52017DC0099

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

Brussels, 28.2.2017

COM(2017) 99 final

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

on the application by the Member States of Directive 2000/30/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 June 2000 on the technical roadside inspection of the roadworthiness of Commercial vehicles circulating in the Community

Reporting period 2013-2014

Table of Contents

1.INTRODUCTION

2.DIRECTIVE 2000/30/EC

3.DATA COMMUNICATED BY THE MEMBER STATES

4.CONTENT OF THE INSPECTION

5.STATISTICAL DATA

5.1. Overall number of vehicles checked and their origin

5.2.Prohibited vehicles

5.3.Types of deficiencies and data by Member State

5.4. Prohibited vehicles per vehicle category and per Member State of registration

1. INTRODUCTION

In the interest of road safety, environmental protection and fair competition, European legislation provides for a set of measures to ensure that commercial vehicles on European roads are in appropriate technical condition. These include:

rules on admission to the occupation, which require transport operators to have sufficient financial capacity to ensure the proper maintenance of vehicles (Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009 1 );

periodic roadworthiness tests of vehicles, to be carried out in Member States for vehicles registered on their territory, with a minimum frequency laid down at European level (Directive 2009/40/EC 2 );

technical roadside inspections — the subject of this report — ensuring that commercial vehicles are only used if they are maintained such as to ensure a high level of technical roadworthiness (Directive 2000/30/EC 3 ).

Under Directive 2000/30/EC (further referred to as "the Directive"), commercial vehicles, their trailers and semi-trailers circulating on the territories of the Member States are subject to technical roadside inspections of their roadworthiness, in order to improve road safety and protect the environment.

Article 6 of the Directive sets out, that every two years Member States should provide the Commission with data collected for the previous two years relating to:

the number of commercial vehicles checked, grouped into seven vehicle categories and further grouped by the country of registration;

the items checked as per the Directive; and

the deficiencies discovered.

The Directive lists nine different points (see section 4 below) that can be subject to a technical roadside inspection. If any of the items checked do not comply with the relevant road safety requirements, the use of the vehicle may be prohibited. Every deficiency of the inspected vehicle must be mentioned in the inspection report to be given to the vehicle’s driver. The Directive requires the Commission to submit a report to the Council and the European Parliament on the application of the Directive, based on the data received from the Member States, together with a summary of the results obtained.

In 2014 the European Parliament and the Council revised the rules and procedures for the technical roadside inspection of commercial vehicles. On 3 April 2014 Directive 2014/47/EU 4 was adopted, and must be applied by the Member States from 20th May 2018. The new Directive introduces inter alia the requirement that the total number of initial roadside inspections in the EU will have to correspond to at least 5% of the total number of these vehicles registered in the Member States. The first reporting obligation when this target will have to be taken into account will be due by 31 March 2021 for the years 2019-2020.

2. DIRECTIVE 2000/30/EC

According to Directive 2009/40/EC 5 on roadworthiness tests for motor vehicles and their trailers vehicles used for commercial purposes have to be tested annually. However as the annual test is considered not to be sufficient to guarantee that these vehicles stay in a roadworthy condition throughout the year, it is necessary to apply targeted additional roadside inspections as an enforcement measure.

The Directive as amended 6 - which is applicable until 19 May 2018 - sets out a number of conditions for the technical roadside inspections of commercial vehicles circulating in the EU.

Directive 2010/47/EU amended the vehicle categories and the list of items in Annex I of the Directive as from 01 January 2012.

Before the amendment vehicles on the roadside inspection report (Annex I) were defined by classes e.g. road train which meant any motor vehicle for the carriage of goods with a maximum mass exceeding 3,5 t (categories N2 and N3) coupled to a trailer (categories O3 and O4). At the same time vehicles of the category N2 had to be indicated under "light goods vehicle", category N3 vehicles under "lorry" while categories O3 and O4 vehicles under "trailer" and "semi-trailer".

The amendment of Directive 2010/47/EU however introduced a different way of grouping of the vehicles by using their category designation according to the type-approval legislation. As a result a vehicle which might have been indicated in different classes can now be only indicated in one vehicle category. Furthermore the towing vehicle and the trailer have to be indicated separately. Taking into account that the towing vehicle and the trailer can be registered in different Member States such division provides more accurate information and is also important for the obligation to notify the Member State of registration in case serious deficiencies were found on one of the vehicles.

A technical roadside inspection means an unannounced examination of a commercial vehicle circulating within the territory of a Member State. The inspection is carried out mainly on the public highway by the authorities or another body, acting under their supervision.

All technical roadside inspections must be carried out without discrimination on grounds of the driver’s nationality or the country in which the commercial vehicle is registered or entered into service. They must also be undertaken such as to minimise the costs and delay for drivers and operators.

A targeted approach should be adopted in selecting commercial vehicles for technical roadside inspection, placing particular importance on identifying vehicles that seem most likely to be poorly maintained.

