and intraday coupling
TSOs and NEMOs shall jointly organise the day-to-day management of the single day-ahead and intraday coupling. They shall meet regularly to discuss and decide on day-to-day operational issues. TSOs and NEMOs shall invite the Agency and the Commission as observers to these meetings and shall publish summary minutes of the meetings.
Article 11
Stakeholder involvement
The Agency, in close cooperation with ENTSO for Electricity, shall organise stakeholder involvement regarding single day-ahead and intraday coupling and other aspects of the implementation of this Regulation. This shall include regular meetings with stakeholders to identify problems and propose improvements notably related to the single day-ahead and intraday coupling. This shall not replace the stakeholder consultations in accordance with Article 12.
Article 12
Consultation
Article 13
Confidentiality obligations
TITLE II
REQUIREMENTS FOR TERMS, CONDITIONS AND METHODOLOGIES CONCERNING CAPACITY ALLOCATION AND CONGESTION MANAGEMENT
CHAPTER 1
Capacity calculation
Article 14
Capacity calculation time-frames
All TSOs shall calculate cross-zonal capacity for at least the following time-frames:
day-ahead, for the day-ahead market;
intraday, for the intraday market.
Article 15
Capacity calculation regions
The proposal referred to in paragraph 1 shall define the bidding zone borders attributed to TSOs who are members of each capacity calculation region. The following requirements shall be met:
it shall take into consideration the regions specified in point 3(2) of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 714/2009;
each bidding zone border, or two separate bidding zone borders if applicable, through which interconnection between two bidding zones exists, shall be assigned to one capacity calculation region;
at least those TSOs shall be assigned to all capacity calculation regions in which they have bidding zone borders.
Capacity calculation regions applying a flow-based approach shall be merged into one capacity calculation region if the following cumulative conditions are fulfilled:
their transmission systems are directly linked to each other;
they participate in the same single day-ahead or intraday coupling area;
merging them is more efficient than keeping them separate. The competent regulatory authorities may request a joint cost-benefit analysis from the TSOs concerned to assess the efficiency of the merger.
Article 16
Generation and load data provision methodology
The proposal for a generation and load data provision methodology shall specify the information to be provided by generation units and loads to TSOs. The information shall at least include the following:
information related to their technical characteristics;
information related to the availability of generation units and loads;
information related to the schedules of generation units;
relevant available information relating to how generation units will be dispatched.
No later than two months after the approval of the generation and load data provision methodology by all regulatory authorities, ENTSO for Electricity shall publish:
a list of the entities required to provide information to the TSOs;
a list of the information referred to in paragraph 3 to be provided;
deadlines for providing information.
Article 17
Common grid model methodology
The common grid model methodology shall enable a common grid model to be established. It shall contain at least the following items:
a definition of scenarios in accordance with Article 18;
a definition of individual grid models in accordance with Article 19;
a description of the process for merging individual grid models to form the common grid model.
Article 18
Scenarios
Article 19
Individual grid model
For each bidding zone and for each scenario:
all TSOs in the bidding zone shall jointly provide a single individual grid model which complies with Article 18(3); or
each TSO in the bidding zone shall provide an individual grid model for its control area, including interconnections, provided that the sum of net positions in the control areas, including interconnections, covering the bidding zone complies with Article 18(3).
Article 20
Introduction of flow-based capacity calculation methodology
The methodology in the two capacity calculation regions which have initiated developing a common capacity calculation methodology may be implemented first before developing a common capacity calculation methodology with any further capacity calculation region.
