EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62024TN0164
Case T-164/24: Action brought on 25 March 2024 – Fashion Box v EUIPO – Ghostthinker (RE:PLAY)
Case T-164/24: Action brought on 25 March 2024 – Fashion Box v EUIPO – Ghostthinker (RE:PLAY)
Case T-164/24: Action brought on 25 March 2024 – Fashion Box v EUIPO – Ghostthinker (RE:PLAY)
OJ C, C/2024/3085, 13.5.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3085/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
Official Journal |
EN C series |
|
C/2024/3085 |
13.5.2024 |
Action brought on 25 March 2024 – Fashion Box v EUIPO – Ghostthinker (RE:PLAY)
(Case T-164/24)
(C/2024/3085)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Fashion Box SpA (Asolo, Italy) (represented by: A. Parassina and A. Giovannardi, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ghostthinker GmbH (Augsburg, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word trade mark RE:PLAY – Application for registration No 18 376 980
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 January 2024 in Case R 424/2023-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
order EUIPO to reject the EUTM application No 18 376 980 for RE:PLAY; |
|
— |
order Ghostthinker GmbH to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 8(5) of the Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
|
— |
Violation of the principles of equal treatment and sound administration. |
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3085/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)