Roadside inspections are usually carried out in a stepwise approach. First a visual assessment of the vehicle’s maintenance condition is carried out when stationary accompanied by the check of the documentation on the vehicle's recent roadside inspection and roadworthiness test. A detailed inspection for irregularities based on the list of items of the Directive may be also conducted on the spot or at a testing centre in the vicinity. In the case of a detailed inspection the outcome of the roadside inspection must be documented in a technical roadside inspection report that follows the model set out by the Directive. This information provides the basis for the information Member States are required to communicate to the Commission.

If a commercial vehicle with dangerous deficiencies presents a serious risk to road safety, its use may be prohibited until these deficiencies have been rectified. Foreign vehicles with serious deficiencies must be notified to the Member State of registration to allow for appropriate follow-up.

3. DATA COMMUNICATED BY THE MEMBER STATES

This is the fifth report on how Directive 2000/30/EC is applied in the Member States and it covers the period 2013-2014. The data collected by Member States relating to this period was supposed to be provided to the Commission by 31 March 2015 at the latest.

In order to facilitate the reporting obligation of the Member States the Commission sent out an information letter at the beginning of March 2015 accompanied by a template table. This template was developed together by the Commission and Member State experts to facilitate the collection and the reporting of the very complex data set; however, its use is not obligatory. Every Member State which fulfilled its obligation made use of the template and submitted the data in an electronic version which made the further analysis significantly easier.

The data, however, were not always communicated in a timely manner. 18 Member States (Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Greece, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, the United Kingdom) provided data on the number of vehicles checked, grouped by category and country of registration, as well as data on items checked and defects noted. Following discussions between the Commission and the remaining 10 Member States, 8 provided the required data. In the course of the dialogues with France and Germany however it has been identified that these Member States are not able to provide the required data in line with the requirements of the Directive.

France communicated only cumulated data concerning the two categories of heavy goods vehicles (N2 and N3) and for the two categories of buses (M2 and M3) instead of separating them. Furthermore France did not provide any information on trailers (categories O3 and O4). Consequently only the total numbers were used for this report, and for the comparison of the details the data provided by France were disregarded.

Germany at the same time used the vehicle classes which were in force before the amendments of Directive 2010/47/EU were introduced and could not provide the data according to the vehicle categories as required by the amendments. As a result the details for the vehicle categories cannot be identified therefore only the total numbers are used for this report.

Member States provided the data with varying levels of completeness. Austria, the Czech Republic, Romania, the Netherlands, Greece, Luxemburg, Poland and Croatia submitted data also on vehicles registered outside the EU classified by the country of registration while Belgium and Italy provided a data summary for non-EU countries.

4. CONTENT OF THE INSPECTION

The points likely to be checked and to be included in the data sent by Member States are, at a minimum, those referred to in point 10 of the specimen report set out in Annex I to Directive 2000/30/EC. These are:

identification;

braking equipment;

steering;

visibility;

lighting equipment and electric system;

axles, wheels, tyres, suspension;

chassis and chassis attachments;

other equipment, including tachograph and speed limitation devices;

nuisance including emissions and spillage of fuel and/or oil.

5. STATISTICAL DATA

5.1. Overall number of vehicles checked and their origin

According to Article 3 of Directive 2000/30/EC the inspections must be carried out without any discrimination either on grounds of the driver’s nationality or the country of registration.

Compared to the previous period 2.561.820 fewer checks have been carried out in 2013-2014 which is a decrease of 31,5%.

An outstanding change can be observed in the data reported by Finland which does not include checks of vehicles outside the EU and as a result the total number of checks was halved compared to the previous period and the proportion of the vehicles registered in Finland increased by 30%.

Though Poland also reported data for non-EU countries, the total number of checks was half that of the previous period. At the same time, the rate of checked Polish vehicles decreased from 92,1% to 47,3% which means that Poland put more emphasis on checking foreign vehicles especially registered in a non-EU country considering that the number of these checks is five times higher than that in 2011-2012.

Belgium and Luxembourg reported higher proportions of foreign vehicles having been subject to roadside inspection as was already the case in the two previous periods (2011-2012 and 2009-2010). 7 Other Member States with significant transit traffic reported a more balanced distribution of checks on domestic and foreign vehicles. Due to their geographical position Cyprus and Ireland reported only locally registered vehicles, and a very high rate of domestic vehicles can also be observed in Malta, Estonia and Romania.