Article 21
Capacity calculation methodology
The proposal for a common capacity calculation methodology for a capacity calculation region determined in accordance with Article 20(2) shall include at least the following items for each capacity calculation time-frame:
methodologies for the calculation of the inputs to capacity calculation, which shall include the following parameters:
a methodology for determining the reliability margin in accordance with Article 22;
the methodologies for determining operational security limits, contingencies relevant to capacity calculation and allocation constraints that may be applied in accordance with Article 23;
the methodology for determining the generation shift keys in accordance with Article 24;
the methodology for determining remedial actions to be considered in capacity calculation in accordance with Article 25.
a detailed description of the capacity calculation approach which shall include the following:
a mathematical description of the applied capacity calculation approach with different capacity calculation inputs;
rules for avoiding undue discrimination between internal and cross-zonal exchanges to ensure compliance with point 1.7 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 714/2009;
rules for taking into account, where appropriate, previously allocated cross-zonal capacity;
rules on the adjustment of power flows on critical network elements or of cross-zonal capacity due to remedial actions in accordance with Article 25;
for the flow-based approach, a mathematical description of the calculation of power transfer distribution factors and of the calculation of available margins on critical network elements;
for the coordinated net transmission capacity approach, the rules for calculating cross-zonal capacity, including the rules for efficiently sharing the power flow capabilities of critical network elements among different bidding zone borders;
where the power flows on critical network elements are influenced by cross-zonal power exchanges in different capacity calculation regions, the rules for sharing the power flow capabilities of critical network elements among different capacity calculation regions in order to accommodate these flows.
a methodology for the validation of cross-zonal capacity in accordance with Article 26.
Article 22
Reliability margin methodology
The methodology to determine the reliability margin shall set out the principles for calculating the probability distribution of the deviations between the expected power flows at the time of the capacity calculation and realised power flows in real time, and specify the uncertainties to be taken into account in the calculation. To determine those uncertainties, the methodology shall in particular take into account:
unintended deviations of physical electricity flows within a market time unit caused by the adjustment of electricity flows within and between control areas, to maintain a constant frequency;
uncertainties which could affect capacity calculation and which could occur between the capacity calculation time-frame and real time, for the market time unit being considered.
Article 23
Methodologies for operational security limits, contingencies and allocation constraints
If TSOs apply allocation constraints, they can only be determined using:
constraints that are needed to maintain the transmission system within operational security limits and that cannot be transformed efficiently into maximum flows on critical network elements; or
constraints intended to increase the economic surplus for single day-ahead or intraday coupling.
Article 24
Generation shift keys methodology
Article 25
Methodology for remedial actions in capacity calculation
Article 26
Cross-zonal capacity validation methodology
Article 27
General provisions
Using the latest available information, all TSOs shall regularly and at least once a year review and update:
the operational security limits, contingencies and allocation constraints used for capacity calculation;
the probability distribution of the deviations between expected power flows at the time of capacity calculation and realised power flows in real time used for calculation of reliability margins;
the remedial actions taken into account in capacity calculation;
the application of the methodologies for determining generation shift keys, critical network elements and contingencies referred to in Articles 22 to 24.
Article 28
Creation of a common grid model
Article 29
Regional calculation of cross-zonal capacity
When calculating cross-zonal capacity, each coordinated capacity calculator shall:
use generation shift keys to calculate the impact of changes in bidding zone net positions and of flows on direct current lines;
ignore those critical network elements that are not significantly influenced by the changes in bidding zone net positions according to the methodology set out in Article 21; and,
ensure that all sets of bidding zone net positions and flows on direct current lines not exceeding cross-zonal capacity comply with reliability margins and operational security limits in accordance with Article 21(1)(a)(i) and (ii), and take into account previously allocated cross-zonal capacity in accordance with Article 21(1)(b)(iii).
Each coordinated capacity calculator applying the flow-based approach shall:
use data on operational security limits to calculate the maximum flows on critical network elements;
use the common grid model, generation shift keys and contingencies to calculate the power transfer distribution factors;
use power transfer distribution factors to calculate the flows resulting from previously allocated cross-zonal capacity in the capacity calculation region;
calculate flows on critical network elements for each scenario (taking into account contingencies), and adjust them by assuming no cross-zonal power exchanges within the capacity calculation region, applying the rules for avoiding undue discrimination between internal and cross-zonal power exchanges established in accordance with Article 21(1)(b)(ii);
calculate the available margins on critical network elements, taking into account contingencies, which shall equal the maximum flows reduced by adjusted flows referred to in point (d), reliability margins, and flows resulting from previously allocated cross-zonal capacity;
adjust the available margins on critical network elements or power transfer distribution factors using available remedial actions to be considered in capacity calculation in accordance with Article 25.
