EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 52008AP0486
European Evidence Warrant for the purpose of obtaining objects, documents and data for use in proceedings in criminal matters *European Parliament legislative resolution of 21 October 2008 on the draft Council framework decision on the European Evidence Warrant for the purpose of obtaining objects, documents and data for use in proceedings in criminal matters (13076/2007 — C6-0293/2008 — 2003/0270(CNS)
European Evidence Warrant for the purpose of obtaining objects, documents and data for use in proceedings in criminal matters *European Parliament legislative resolution of 21 October 2008 on the draft Council framework decision on the European Evidence Warrant for the purpose of obtaining objects, documents and data for use in proceedings in criminal matters (13076/2007 — C6-0293/2008 — 2003/0270(CNS)
European Evidence Warrant for the purpose of obtaining objects, documents and data for use in proceedings in criminal matters *European Parliament legislative resolution of 21 October 2008 on the draft Council framework decision on the European Evidence Warrant for the purpose of obtaining objects, documents and data for use in proceedings in criminal matters (13076/2007 — C6-0293/2008 — 2003/0270(CNS)
OJ C 15E, 21.1.2010, p. 99–112
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
21.1.2010 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
CE 15/99 |
Tuesday 21 October 2008
European Evidence Warrant for the purpose of obtaining objects, documents and data for use in proceedings in criminal matters *
P6_TA(2008)0486
European Parliament legislative resolution of 21 October 2008 on the draft Council framework decision on the European Evidence Warrant for the purpose of obtaining objects, documents and data for use in proceedings in criminal matters (13076/2007 — C6-0293/2008 — 2003/0270(CNS))
2010/C 15 E/29
(Consultation procedure — renewed consultation)
The European Parliament,
having regard to Council draft (13076/2007),
having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2003)0688),
having regard to its position of 31 March 2004 (1),
having regard to Article 34(2)(b) of the EU Treaty,
having regard to Article 39(1) of the EU Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0293/2008),
having regard to Rules 93, 51 and 55(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A6-0408/2008),
1. |
Approves the Council draft as amended; |
2. |
Calls on the Commission to alter its proposal accordingly, pursuant to Article 250(2) of the EC Treaty; |
3. |
Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament; |
4. |
Calls on the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to amend its draft substantially; |
5. |
Should this text not be adopted prior to the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, is determined to consider any subsequent proposal by urgent procedure, in close cooperation with the national parliaments; |
6. |
Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
COUNCIL DRAFT |
AMENDMENTS |
||||||||||||
Amendment 1 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Recital 8 |
|||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
Amendment 2 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Recital 9 |
|||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
Amendment 3 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Recital 24a (new) |
|||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
Amendment 4 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Recital 25 |
|||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
Amendment 5 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Recital 25a (new) |
|||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
Amendment 6 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Article 2 — point c |
|||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
Amendment 7 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Article 4 — paragraph 1a (new) |
|||||||||||||
|
1a. The European Evidence Warrant is an instrument available to both the defence and the prosecution. Consequently, both the defence and the prosecution may ask the competent judicial authority to issue a European Evidence Warrant. |
||||||||||||
Amendment 8 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Article 4 — paragraph 6 |
|||||||||||||
6. Notwithstanding paragraph 2, the EEW may, if requested by the issuing authority, also cover taking statements from persons present during the execution of the EEW and directly related to the subject of the EEW. The relevant rules of the executing State applicable to national cases shall also be applicable in respect of the taking of such statements. |
deleted |
||||||||||||
Amendment 9 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Article 7 — paragraph 1 — point ba new |
|||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
Amendment 10 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Article 7 — paragraph 1a (new) |
|||||||||||||
|
The issuing authority shall certify in the warrant that the conditions laid down in the first paragraph have been fulfilled. |
||||||||||||
Amendment 11 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Article 8 — paragraph 2 |
|||||||||||||
2. Each Member State may designate a central authority or, when its legal system so provides, more than one central authority to assist the competent authorities. A Member State may, if necessary as a result of the organisation of its internal judicial system, make its central authority(ies) responsible for the administrative transmission and reception of the EEW as well as for other official correspondence relating thereto. |