Table 2: Origin of vehicles checked

Reporting Member State (MS)	Registered in the MS	Registered in another MS	Registered outside the EU	Total	Vehicles of the MS (%)
Belgium	6,203	11,287	583	18,073	34.3 %
Bulgaria	254,651	65,752	922	321,325	79.3 %
Czech Republic	81,711	51,945	3,325	136,981	59.7 %
Denmark	1,748	333		2,081	84.0 %
Germany	989,524	541,168	70,036	1,600,728	61,8%
Estonia	1,669	20		1,689	98.8 %
Ireland	12,939			12,939	100.0 %
Greece	14,922	1,424	470	16,816	88.7 %
Spain	652,259	70,991		723,250	90.2 %
France*	460,918	572,841	19,933	1,053,692	43,7%
Italy	10,153	4,576	414	15,143	67.0 %
Cyprus	1,174			1,174	100.0 %
Latvia	4,196	1,711	194	6,101	68.8 %
Lithuania	64,531	15,329		79,860	80.8 %
Luxembourg	125	584	17	726	17.2 %
Hungary	164,307	52,197		216,504	75.9 %
Malta	3,968	44		4,012	98.9 %
Netherlands	4,373	4,256	231	8,860	49.4 %
Austria	23,416	23,932	1,536	48,884	47.9 %
Poland	420,147	74,007	393,957	888,111	47.3 %
Portugal	602	29		631	95.4 %
Romania	7,404	516	215	8,135	91.0 %
Slovenia	3,948	1,165		5,113	77.2 %
Slovakia	11,135	5,076		16,211	68.7 %
Finland	9,250	1,902		11,152	82.9 %
Sweden	46,059	7,468		53,527	86.0 %
United Kingdom	174,678	118,160		292,838	59.7 %
Total	3,455,127	1,629,421	499,616	5,584,164	61.9 %

* France has not reported data on trailer categories O3, O4

5.2. Prohibited vehicles

Vehicles with dangerous deficiencies that present a serious risk to its occupants or other road users may be prohibited from further use until those deficiencies have been rectified. According to the information sent by Member States, the proportion of vehicles prohibited in relation to all vehicles checked varies considerably from one Member State to another, from a high of 90.1 % in Estonia to just 0.2 % in the Czech Republic and even 0% in Portugal.

The rates of the prohibitions applied to vehicles registered domestically as opposed to those registered in other Member States indicate that domestic vehicles are likely to be more poorly maintained while vehicles sent abroad are kept in better condition. Significant differences can be found in Estonia with 90.1% of prohibitions of domestic vehicles and 45% of prohibitions of vehicles from other Member States. The same rates in Sweden are 82.3% to 39.6%, in Malta 48.7% to 13.6% while in Italy 44.6% to 26.1%.

Austria reported relatively high but at the same time a balanced prohibitions rate of both domestic 55.9% and foreign vehicles 58.7%. The figures seem to indicate that Austria target poorly maintained vehicles more successfully which increases operational effectiveness and decreases administrative burden. Some Member States like Estonia (90.1% to 45%), Finland (56% to 34.9%) or Italy (44.6% to 26.1%) are more successful in targeting domestic vehicles while the prohibition rate of vehicles registered in other Member States show that poorly maintained vehicles become less likely to be subject to a roadside inspection. Notably low prohibition rates of both domestic and foreign vehicles as in the Czech Republic 0.5% to 0.2%, Bulgaria 1.7% to 2.3%, Latvia 0.7% to 1.1%, Lithuania 1% to 2% or the Netherlands 1.2% to 1.3% indicate that the targeting method of commercial vehicles is rather undeveloped.

Compared to the prohibition rates of the previous period, the results suggest impressive development of the targeting method in some Member States. The overall prohibition rate for the EU of Sweden for the period 2011-2012 was 17.8% while for the current period it is 76.4%. Italy reported also significant improvement with only 12.9% for the previous and 38.9% for the current period while the figures of Slovakia are 22.6% and 38%. Nevertheless the figures indicate a substantial relapse in Romania where the prohibition rate decreased from 39.9% to 4.3%, in Luxemburg from 58.9% to 4.4%. In Ireland the decrease is 37.4% with a prohibition rate of 43.4% for the previous and 6% for the current period, taking also into account that Ireland reported exclusively checks of domestic vehicles for both periods. The reasons for the decrease of the prohibition rates are unknown to the Commission.

The ratio of prohibitions in Estonia (90,1%) Sweden (82,3%) and in Cyprus (146,4%) indicates possible differences not only in the testing methods and the assessment of the deficiencies but also in the compilation method of the report in the Member States. In the case of Cyprus where more bans than inspected vehicles were reported, presumably if several deficiencies leading to a ban were found on a vehicle, these deficiencies were reported as separate bans. It should also be noted that although according to the Directive the "number of commercial vehicles checked" is to be communicated, the same vehicle can be inspected by the same Member State more than once during the covered period, which results in the report containing in fact the "number of the inspections carried out".

Table 3: Proportion of prohibited vehicles in relation to all EU vehicles checked