Each coordinated capacity calculator applying the coordinated net transmission capacity approach shall:
use the common grid model, generation shift keys and contingencies to calculate maximum power exchange on bidding zone borders, which shall equal the maximum calculated exchange between two bidding zones on either side of the bidding zone border respecting operational security limits;
adjust maximum power exchange using remedial actions taken into account in capacity calculation in accordance with Article 25;
adjust maximum power exchange, applying rules for avoiding undue discrimination between internal and cross-zonal exchanges in accordance with Article 21(1)(b)(ii);
apply the rules set out in accordance with Article 21(1)(b)(vi) for efficiently sharing the power flow capabilities of critical network elements among different bidding zone borders;
calculate cross-zonal capacity, which shall be equal to maximum power exchange adjusted for the reliability margin and previously allocated cross-zonal capacity.
Each coordinated capacity calculator shall set:
flow-based parameters for each bidding zone within the capacity calculation region, if applying the flow-based approach; or
cross-zonal capacity values for each bidding zone border within the capacity calculation region, if applying the coordinated net transmission capacity approach.
Article 30
Validation and delivery of cross-zonal capacity
Article 31
Biennial report on capacity calculation and allocation
For each bidding zone, bidding zone border and capacity calculation region, the report on capacity calculation and allocation shall contain at least:
the capacity calculation approach used;
statistical indicators on reliability margins;
statistical indicators of cross-zonal capacity, including allocation constraints where appropriate for each capacity calculation time-frame;
quality indicators for the information used for the capacity calculation;
where appropriate, proposed measures to improve capacity calculation;
for regions where the coordinated net transmission capacity approach is applied, an analysis of whether the conditions specified in Article 20(7) are still fulfilled;
indicators for assessing and following in the longer term the efficiency of single day-ahead and intraday coupling, including the merging of capacity calculation regions in accordance with Article 15(3) where relevant;
recommendations for further development of single day-ahead and intraday coupling, including further harmonisation of methodologies, processes and governance arrangements.
CHAPTER 2
Bidding zone configuration
Article 32
Reviewing existing bidding zone configurations
A review of an existing bidding zone configuration may be launched by:
the Agency, in accordance with Article 34(7);
several regulatory authorities, pursuant to a recommendation from the Agency in accordance with Article 34;
TSOs of a capacity calculation region, together with all concerned TSOs whose control areas, including interconnectors, are within the geographic area in which the bidding zone configuration shall be assessed in accordance with paragraph 2(a);
one single regulatory authority or TSO with the approval of its competent regulatory authority, for the bidding zones inside the TSO's control area, if the bidding zone configuration has negligible impact on neighbouring TSOs' control areas, including interconnectors, and the review of bidding zone configuration is necessary to improve efficiency, or to maintain operational security;
Member States in a capacity calculation region.
If a review is launched in accordance with paragraph 1(a),(b), (c) or (e), the entity launching the review shall specify:
the geographic area in which bidding zone configuration shall be assessed and the neighbouring geographic areas for which impacts shall be taken into account;
the participating TSOs;
the participating regulatory authorities.
If a review is launched in accordance with paragraph 1(d), the following conditions shall apply:
the geographic area in which bidding zone configuration is assessed shall be limited to the control area of the relevant TSO, including interconnectors;
the TSO of the relevant control area shall be the only TSO participating in the review;
the competent regulatory authority shall be the only regulatory authority participating in the review;
the relevant TSO and regulatory authority, respectively, shall give the neighbouring TSOs and regulatory authorities mutually agreed prior notice of the launch of the review, giving reasons; and
the conditions for the review shall be specified, and the results of the review and proposal for the relevant regulatory authorities shall be published.
The review process shall consist of two steps.
In the first step, the TSOs participating in a review of bidding zone configuration shall develop the methodology and assumptions that will be used in the review process and propose alternative bidding zone configurations for the assessment.
