Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62024TN0100

Case T-100/24: Action brought on 21 February 2024 — Qx World v EUIPO — Scio International (SCIO THETA)

OJ C, C/2024/2454, 8.4.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2454/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2454/oj

European flag

Official Journal
of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2024/2454

8.4.2024

Action brought on 21 February 2024 — Qx World v EUIPO — Scio International (SCIO THETA)

(Case T-100/24)

(C/2024/2454)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Qx World Kft. (Budapest, Hungary) (represented by: Á. László and A. Cserny, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: SC Scio International SRL (Sânmartin, Romania)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark SCIO THETA — European Union trade mark No 15 490 717

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 December 2023 in joined cases R 1054/2021-4 and R 1080/2021-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

annul the contested decision insofar as it rejected the applicant’s appeal and cross-appeal;

—

remit the case to EUIPO’s Boards of Appeal.

Pleas in law

—

Infringement of Article 67 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

—

Infringement of Article 68(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, as well as of the essential procedural requirement for respect of the applicant’s rights to good administration, a remedy and to be heard.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2454/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

Top