Reporting Member State	Vehicles registered in the reporting Member State			Vehicles registered in the EU (including reporting Member State)
	Number of vehicles checked	Number of prohibitions	Ratio of prohibitions (%)	Number of vehicles checked	Number of prohibitions	Ratio of prohibitions (%)
Belgium	6,203	452	7.3 %	17,490	972	5.6 %
Bulgaria	254,651	4,319	1.7 %	320,403	5,804	1.8 %
Czech Republic	81,711	402	0.5 %	133,656	507	0.4 %
Denmark	1,748	432	24.7 %	2,081	532	25.6 %
Germany	989,524	13,628	1.4 %	1,530,962	32,125	2.1 %
Estonia	1,669	1,504	90.1 %	1,689	1,513	89.6 %
Ireland	12,939	779	6.0 %	12,939	779	6.0 %
Greece	14,922	202	1.4 %	16,346	228	1.4 %
Spain	652,259	79,872	12.2 %	723,250	83,280	11.5 %
France*	460,918	77,327	16.7 %	1,033,759	165,465	16.0 %
Italy	10,153	4,533	44.6 %	14,729	5,728	38.9 %
Cyprus	1,174	1,719	146.4 %	1,174	1,719	146.4 %
Latvia	4,196	28	0.7 %	5,907	47	0.8 %
Lithuania	64,531	625	1.0 %	79,860	933	1.2 %
Luxembourg	125	8	6.4 %	709	31	4.4 %
Hungary	164,307	2,955	1.8 %	216,504	5,651	2.6 %
Malta	3,968	1,931	48.7 %	4,012	1,937	48.3 %
Netherlands	4,373	51	1.2 %	8,629	107	1.2 %
Austria	23,416	13,078	55.9 %	47,348	27,123	57.3 %
Poland	420,147	28,697	6.8 %	494,154	29,740	6.0 %
Portugal	602	11	1.8 %	631	11	1.7 %
Romania	7,404	326	4.4 %	7,920	342	4.3 %
Slovenia	3,948	386	9.8 %	5,113	477	9.3 %
Slovakia	11,135	4,738	42.6 %	16,211	6,154	38.0 %
Finland	9,250	5,177	56.0 %	11,152	5,840	52.4 %
Sweden	46,059	37,917	82.3 %	53,527	40,871	76.4 %
United Kingdom	174,678	37,310	21.4 %	292,838	80,283	27.4 %
Total	3,455,127	319,420	9.2 %	5,084,818	499,837	9.8 %

* France has not reported data on trailer categories O3, O4

Table 4: Proportion of prohibited domestic vehicles in relation to other EU vehicles checked

Reporting Member State	Vehicles registered in the reporting Member State			Vehicles registered in the EU (excluding the reporting Member State)
	Number of vehicles checked	Number of prohibitions	Ratio of prohibitions (%)	Number of vehicles checked	Number of prohibitions	Ratio of prohibitions (%)
Belgium	6,203	452	7.3 %	11,287	520	4.6%
Bulgaria	254,651	4,319	1.7 %	65,752	1,485	2.3%
Czech Republic	81,711	402	0.5 %	51,945	105	0.2%
Denmark	1,748	432	24.7 %	333	100	30.0%
Germany	989,524	13,628	1.4 %	541,438	18,497	3.4%
Estonia	1,669	1,504	90.1 %	20	9	45.0%
Ireland	12,939	779	6.0 %	0	0	N.A.
Greece	14,922	202	1.4 %	1,424	26	1.8%
Spain	652,259	79,872	12.2 %	70,991	3,408	4.8%
France*	460,918	77,327	16.7 %	572,841	88,138	15.4%
Italy	10,153	4,533	44.6 %	4,576	1,195	26.1%
Cyprus	1,174	1,719	146.4 %	0	0	N.A.
Latvia	4,196	28	0.7 %	1,711	19	1.1%
Lithuania	64,531	625	1.0 %	15,329	308	2.0%
Luxembourg	125	8	6.4 %	584	23	3.9%
Hungary	164,307	2,955	1.8 %	52,197	2,696	5.2%
Malta	3,968	1,931	48.7 %	44	6	13.6%
Netherlands	4,373	51	1.2 %	4,256	56	1.3%
Austria	23,416	13,078	55.9 %	23,932	14,045	58.7%
Poland	420,147	28,697	6.8 %	74,007	1,043	1.4%
Portugal	602	11	1.8 %	29	0	0.0%
Romania	7,404	326	4.4 %	516	16	3.1%
Slovenia	3,948	386	9.8 %	1,165	91	7.8%
Slovakia	11,135	4,738	42.6 %	5,076	1,416	27.9%
Finland	9,250	5,177	56.0 %	1,902	663	34.9%
Sweden	46,059	37,917	82.3 %	7,468	2,954	39.6%
United Kingdom	174,678	37,310	21.4 %	118,160	42,973	36.4%
Total	3,455,127	319,420	9.2 %	2,743,970	286,642	10.4%

* France has not reported data on trailer categories O3, O4

5.3. Types of deficiencies and data by Member State

Annex I shows the rate of deficiencies found on vehicles during the inspections carried out by the same Member State.

The most frequent deficiencies detected during inspections concern the roadworthiness condition of:

- lighting equipment and electric system (20,9%);

- axles, wheels, tyres, suspension (20,6 %);

- braking equipment (18,8%); and

- other equipment including tachograph and speed limitation device (17,4%).

Within the different items to be tested, considerable differences in deficiency rates were reported. The reason for this may be the different testing methods applied by Member States and the emphasis put on the inspection of specific items during the inspection. When it becomes applicable, Directive 2014/47/EU will introduce greater harmonisation in testing methods, assessment of deficiencies and use of test equipment for more detailed technical roadside inspections.