The proposal on methodology and assumptions and alternative bidding zone configuration shall be submitted to the participating regulatory authorities, which shall be able to require coordinated amendments within three months.
In the second step, the TSOs participating in a review of bidding zone configuration shall:
assess and compare the current bidding zone configuration and each alternative bidding zone configuration using the criteria specified in Article 33;
hold a consultation in accordance with Article 12 and a workshop regarding the alternative bidding zone configuration proposals compared to the existing bidding zone configuration, including timescales for implementation, unless the bidding zone configuration has negligible impact on neighbouring TSOs' control areas;
submit a joint proposal to maintain or amend the bidding zone configuration to the participating Member States and the participating regulatory authorities within 15 months of the decision to launch a review.
On receiving the joint proposal to maintain or to amend the bidding zone configuration in accordance with point (iii) above, the participating Member States or, where provided by Member States, the regulatory authorities shall within six months reach an agreement on the proposal to maintain or amend the bidding zone configuration.
Article 33
Criteria for reviewing bidding zone configurations
If a review of bidding zone configuration is carried out in accordance with Article 32, at least the following criteria shall be considered:
in respect of network security:
the ability of bidding zone configurations to ensure operational security and security of supply;
the degree of uncertainty in cross–zonal capacity calculation.
in respect of overall market efficiency:
any increase or decrease in economic efficiency arising from the change;
market efficiency, including, at least the cost of guaranteeing firmness of capacity, market liquidity, market concentration and market power, the facilitation of effective competition, price signals for building infrastructure, the accuracy and robustness of price signals;
transaction and transition costs, including the cost of amending existing contractual obligations incurred by market participants, NEMOs and TSOs;
the cost of building new infrastructure which may relieve existing congestion;
the need to ensure that the market outcome is feasible without the need for extensive application of economically inefficient remedial actions;
any adverse effects of internal transactions on other bidding zones to ensure compliance with point 1.7 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 714/2009;
the impact on the operation and efficiency of the balancing mechanisms and imbalance settlement processes.
in respect of the stability and robustness of bidding zones:
the need for bidding zones to be sufficiently stable and robust over time;
the need for bidding zones to be consistent for all capacity calculation time-frames;
the need for each generation and load unit to belong to only one bidding zone for each market time unit;
the location and frequency of congestion, if structural congestion influences the delimitation of bidding zones, taking into account any future investment which may relieve existing congestion.
Article 34
Regular reporting on current bidding zone configuration by ENTSO for Electricity and the Agency
It shall:
request ENTSO for Electricity to draft a technical report on current bidding zone configuration; and
draft a market report evaluating the impact of current bidding zone configuration on market efficiency.
The technical report referred to in paragraph 1 second subparagraph point (a) shall include at least:
a list of structural congestion and other major physical congestion, including locations and frequency;
an analysis of the expected evolution or removal of physical congestion resulting from investment in networks or from significant changes in generation or in consumption patterns;
an analysis of the share of power flows that do not result from the capacity allocation mechanism, for each capacity calculation region, where appropriate;
congestion incomes and firmness costs;
a scenario encompassing a ten year time-frame.
CHAPTER 3
Redispatching and countertrading
Article 35
Coordinated redispatching and countertrading
By 26 months after the regulatory approval of capacity calculation regions, all TSOs in each capacity calculation region shall develop a report, subject to consultation in accordance with Article 12, assessing the progressive coordination and harmonisation of those mechanisms and agreements and including proposals. The report shall be submitted to their respective regulatory authorities for their assessment. The proposals in the report shall prevent these mechanisms and agreements from distorting the market.
Pricing of redispatching and countertrading shall be based on:
prices in the relevant electricity markets for the relevant time-frame; or
the cost of redispatching and countertrading resources calculated transparently on the basis of incurred costs.
CHAPTER 4
Algorithm development
Article 36
General provisions
All NEMOs shall develop, maintain and operate the following algorithms:
a price coupling algorithm;
a continuous trading matching algorithm.
