(1)

In accordance with Regulation (EC) No 549/2004, the Member States are to adopt national or functional airspace block (‘FAB’) plans, including binding national targets or targets at the level of FABs, ensuring consistency with the Union-wide performance targets. Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 also provides that the Commission is to assess the consistency of those targets on the basis of the assessment criteria referred to in point (d) of Article 11(6) that Regulation. Detailed rules in this regard have been set out in Implementing Regulation (EU) No 390/2013.

(2)

Belgium, Germany, France, Luxembourg and the Netherlands, as regards Functional Airspace Block Europe Central (‘FABEC’), submitted such a plan to the Commission. Pursuant to Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/347 (3), those Member States revised the plan and the targets included therein. However, by means of Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/259 (4), the Commission established that the revised performance targets concerning the key performance areas of capacity for FABEC as a whole and cost-efficiency for France, Germany and the Netherlands, as well as the appropriate measures included in the revised plan, were still not adequate and that those Member States are to take certain corrective measures leading to further revised performance targets so as to address inconsistencies with the Union-wide targets.

(3)

On 30 January 2017, those Member States submitted a further revised plan, which included further revised performance targets, based on corrective measures where required. Those revised targets and corrective measures were subsequently assessed by the Commission.

(4)

Concerning the key performance area of capacity, the consistency of those targets for en route Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay has been assessed, in accordance with the principle laid down in point 4 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 390/2013, by using the respective FAB reference values for capacity that, when applied, ensure at Union level that the Union-wide performance target is met, calculated by the Network Manager and set out in the Network Operations Plan (2014-2018/2019) in its most recent version. That assessment has demonstrated that those targets are consistent with the relevant Union-wide performance target.

(5)

Concerning the key performance area of cost-efficiency, those targets, expressed in en route determined unit costs, have been assessed, in accordance with the principles laid down in point 5, in conjunction with point 1, of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 390/2013, by taking account of the trend of en route determined unit costs over the second reference period and the combined period of the first and the second reference period (2012-2019), the number of service units (traffic forecast) and the level of en route determined unit costs in comparison to Member States having a similar operational and economic environment. That assessment has demonstrated that those targets are consistent with the relevant Union-wide performance target.

(6)

Therefore, the corrective measures taken by Belgium, Germany, France, Luxembourg and the Netherlands, as regards FABEC, are consistent with Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/259 and the targets concerning the key performance areas of capacity and cost-efficiency included in the revised performance plan submitted by those Member States are consistent with the Union-wide performance targets in those areas for the second reference period (2015-2019). It is appropriate, for reasons of clarity and legal certainty, to establish that finding by means of this Decision and notify the Member States concerned thereof.

(7)

The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Single Sky Committee,