Comparing the figures with those of the previous period, a remarkable decrease is showed concerning the deficiencies found in the lighting equipment and electric system (from 47% to 20,9%). However, on closer examination of the figures, some striking results can be noted. In 47,3% of the inspections in Sweden and in 45,4% in Portugal deficiencies were found on the lighting equipment and electric system. The previous period shows nearly the same rates in these Member States (Sweden 49%, Portugal 50,7%).

Defective braking equipment appears to be found most often by the authorities in Denmark (46,7%), in the United Kingdom (34,3%) and in Poland (31,8%). At the same time Greece found 1,6% of the vehicles defective in this respect, while Estonia and Luxemburg found 2,9% and Spain found none (0%).

For deficiencies relating to emissions and leakages — which, in addition to being a road safety hazard, can also have an impact on the environment — after a decrease over the previous period of 3,1% (from 4,1 % to 1,0 %) an increase of 3,2% (4,2%) is shown. Vehicles with this defect were found most often in Lithuania (14,6%) and in Cyprus (10,6%). It needs to be mentioned that Cyprus only inspected domestic vehicles during this period.

Annex I shows further results of the inspections and the deficiencies found by the Member State of inspection.

Data submitted by Member States on the number of inspections made on vehicles registered in non-EU countries are still not sufficient to draw significant conclusions on their roadworthiness.

Annex IV of this report provides an overview of the number of vehicles checked in Member States by country of registration and the ratio of prohibitions issued.

5.4. Prohibited vehicles per vehicle category and per Member State of registration

Annex II shows how often the vehicles coming from a given Member State were found with defects which led to a prohibition. As regards the vehicles per category, heavy trucks (category N3) were prohibited most often, in 13,6% of the inspections in total. Trailers belonging to the category O3 were found to have a defect in the smallest proportion (6,8%). It needs to be highlighted that vehicles belonging to the not further specified 'other' category were found in 22,2% of the cases with such severe defects that a prohibition had to be applied. Vehicles checked under this category are usually agricultural vehicles, light trailers (O1, O2) or light vans (N1). Directive 2014/47/EU will make the inspection of high-speed tractors (T5) obligatory in cases where they are used mainly on public roads for commercial haulage purposes.

The total number of prohibitions per Member State show that Swedish (80,9%) and Finnish (53,2%) vehicles were most often found with serious defects, while Greek (2,2%) and Latvian (2,8%) only rarely. It needs to be taken into account however that from the 47.046 inspections carried out on Swedish vehicles 46.059 (97,9%) were carried out by Swedish authorities, while from the 10.573 inspections on Finnish vehicles 9.520 (90%) were carried out within Finland. On the other hand 29.360 Greek vehicles were inspected all over Europe and 50,8% (14.922) of it was carried out in Greece, while the same comparison for Latvia shows that Latvian vehicles were in 80% of the cases inspected by other Member States (20.955 inspected vehicle, 4.196 inspected by Latvia).

On the one hand, the figures of Annex II interpreted with Table 4 show which Member States' vehicles are used and therefore inspected more frequently in other Member States. On the other hand the particular high proportion of prohibited domestic vehicles might be caused by the different testing methods and the difference in the assessment of the defects. Concerning the latter Directive 2014/47/EU will introduce greater harmonisation not only in the testing methods but also in the assessment of deficiencies and the use of test equipment for more detailed technical inspections.

Further details per vehicle category per Member State of registration can be found in Annex II. Annex III shows the details per vehicle category per Member State of the inspection.

6. TYPES OF PENALTIES

The Directive does not set out a system of penalties for any infringements discovered. Penalties are to be set by Member States, without discrimination on the grounds of the driver’s nationality or of the country in which the vehicle was registered or entered into service.

If it becomes evident that a commercial vehicle presents a serious risk to its occupants or other road users, the authority or inspector carrying out the inspection is empowered under Directive 2000/30/EC to prohibit the use of a vehicle until the dangerous deficiencies discovered have been rectified.

Serious deficiencies found in a commercial vehicle belonging to a nonresident, in particular those that lead to its use being prohibited, must be notified to the competent authorities of the Member State where it is registered.

The competent authorities of the Member State that found the serious deficiency may ask the competent authorities of the Member State where the vehicle is registered to take appropriate measures, such as subjecting the vehicle to a further roadworthiness inspection. However, no reporting is required on such cases.

7. SUMMARY CONCLUSIONS

The Member States' compliance with the reporting obligation has improved although the deadline was still not met in many cases despite the information letter sent out by the Commission at the beginning of March 2015. In some cases the report was only provided following discussions between the Commission and the relevant Member State authorities. In most cases, Member States made use of the standardised electronic format recommended by the Commission for submitting their report. In the case of France and Germany clarification attempts revealed that the reports could not be provided as the Member States were not fully compliant with the Directive.

Several conclusions can be drawn from this report on roadside inspections of commercial vehicles circulating within the EU.

A remarkable change compared to the previous period is that 2.561.820 fewer checks were carried out in 2013-2014 which is a decrease of 31,5%. This might be the result of a more efficient targeting of possibly defective vehicles or a decrease in the resources in the Member States available for roadside inspections.