2. Each Member State may designate a central authority or, when its legal system so provides, more than one central authority to assist the competent judicial authorities. |
||||||||||||
Amendment 12 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Article 10 — paragraph 3a (new) |
|||||||||||||
|
3a. Anyone affected by an exchange of data carried out in accordance with the present framework decision may claim the right to data protection, including blocking, correction, deletion and access to information pertaining to them, as well as access to any means of redress to which they are entitled under the legislation of the issuing State or the executing State. |
||||||||||||
Amendment 13 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Article 11 — paragraph 4 |
|||||||||||||
4. If the issuing authority is not a judge, a court, an investigating magistrate or a public prosecutor and the EEW has not been validated by one of those authorities in the issuing State, the executing authority may, in the specific case, decide that no search or seizure may be carried out for the purpose of the execution of the EEW. Before so deciding, the executing authority shall consult the competent authority of the issuing State. |
deleted |
||||||||||||
Amendment 14 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Article 11 — paragraph 5 |
|||||||||||||
5. A Member State may, at the time of adoption of this Framework Decision, make a declaration or subsequent notification to the General Secretariat of the Council requiring such validation in all cases where the issuing authority is not a judge, a court, an investigating magistrate or a public prosecutor and where the measures necessary to execute the EEW would have to be ordered or supervised by a judge, a court, an investigating magistrate or a public prosecutor under the law of the executing State in a similar domestic case. |
deleted |
||||||||||||
Amendment 15 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Article 11a (new) |
|||||||||||||
|
Article 11a Safeguards for execution 1. Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the European Evidence Warrant is executed in accordance with the following minimum conditions:
2. Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that, where a search and seizure is considered necessary in order to obtain objects, documents or data, the following minimum safeguards shall apply :
|
||||||||||||
Amendment 16 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Article 12 |
|||||||||||||
The executing authority shall comply with the formalities and procedures expressly indicated by the issuing authority unless otherwise provided in this Framework Decision and provided that such formalities and procedures are not contrary to the fundamental principles of law of the executing State. This Article shall not create an obligation to take coercive measures. |
Without prejudice to Article 11a, the executing authority shall comply with the formalities and procedures expressly indicated by the issuing authority unless otherwise provided in this Framework Decision and provided that such formalities and procedures are not contrary to the fundamental principles of law of the executing State. |
||||||||||||
Amendment 17 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Article 12 — paragraph 1a (new) |
|||||||||||||
|
The issuing authority may also require the executing authority to:
|
||||||||||||
Amendment 18 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Article 13 — paragraph 1 — point aa (new) |
|||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
Amendment 19 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Article 13 — paragraph 1 — point ab (new) |
|||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
Amendment 20 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Article 13 — paragraph 1 — point e |
|||||||||||||
|
deleted |
||||||||||||
Amendment 21 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Article 13 — paragraph 1 — point f |
|||||||||||||
|
deleted |
||||||||||||
Amendment 22 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Article 13 — paragraph 2 |
|||||||||||||
2. The decision to refuse the execution or recognition of the EEW pursuant to paragraph 1 shall be taken by a judge, court, investigating magistrate or public prosecutor in the executing State. Where the EEW has been issued by a judicial authority referred to in Article 2(c)(ii), and the EEW has not been validated by a judge, court, investigating magistrate or public prosecutor in the issuing State, the decision may also be taken by any other judicial authority competent under the law of the executing State if provided for under that law. |
2. The decision to refuse the execution or recognition of the EEW pursuant to paragraph 1 shall be taken by a judge, court, investigating magistrate or public prosecutor in the executing State. |
||||||||||||
Amendment 23 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Article 13 — paragraph 3 |
|||||||||||||
3. Any decision under paragraph 1(f)(i) in relation to offences committed partly within the territory of the executing State, or in a place equivalent to its territory, shall be taken by the competent authorities referred to in paragraph 2 in exceptional circumstances and on a case-by case basis, having regard to the specific circumstances of the case, and in particular to whether a major or essential part of the conduct in question has taken place in the issuing State, whether the EEW relates to an act which is not a criminal offence under the law of the executing State and whether it would be necessary to carry out a search and seizure for the execution of the EEW . |
deleted |
||||||||||||
Amendment 24 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Article 13 — paragraph 4 |
