Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62015TN0715

Case T-715/15: Action brought on 4 December 2015 — BBY Solutions v OHIM — Worldwide Sales Corporation España (BEST BUY GEEK SQUAD)

OJ C 59, 15.2.2016, p. 35–36 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

15.2.2016   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 59/35

Action brought on 4 December 2015 — BBY Solutions v OHIM — Worldwide Sales Corporation España (BEST BUY GEEK SQUAD)

(Case T-715/15)

(2016/C 059/40)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: BBY Solutions, Inc. (Minneapolis, United States) (represented by: A. Poulter, Solicitor)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Worldwide Sales Corporation España, SL (Sant Vicenç dels Horts, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘BEST BUY GEEK SQUAD’ — Community trade mark application No 6 064 001

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 September 2015 in Joined Cases R 517/2015-2 and R 437/2015-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

annul the contested decision to the extent that it upheld the opposition;

—

annul the opposition division’s decision dated 22 December 2014 in Opposition No B 1354630 to the extent that it upheld the opposition;

—

accept CTM Application No 6 064 001 for registration;

—

order OHIM to bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant.

Plea in law

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Top