The proportion of domestic vehicles out of the total number of vehicles checked also varies substantially in the Member States. Further efforts should therefore be made to ensure a more balanced rate of inspections. In Belgium and in Luxembourg for example, domestic vehicles were inspected in fewer than 40% of cases whereas in other transit Member States the proportion is more balanced.

The proportion of vehicles prohibited in relation to all inspected vehicles shows sizeable variations, from 0,4 % in the Czech Republic and 0,8 % in Latvia to more than 89,6 % in Estonia and 76,4 % in Sweden. The figures reported suggest that the efficiency of technical roadside inspections can be increased by better targeting the checks that are carried out. The time lost by the transport operators and the administrative burden both for them and for the enforcement authorities could also be reduced with better targeting. As of 2018 the new roadside inspection Directive 2014/47/EU requires Member States to adjust their inspection systems, moving from carrying out purely random checking to a more targeted approach.

The most frequent deficiencies detected during inspections concern the roadworthy condition of lighting equipment, wheels, tyres and braking. However, significant variations in these deficiency rates can be seen across Member States. The European Commission encourages Member States to pay particular attention to the categories of deficiencies that continue to be most problematic and to adjust the inspection methods they use accordingly.

(1) Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 on common rules for access to the international road haulage market (recast), OJ L 300, 14.11.2009, p. 72.

(2) Directive 2009/40/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 on roadworthiness tests for motor vehicles and their trailers (Recast), OJ L 141, 6.6.2009, p. 12.

(3) Directive 2000/30/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 June 2000 on the technical roadside inspection of the roadworthiness of commercial vehicles circulating in the Community, OJ L 203, 10.8.2000, p. 1.

(4) Directive 2014/47/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on the technical roadside inspection of the roadworthiness of commercial vehicles circulating in the Union, OJ L 127, 29.4.2014, p. 134.

(5) Directive 2009/40/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 on roadworthiness tests for motor vehicles and their trailers, OJ L 141, 6.6.2009, P. 12.

(6) Commission Directive 2010/47/EU of 5 July 2010 adapting to technical progress Directive 2000/30/EC, OJ L 173, 8.7.2010, p. 33.

(7) COM(2013) 303; COM(2014) 569

Top

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

Brussels, 28.2.2017

COM(2017) 99 final

ANNEXES

to the

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

ANNEX 1: DEFICIENCIES DETECTED PER INSPECTED ITEM

Compared to the sum of all detected deficiencies on vehicles per Member State of inspection