Article 37
Algorithm development
By eight months after the entry into force of this Regulation:
all TSOs shall jointly provide all NEMOs with a proposal for a common set of requirements for efficient capacity allocation to enable the development of the price coupling algorithm and of the continuous trading matching algorithm. These requirements shall specify functionalities and performance, including deadlines for the delivery of single day-ahead and intraday coupling results and details of the cross-zonal capacity and allocation constraints to be respected;
all NEMOs shall jointly propose a common set of requirements for efficient matching to enable the development of the price coupling algorithm and of the continuous trading matching algorithm.
CHAPTER 5
Single day-ahead coupling
Article 38
Objectives of the price coupling algorithm
The price coupling algorithm shall produce the results set out in Article 39(2), in a manner which:
aims at maximising economic surplus for single day-ahead coupling for the price-coupled region for the next trading day;
uses the marginal pricing principle according to which all accepted bids will have the same price per bidding zone per market time unit;
facilitates efficient price formation;
respects cross-zonal capacity and allocation constraints;
is repeatable and scalable.
Article 39
Inputs and results of the price coupling algorithm
In order to produce results, the price coupling algorithm shall use:
allocation constraints established in accordance with Article 23(3);
cross-zonal capacity results validated in accordance with Article 30;
orders submitted in accordance with Article 40.
The price coupling algorithm shall produce at least the following results simultaneously for each market time unit:
a single clearing price for each bidding zone and market time unit in EUR/MWh;
a single net position for each bidding zone and each market time unit;
the information which enables the execution status of orders to be determined.
Article 40
Products accommodated
By two years after the entry into force of this Regulation and in every second subsequent year, all NEMOs shall consult, in accordance with Article 12:
market participants, to ensure that available products reflect their needs;
all TSOs, to ensure products take due account of operational security;
all regulatory authorities, to ensure that the available products comply with the objectives of this Regulation.
Article 41
Maximum and minimum prices
The proposal shall be subject to consultation in accordance with Article 12.
Where a Member State has provided that an authority other than the national regulatory authority has the power to approve maximum and minimum clearing prices at the national level, the regulatory authority shall consult the proposal with the relevant authority as regards its impact on national markets.
After receiving a decision for approval from all regulatory authorities, all NEMOs shall inform the concerned TSOs of that decision without undue delay.
Article 42
Pricing of day-ahead cross-zonal capacity
Article 43
Methodology for calculating scheduled exchanges resulting from single day-ahead coupling
Article 44
Establishment of fallback procedures
By 16 months after the entry into force of this Regulation, each TSO, in coordination with all the other TSOs in the capacity calculation region, shall develop a proposal for robust and timely fallback procedures to ensure efficient, transparent and non-discriminatory capacity allocation in the event that the single day-ahead coupling process is unable to produce results.
The proposal for the establishment of fallback procedures shall be subject to consultation in accordance with Article 12.
Article 45
Arrangements concerning more than one NEMO in one bidding zone and for interconnectors which are not operated by certified TSOs
Article 46
Provision of input data
In such cases, cross-zonal capacity and allocation constraints shall be provided by the coordinated capacity calculator no later than 30 minutes before the day-ahead market gate closure time.
Article 47
Operation of single day-ahead coupling
Article 48
Delivery of results
No later than by the time specified by all TSOs in the requirements set out in Article 37(1)(a), all NEMOs performing MCO functions shall deliver the single day-ahead coupling results:
to all TSOs, all coordinated capacity calculators and all NEMOs, for the results specified in Article 39(2)(a) and (b);
to all NEMOs, for the results specified in Article 39(2)(c).
Article 49
Calculation of scheduled exchanges resulting from single day-ahead coupling
Article 50
Initiation of fallback procedures
CHAPTER 6
Single intraday coupling
Article 51
Objectives of the continuous trading matching algorithm
From the intraday cross-zonal gate opening time until the intraday cross-zonal gate closure time, the continuous trading matching algorithm shall determine which orders to select for matching such that matching:
aims at maximising economic surplus for single intraday coupling per trade for the intraday market time-frame by allocating capacity to orders for which it is feasible to match in accordance with the price and time of submission;
respects the allocation constraints provided in accordance with Article 58(1);
respects the cross-zonal capacity provided in accordance with Article 58(1);
respects the requirements for the delivery of results set out in Article 60;
is repeatable and scalable.
