Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62024CN0901

Case C-901/24, Falucka: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 22 December 2024 – mBank S.A. v TK, DJ and JJ

OJ C, C/2025/1875, 7.4.2025, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1875/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1875/oj

European flag

Official Journal
of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2025/1875

7.4.2025

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 22 December 2024 – mBank S.A. v TK, DJ and JJ

(Case C-901/24, Falucka)  (1)

(C/2025/1875)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: mBank S.A.

Defendants: TK, DJ and JJ

Question referred

Must Article 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (2) and the principles of effectiveness, proportionality, legal certainty and the right to a legal remedy be interpreted as precluding a judicial interpretation of national legislation according to which:

1.

the limitation period for a claim brought by a seller or supplier against a consumer for the recovery of sums unduly paid under a contract which has become invalid as a result of the fact that it contains unfair contract terms is interrupted by the submission, by the consumer, of a declaration stating that he or she is aware that the invalidation of the contract will impose on him or her an obligation to return the sums received from the seller or supplier under the invalid contract,

2.

the submission of such a declaration by a consumer may justify a decision to disregard the expiry of a limitation period for a claim which the seller or supplier is entitled to bring against the consumer?

(1)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

(2)   OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1875/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

Top