MS of inspection	identification	Pct.	braking equipment	Pct.	steering	Pct.	visibility	Pct.	lighting equipment and electric system	Pct.	chassis and chassis attachments	Pct.	other equipment including tachograph and speed limitation device	Pct.	nuisance including emissions and spillage of fuel and/or oil	Pct.	axles-wheels-tyres-suspension	Pct.	Sum:
AT	127	0.4 %	6,565	21.3 %	1,444	4.7 %	1,625	5.3 %	5,802	18.9 %	3,558	11.6 %	1,047	3.4 %	2,640	8.6 %	7,945	25.8 %	30,753
BE	68	1.2 %	897	16.2 %	55	1.0 %	831	15.0 %	1,872	33.7 %	1,120	20.2 %	147	2.6 %	20	0.4 %	538	9.7 %	5,548
BG	35	0.6 %	898	15.5 %	18	0.3 %	770	13.3 %	740	12.7 %	74	1.3 %	1,399	24.1 %	1	0.0 %	1,872	32.2 %	5,807
CY	0	0.0 %	160	9.3 %	53	3.1 %	121	7.0 %	329	19.1 %	454	26.4 %	83	4.8 %	183	10.6 %	336	19.5 %	1,719
CZ	2,776	2.1 %	35,123	27.1 %	18,027	13.9 %	17,484	13.5 %	24,182	18.6 %	13,385	10.3 %	2,533	2.0 %	5,252	4.0 %	10,926	8.4 %	129,688
DK	17	0.9 %	905	46.7 %	7	0.4 %	423	21.8 %	228	11.8 %	201	10.4 %	7	0.4 %	9	0.5 %	139	7.2 %	1,936
EE	49	2.2 %	66	2.9 %	45	2.0 %	496	22.0 %	443	19.6 %	199	8.8 %	418	18.5 %	188	8.3 %	355	15.7 %	2,259
EL	1	0.2 %	9	1.6 %	4	0.7 %	18	3.3 %	123	22.3 %	25	4.5 %	84	15.2 %	28	5.1 %	259	47.0 %	551
ES	2,969	3.6 %	4	0.0 %	9	0.0 %	485	0.6 %	921	1.1 %	0	0.0 %	63,183	75.9 %	121	0.1 %	15,588	18.7 %	83,280
FI	253	2.6 %	2,347	23.8 %	570	5.8 %	628	6.4 %	2,724	27.7 %	1,822	18.5 %	318	3.2 %	147	1.5 %	1,034	10.5 %	9,843
HR	19	0.6 %	489	15.1 %	170	5.2 %	82	2.5 %	668	20.6 %	286	8.8 %	412	12.7 %	211	6.5 %	910	28.0 %	3,247
HU	276	1.7 %	1,828	11.2 %	215	1.3 %	795	4.9 %	4,998	30.7 %	2,730	16.8 %	802	4.9 %	1,096	6.7 %	3,538	21.7 %	16,278
IE	1,748	11.2 %	2,197	14.0 %	932	6.0 %	1,302	8.3 %	4,355	27.8 %	1,735	11.1 %	444	2.8 %	323	2.1 %	2,609	16.7 %	15,645
IT	0	0.0 %	1,461	24.0 %	355	5.8 %	0	0.0 %	1,647	27.0 %	624	10.2 %	239	3.9 %	116	1.9 %	1,648	27.1 %	6,090
LT	257	3.1 %	546	6.5 %	114	1.4 %	435	5.2 %	3,185	37.9 %	379	4.5 %	1,092	13.0 %	1,225	14.6 %	1,163	13.9 %	8,396
LU	129	21.0 %	18	2.9 %	77	12.5 %	148	24.1 %	127	20.7 %	30	4.9 %	27	4.4 %	19	3.1 %	40	6.5 %	615
LV	4	0.2 %	494	30.6 %	59	3.7 %	46	2.9 %	393	24.4 %	291	18.0 %	40	2.5 %	86	5.3 %	200	12.4 %	1,613
MT	308	5.5 %	298	5.4 %	433	7.8 %	783	14.1 %	2,071	37.2 %	540	9.7 %	15	0.3 %	434	7.8 %	683	12.3 %	5,565
NL	637	12.6 %	833	16.5 %	139	2.8 %	177	3.5 %	974	19.3 %	855	16.9 %	250	4.9 %	123	2.4 %	1,065	21.1 %	5,053
PL	1,257	1.6 %	24,786	31.8 %	2,416	3.1 %	4,122	5.3 %	18,461	23.7 %	2,681	3.4 %	2,167	2.8 %	4,395	5.6 %	17,569	22.6 %	77,854
PT	12	1.3 %	51	5.7 %	41	4.6 %	1	0.1 %	408	45.4 %	60	6.7 %	29	3.2 %	58	6.5 %	238	26.5 %	898
RO	4	0.4 %	132	14.6 %	4	0.4 %	246	27.2 %	212	23.4 %	17	1.9 %	17	1.9 %	8	0.9 %	266	29.4 %	906
SE	4,567	7.5 %	5,532	9.1 %	1,376	2.3 %	5,551	9.1 %	28,857	47.3 %	5,276	8.7 %	1,981	3.2 %	789	1.3 %	7,027	11.5 %	60,956
SI	10	3.6 %	28	10.1 %	13	4.7 %	30	10.8 %	44	15.9 %	16	5.8 %	58	20.9 %	5	1.8 %	73	26.4 %	277
SK	355	5.4 %	882	13.3 %	7	0.1 %	188	2.8 %	732	11.1 %	51	0.8 %	2,240	33.9 %	345	5.2 %	1,811	27.4 %	6,611
UK	1,752	1.8 %	33,296	34.3 %	3,810	3.9 %	1,496	1.5 %	13,670	14.1 %	10,486	10.8 %	599	0.6 %	5,939	6.1 %	26,001	26.8 %	97,049
Sum:	17,630	3.0 %	119,845	20.7 %	30,393	5.3 %	38,283	6.6 %	118,166	20.4 %	46,895	8.1 %	79,631	13.8 %	23,761	4.1 %	103,833	18.0 %	578,437