Article 52
Results of the continuous trading matching algorithm
All NEMOs, as part of their MCO function, shall ensure that the continuous trading matching algorithm produces at least the following results:
the execution status of orders and prices per trade;
a single net position for each bidding zone and market time unit within the intraday market.
Article 53
Products accommodated
By two years after the entry into force of this Regulation and in every second subsequent year, all NEMOs shall consult in accordance with Article 12:
market participants, to ensure that available products reflect their needs;
all TSOs, to ensure products take due account of operational security;
all regulatory authorities, to ensure that the available products comply with the objectives of this Regulation.
Article 54
Maximum and minimum prices
The proposal shall be subject to consultation in accordance with Article 12.
Article 55
Pricing of intraday capacity
Article 56
Methodology for calculating scheduled exchanges resulting from single intraday coupling
The proposal shall be subject to consultation in accordance with Article 12.
Article 57
Arrangements concerning more than one NEMO in one bidding zone and for interconnectors which are not operated by certified TSOs
Article 58
Provision of input data
Article 59
Operation of single intraday coupling
The intraday cross-zonal gate closure time shall be set in such a way that it:
maximises market participants' opportunities for adjusting their balances by trading in the intraday market time-frame as close as possible to real time; and
provides TSOs and market participants with sufficient time for their scheduling and balancing processes in relation to network and operational security.
Article 60
Delivery of results
All NEMOs performing MCO functions shall deliver the continuous trading matching algorithm results:
to all other NEMOs, for results on the execution status per trade specified in Article 52(1)(a);
to all TSOs and scheduled exchange calculators, for results single net positions specified in Article 52(1)(b).
Article 61
Calculation of scheduled exchanges resulting from single intraday coupling
Article 62
Publication of market information
Article 63
Complementary regional auctions
The competent regulatory authorities may approve the proposal for complementary regional intraday auctions if the following conditions are met:
regional auctions shall not have an adverse impact on the liquidity of the single intraday coupling;
all cross-zonal capacity shall be allocated through the capacity management module;
the regional auction shall not introduce any undue discrimination between market participants from adjacent regions;
the timetables for regional auctions shall be consistent with single intraday coupling to enable market participants to trade as close as possible to real-time;
regulatory authorities shall have consulted the market participants in the Member States concerned.
Article 64
Provisions relating to explicit allocation
Article 65
Removal of explicit allocation
Article 66
Provisions relating to intraday arrangements
Article 67
Explicit requests for capacity
A request for explicit cross-zonal capacity may be submitted by a market participant only for an interconnection where the explicit allocation is applicable. For each request for explicit capacity the market participant shall submit the volume and the price to the capacity management module. The price and volume of explicit allocated capacity shall be made publicly available by the relevant TSOs.
CHAPTER 7
Clearing and settlement for single day-ahead and intraday coupling
Article 68
Clearing and settlement
Such exchanges shall take into account:
net positions produced in accordance with Articles 39(2)(b) and 52(1)(b);
scheduled exchanges calculated in accordance with Articles 49 and 61.
Each central counter party shall ensure that for each market time unit:
across all bidding zones, taking into account, where appropriate, allocation constraints, there are no deviations between the sum of energy transferred out of all surplus bidding zones and the sum of energy transferred into all deficit bidding zones;
electricity exports and electricity imports between bidding zones equal each other, with any deviations resulting only from considerations of allocation constraints, where appropriate.
CHAPTER 8
Firmness of allocated cross-zonal capacity
Article 69
Proposal for day-ahead firmness deadline
By 16 months after the entry into force of this Regulation, all TSOs shall develop a common proposal for a single day-ahead firmness deadline, which shall not be shorter than half an hour before the day-ahead market gate closure time. The proposal shall be subject to consultation in accordance with Article 12.
Article 70
Firmness of day-ahead capacity and allocation constraints
Article 71
Firmness of intraday capacity
Cross-zonal intraday capacity shall be firm as soon as it is allocated.
