Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62023TN0532

    Case T-532/23: Action brought on 25 August 2023 — Ardigen v EUIPO — bioMérieux (ARDIGEN)

    OJ C, C/2023/143, 16.10.2023, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/143/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/143/oj

    European flag

    Official Journal
    of the European Union

    EN

    Series C

    C/2023/143

    16.10.2023

    Action brought on 25 August 2023 — Ardigen v EUIPO — bioMérieux (ARDIGEN)

    (Case T-532/23)

    (C/2023/143)

    Language in which the application was lodged: Polish

    Parties

    Applicant: Ardigen S.A. (Kraków, Poland) (represented by: T. Gawliczek, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: bioMérieux (Marcy l’Étoile, France)

    Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

    Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

    Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘ARDIGEN’ — Application No 017666397

    Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

    Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 June 2023 in Case R 1524/2022-1

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    annul the contested decision in part (paragraph 3 of the decision) and declare that not all the conditions set out in Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council are satisfied and, consequently, dismiss the opposition and register the trade mark at issue for goods in Class 05 and services in Class 42;

    —

    order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the applicant before the General Court and the costs necessarily incurred by the applicant for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal;

    —

    if the intervener joins the proceedings, order that the intervener should bear its own costs.

    Plea in law

    —

    Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) and Article 47(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

    ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/143/oj

    ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

    Top