|||||||||||||
4. Where a competent authority considers using the ground for refusal under paragraph 1(f)(i), it shall consult Eurojust before taking the decision. Where a competent authority is not in agreement with Eurojust's opinion, Member States shall ensure that it give the reasons for its decision and that the Council be informed. |
deleted |
||||||||||||
Amendment 25 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Article 13 — paragraph 5 |
|||||||||||||
5. In cases referred to in paragraph 1(a), (g) and (h), before deciding not to recognise or not to execute an EEW, either totally or in part, the competent authority in the executing State shall consult the competent authority in the issuing State, by any appropriate means, and shall, where appropriate, ask it to supply any necessary information without delay. |
5. In cases referred to in paragraph 1(a), (aa), (ab), (g) and (h), before deciding not to recognise or not to execute an EEW, either totally or in part, the competent authority in the executing State shall consult the competent authority in the issuing State, by any appropriate means, and shall, where appropriate, ask it to supply any necessary information without delay. |
||||||||||||
Amendment 26 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Article 14 — paragraph 2 — introductory part |
|||||||||||||
2. If it is necessary to carry out a search or seizure for the execution of the EEW, the following offences , if they are punishable in the issuing State by a custodial sentence or a detention order for a maximum period of at least three years and as they are defined by the law of that State, shall not be subject to verification of double criminality under any circumstances: |
2. If it is necessary to carry out a search or seizure for the execution of the EEW, the following offences as they are defined by the law of the issuing State, shall not be subject to verification of double criminality under any circumstances: |
||||||||||||
Amendment 27 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Article 15 — paragraph 3 |
|||||||||||||
3. Unless either grounds for postponement under Article 16 exist or the executing authority has the objects, documents or data sought already in its possession, the executing authority shall take possession of the objects, documents or data without delay and, without prejudice to paragraph 4, no later than 60 days after the receipt of the EEW by the competent executing authority. |
3. Unless one of the grounds for postponement under Article 16 justifies it or the executing authority has the objects, documents or data sought already in its possession, the executing authority shall take possession of the objects, documents or data as early as possible and no later than 60 days after the receipt of the European Evidence Warrant by the competent executing authority , without prejudice to paragraph 4. |
||||||||||||
Amendment 28 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Article 15 — paragraph 3a (new) |
|||||||||||||
|
3a. In the absence of an action brought in accordance with Article 18 and unless one of the grounds for postponement referred to in Article 16 justifies it, the executing State shall transfer to the issuing State the objects, documents or data obtained by virtue of the European Evidence Warrant, immediately where the latter are already under the control of the executing authority or, where this is not the case, as early as possible and no later than 30 days following the date on which the executing authority takes possession of the evidence. When the objects, documents or data obtained are transferred, the executing authority shall state whether it requires them to be returned to the State of execution as soon as they cease to be needed by the issuing State. |
||||||||||||
Amendment 29 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Article 15 — paragraph 4 |
|||||||||||||
4. When it is not practicable in a specific case for the competent executing authority to meet the deadline set out in paragraphs 2 or 3 respectively , it shall without delay inform the competent authority of the issuing State by any means , giving the reasons for the delay and the estimated time needed for the action to be taken. |
4. When it is not practicable under exceptional circumstances for the competent executing authority to meet the deadline set out in this Article , it shall without delay inform Eurojust and the competent authority of the issuing State in writing , giving the reasons for the delay and the estimated time needed for the action to be taken. |
||||||||||||
Amendment 30 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Article 15 — paragraph 5 |
|||||||||||||
5. Unless a legal remedy is pending in accordance with Article 18 or grounds for postponement under Article 16 exist, the executing State shall without undue delay transfer the objects, documents or data obtained under the EEW to the issuing State. |
deleted |
||||||||||||
Amendment 31 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Article 15 — paragraph 6 |
|||||||||||||
6. When transferring the objects, documents or data obtained, the executing authority shall indicate whether it requires them to be returned to the executing State as soon as they are no longer required by the issuing State. |
deleted |
||||||||||||
Amendment 32 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Article 17a (new) |
|||||||||||||
|
Article 17a Subsequent use of evidence The use of the evidence acquired pursuant to this Framework Decision shall in no way prejudice the rights of the defence in subsequent criminal proceedings. These rights shall be fully respected, in particular as regards the admissibility of the evidence, the obligation to disclose that evidence to the defence and the ability of the defence to challenge that evidence. |