Article 72
Firmness in the event of force majeure or emergency situations
If allocated capacity is curtailed because of force majeure or an emergency situation invoked by a TSO, the TSO shall reimburse or provide compensation for the period of force majeure or the emergency situation, in accordance with the following requirements:
if there is implicit allocation, central counter parties or shipping agents shall not be subject to financial damage or financial benefit arising from any imbalance created by such curtailment;
in the event of force majeure, if capacity is allocated via explicit allocation, market participants shall be entitled to reimbursement of the price paid for the capacity during the explicit allocation process;
in an emergency situation, if capacity is allocated via explicit allocation, market participants shall be entitled to compensation equal to the price difference of relevant markets between the bidding zones concerned in the relevant time-frame; or
in an emergency situation, if capacity is allocated via explicit allocation but the bidding zone price is not calculated in at least one of the two relevant bidding zones in the relevant time-frame, market participants shall be entitled to reimbursement of the price paid for capacity during the explicit allocation process.
TITLE III
COSTS
CHAPTER 1
Congestion income distribution methodology for single day-ahead and intraday coupling
Article 73
Congestion income distribution methodology
The methodology developed in accordance with paragraph 1 shall:
facilitate the efficient long-term operation and development of the electricity transmission system and the efficient operation of the electricity market of the Union;
comply with the general principles of congestion management provided for in Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 714/2009;
allow for reasonable financial planning;
be compatible across time-frames;
establish arrangements to share congestion income deriving from transmission assets owned by parties other than TSOs.
CHAPTER 2
Redispatching and countertrading cost sharing methodology for single day-ahead and intraday coupling
Article 74
Redispatching and countertrading cost sharing methodology
The redispatching and countertrading cost sharing methodology shall at least:
determine which costs incurred from using remedial actions, for which costs have been considered in the capacity calculation and where a common framework on the use of such actions has been established, are eligible for sharing between all the TSOs of a capacity calculation region in accordance with the capacity calculation methodology set out in Articles 20 and 21;
define which costs incurred from using redispatching or countertrading to guarantee the firmness of cross-zonal capacity are eligible for sharing between all the TSOs of a capacity calculation region in accordance with the capacity calculation methodology set out in Articles 20 and 21;
set rules for region-wide cost sharing as determined in accordance with points (a) and (b).
The methodology developed in accordance with paragraph 1 shall include:
a mechanism to verify the actual need for redispatching or countertrading between the TSOs involved;
an ex post mechanism to monitor the use of remedial actions with costs;
a mechanism to assess the impact of the remedial actions, based on operational security and economic criteria;
a process allowing improvement of the remedial actions;
a process allowing monitoring of each capacity calculation region by the competent regulatory authorities.
The methodology developed in accordance with paragraph 1 shall also:
provide incentives to manage congestion, including remedial actions and incentives to invest effectively;
be consistent with the responsibilities and liabilities of the TSOs involved;
ensure a fair distribution of costs and benefits between the TSOs involved;
be consistent with other related mechanisms, including at least:
the methodology for sharing congestion income set out in Article 73;
the inter-TSO compensation mechanism, as set out in Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 714/2009 and Commission Regulation (EU) No 838/2010 ( 3 );
facilitate the efficient long-term development and operation of the pan-European interconnected system and the efficient operation of the pan-European electricity market;
facilitate adherence to the general principles of congestion management as set out in Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 714/2009;
allow reasonable financial planning;
be compatible across the day-ahead and intraday market time-frames; and
comply with the principles of transparency and non-discrimination.
CHAPTER 3
Capacity allocation and congestion management cost recovery
Article 75
General provisions on cost recovery
Article 76
Costs of establishing, amending and operating single day-ahead and intraday coupling
All NEMOs shall bear the following costs:
common, regional and national costs of establishing, updating or further developing the price coupling algorithm and single day-ahead coupling;
common, regional and national costs of establishing, updating or further developing the continuous trading matching algorithm and single intraday coupling;
common, regional and national costs of operating single day-ahead and intraday coupling.