||||||||||||
Amendment 33 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Article 18 — paragraph 1 |
|||||||||||||
1. Member States shall put in place the necessary arrangements to ensure that any interested party, including bona fide third parties, have legal remedies against the recognition and execution of an EEW pursuant to Article 11, in order to preserve their legitimate interests. Member States may limit the legal remedies provided for in this paragraph to cases in which the EEW is executed using coercive measures. The action shall be brought before a court in the executing State in accordance with the law of that State. |
1. Member States shall put in place the necessary arrangements to ensure that any interested party, including bona fide third parties, have legal remedies against the recognition and execution of an EEW pursuant to Article 11, in order to preserve their legitimate interests. The action shall be brought before a court in the executing State in accordance with the law of that State. |
||||||||||||
Amendment 34 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Article 23 — paragraph 1 |
|||||||||||||
1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to comply with the provisions of this Framework Decision by … |
1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to comply with the provisions of this Framework Decision by … and they shall do everything they can to agree before that date on a Framework Decision on procedural rights in criminal proceedings throughout the European Union, taking the European Parliament's opinion into consideration. |
||||||||||||
Amendment 35 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Article 23 — paragraph 1a (new) |
|||||||||||||
|
1a. Member States shall indicate, in a declaration lodged with the Secretariat-General of the Council, the national bodies appointed to act as issuing authorities and executing authorities. |
||||||||||||
Amendment 36 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Article 23 — paragraph 3 |
|||||||||||||
3. Any Member State that intends to transpose the ground for refusal set out in Article 13(1)(f) into its national law shall notify the Secretary General of the Council thereof upon adoption of this Framework Decision by making a declaration. |
deleted |
||||||||||||
Amendment 37 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Article 23 — paragraph 4 |
|||||||||||||
4. Germany may by a declaration reserve its right to make the execution of an EEW subject to verification of double criminality in cases referred to in Article 14(2) relating to terrorism, computer-related crime, racism and xenophobia, sabotage, racketeering and extortion or swindling if it is necessary to carry out a search or seizure for the execution of the EEW, except where the issuing authority has declared that the offence concerned under the law of the issuing State falls within the scope of criteria indicated in the declaration. Should Germany wish to make use of this paragraph, it shall notify a declaration to that effect to the Secretary-General of the Council upon the adoption of this Framework Decision. The declaration shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union. |
deleted |
||||||||||||
Amendment 38 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Article 23 — paragraph 5a (new) |
|||||||||||||
|
5a. Each year, the Commission shall present to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee a report on the application of this Framework Decision, paying special attention to the application of procedural safeguards. |
||||||||||||
Amendment 39 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Article 24 — paragraph 2 |
|||||||||||||
2. At the beginning of every calendar year, Germany shall inform the Council and the Commission of the number of cases in which the ground for non-recognition or non-execution referred to in Article 23(4) was applied in the previous year. |
deleted |
||||||||||||
Amendment 40 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Annex — Section B — point iia (new) |
|||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
Amendment 41 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Annex — Section C — point d |
|||||||||||||
This EEW has been validated by a judge or court, investigating magistrate or a public prosecutor (see sections D and O). |
deleted |
||||||||||||
Amendment 42 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Annex — Section D |
|||||||||||||
|
deleted |
||||||||||||
Amendment 43 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Annex — Section E |
|||||||||||||
|
deleted |
||||||||||||
Amendment 44 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Annex — Section F |
|||||||||||||
|
deleted |
||||||||||||
Amendment 45 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Annex — Section I — Footnote |
|||||||||||||
Where the EEW is addressed to Germany, and according to the declaration made by Germany in accordance with Article 23(4) of the Council Framework Decision 2007/…/JHA (2) of … on the European Evidence Warrant for the purpose of obtaining objects, documents and data for use in proceedings in criminal matters, the issuing authority may additionally complete box N.1 to confirm that the offence(s) fall(s) within the scope of criteria indicated by Germany for this type of offence. |
deleted |
||||||||||||
Amendment 46 |
|||||||||||||
Council draft Annex — Section N — point 1 |
|||||||||||||
Optional information to be given only in relation to Germany:
|
deleted |
(1) OJ C 103 E, 29.4.2004, p. 659.
(2) OJ L …