Article 77
Clearing and settlement costs
Article 78
Costs of establishing and operating the coordinated capacity calculation process
All TSOs in each capacity calculation region shall bear the costs of establishing and operating the coordinated capacity calculators.
Article 79
Costs of ensuring firmness
The costs of ensuring firmness in accordance with Articles 70(2) and 71 shall be borne by the relevant TSOs, to the extent possible in accordance with Article 16(6)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 714/2009. These costs shall include the costs from compensation mechanisms associated with ensuring the firmness of cross-zonal capacities as well as the costs of redispatching, countertrading and imbalance associated with compensating market participants.
Article 80
Cost sharing between NEMOs and TSOs in different Member States
The costs referred to in paragraph 1 shall be broken down into:
common costs resulting from coordinated activities of all NEMOs or TSOs participating in the single day-ahead and intraday coupling;
regional costs resulting from activities of NEMOs or TSOs cooperating in a certain region;
national costs resulting from activities of the NEMOs or TSOs in that Member State.
TITLE IV
DELEGATION OF TASKS AND MONITORING
Article 81
Delegation of tasks
Article 82
Monitoring of the implementation of single day-ahead and intraday coupling
Monitoring of the implementation of single day-ahead and intraday coupling by ENTSO for Electricity in accordance with Article 8(8) of Regulation (EC) No 714/2009 shall in particular cover the following matters:
progress and potential problems with the implementation of single day-ahead and intraday coupling, including the choice of different available options in each country;
preparing the report on capacity calculation and allocation in accordance with Article 31(1);
the efficiency of current bidding zone configuration in coordination with the Agency in accordance with Article 34;
the effectiveness of the operation of the price coupling algorithm and of the continuous trading matching algorithm in cooperation with NEMOs in accordance with Article 37(6);
the effectiveness of the criterion concerning the estimation of the value of lost load, in accordance with Articles 41(1) and 54(1); and
the review of the methodology for calculating scheduled exchanges resulting from single day-ahead coupling in accordance with Article 43(4).
TITLE V
TRANSITIONAL AND FINAL PROVISIONS
Article 83
Transitional provisions for Ireland and Northern Ireland
From the date of the entry into force of this Regulation until 31 December 2017, Ireland and Northern Ireland shall implement preparatory transitional arrangements. Those transitional arrangements shall:
facilitate the transition to full implementation of and full compliance with this Regulation, and include all necessary preparatory measures for full implementation of and full compliance with this Regulation, by 31 December 2017;
guarantee a reasonable degree of integration with the markets in adjacent jurisdictions;
provide for at least:
allocation of interconnector capacity in an explicit day-ahead auction and in at least two implicit intraday auctions;
joint nomination of interconnection capacity and energy at the day-ahead market time-frame;
application of the ‘Use-It-Or-Lose-It’ or ‘Use-It-Or-Sell-It’ principle, as specified in point 2.5 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 714/2009, to capacity not used at the day-ahead market time-frame.
ensure fair and non-discriminatory pricing of interconnector capacity in the implicit intraday auctions;
put in place fair, transparent and non-discriminatory compensation mechanisms for ensuring firmness;
set out a detailed roadmap, approved by the regulatory authorities for Ireland and Northern Ireland, with milestones for achieving full implementation of and compliance with this Regulation;
be subject to a consultation process, involving all relevant parties and give the utmost consideration to the consultation's outcome;
be justified on the basis of a cost-benefit analysis;
not unduly affect other jurisdictions.
Article 84
Entry into force
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
( 1 ) Commission Regulation (EU) No 543/2013 of 14 June 2013 on submission and publication of data in electricity markets and amending Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 714/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 163, 15.6.2013, p. 1).
( 2 ) Directive 2009/72/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity and repealing Directive 2003/54/EC (OJ L 211, 14.8.2009, p. 55).
( 3 ) Commission Regulation (EU) No 838/2010 of 23 September 2010 on laying down guidelines relating to the inter-transmission system operator compensation mechanism and common regulatory approach to transmission charging (OJ L 250, 24.9.2010, p. 5).