ANNEX 2. PROHIBITED VEHICLES PER VEHICLE CATEGORY AND PER MEMBER STATE OF REGISTRATION

				N2			N3			O3			O4			M2			M3			Other
Member State of registration	Total Vehicles	Total Prohibitions	Pct.	Number of Vehicles	Number of Prohibitions	Pct.	Number of Vehicles	Number of Prohibitions	Pct.	Number of Vehicles	Number of Prohibitions	Pct.	Number of Vehicles	Number of Prohibitions	Pct.	Number of Vehicles	Number of Prohibitions	Pct.	Number of Vehicles	Number of Prohibitions	Pct.	Number of Vehicles	Number of Prohibitions	Pct.
AT	28,323	13,329	47.1 %	2,173	1,058	48.7 %	8,996	3,246	36.1 %	102	39	38.2 %	6,307	1,439	22.8 %	37	5	13.5 %	164	19	11.6 %	10,544	7,523	71.3 %
BE	11,671	1,696	14.5 %	316	32	10.1 %	4,516	431	9.5 %	44	5	11.4 %	6,097	1,175	19.3 %	37	1	2.7 %	504	24	4.8 %	157	28	17.8 %
BG	278,451	9,893	3.6 %	28,229	974	3.5 %	116,553	4,147	3.6 %	7,604	107	1.4 %	76,133	2,519	3.3 %	15,925	528	3.3 %	25,284	844	3.3 %	8,723	774	8.9 %
CY	1,543	1,776	115.1 %	395	614	155.4 %	547	603	110.2 %	112	175	156.3 %	258	221	85.7 %	81	54	66.7 %	138	107	77.5 %	12	2	16.7 %
CZ	107,875	4,321	4.0 %	20,444	487	2.4 %	46,913	1,537	3.3 %	1,345	20	1.5 %	35,574	1,480	4.2 %	61	2	3.3 %	1,250	42	3.4 %	2,288	753	32.9 %
DE	26,884	2,860	10.6 %	1,788	227	12.7 %	8,811	933	10.6 %	159	13	8.2 %	13,183	1,224	9.3 %	962	14	1.5 %	955	51	5.3 %	1,026	398	38.8 %
DK	4,133	994	24.1 %	48	9	18.8 %	1,330	177	13.3 %	37	3	8.1 %	2,261	594	26.3 %	11	0	0.0 %	199	52	26.1 %	247	159	64.4 %
EE	8,974	2,140	23.8 %	167	37	22.2 %	4,058	1,011	24.9 %	121	9	7.4 %	3,140	316	10.1 %	39	23	59.0 %	174	49	28.2 %	1,275	695	54.5 %
EL	29,360	647	2.2 %	4,516	62	1.4 %	12,074	242	2.0 %	26	0	0.0 %	10,758	204	1.9 %	87	11	12.6 %	1,793	107	6.0 %	106	21	19.8 %
ES	668,122	85,666	12.8 %	10,576	1,811	17.1 %	368,179	72,037	19.6 %	38	1	2.6 %	261,522	7,412	2.8 %	49	10	20.4 %	27,578	4,353	15.8 %	180	42	23.3 %
FI	10,573	5,627	53.2 %	421	258	61.3 %	5,390	3,038	56.4 %	213	94	44.1 %	4,443	2,192	49.3 %	8	2	25.0 %	23	8	34.8 %	75	35	46.7 %
FR	7,779	1,308	16.8 %	111	18	16.2 %	3,018	409	13.6 %	25	0	0.0 %	3,200	678	21.2 %	35	2	5.7 %	425	59	13.9 %	965	142	14.7 %
HR	30,662	1,316	4.3 %	6,651	209	3.1 %	17,092	604	3.5 %	86	3	3.5 %	2,459	124	5.0 %	186	3	1.6 %	3,570	268	7.5 %	618	105	17.0 %
HU	191,778	8,150	4.2 %	13,120	1,016	7.7 %	91,374	3,064	3.4 %	977	71	7.3 %	64,315	2,581	4.0 %	313	12	3.8 %	1,622	173	10.7 %	20,057	1,233	6.1 %
IE	23,953	4,813	20.1 %	949	72	7.6 %	15,847	2,472	15.6 %	6	0	0.0 %	5,861	2,186	37.3 %	277	8	2.9 %	389	20	5.1 %	624	55	8.8 %
IT	18,151	6,436	35.5 %	1,514	607	40.1 %	3,506	755	21.5 %	462	242	52.4 %	4,150	1,101	26.5 %	2,923	1,310	44.8 %	1,180	504	42.7 %	4,416	1,917	43.4 %
LT	107,119	3,470	3.2 %	9,641	79	0.8 %	47,160	1,650	3.5 %	4,141	66	1.6 %	31,328	1,474	4.7 %	2,749	36	1.3 %	2,701	71	2.6 %	9,399	94	1.0 %
LU	1,000	84	8.4 %	29	3	10.3 %	478	35	7.3 %	5	0	0.0 %	316	29	9.2 %	83	6	7.2 %	58	3	5.2 %	31	8	25.8 %
LV	20,955	591	2.8 %	1,212	21	1.7 %	9,815	297	3.0 %	381	10	2.6 %	7,424	231	3.1 %	69	2	2.9 %	431	7	1.6 %	1,623	23	1.4 %
MT	4,173	2,003	48.0 %	844	348	41.2 %	1,362	649	47.7 %	0	0	0.0 %	362	196	54.1 %	63	22	34.9 %	874	573	65.6 %	668	215	32.2 %
NL	18,843	3,066	16.3 %	285	33	11.6 %	7,634	950	12.4 %	120	4	3.3 %	10,335	2,010	19.4 %	26	1	3.8 %	233	20	8.6 %	210	48	22.9 %
PL	506,865	39,697	7.8 %	51,077	3,732	7.3 %	174,317	15,485	8.9 %	4,458	307	6.9 %	117,461	8,905	7.6 %	13,068	1,263	9.7 %	81,926	4,560	5.6 %	64,558	5,445	8.4 %
PT	44,420	3,813	8.6 %	163	14	8.6 %	22,425	2,396	10.7 %	6	0	0.0 %	21,129	1,297	6.1 %	17	2	11.8 %	612	93	15.2 %	68	11	16.2 %
RO	85,159	12,357	14.5 %	4,268	762	17.9 %	42,198	5,654	13.4 %	286	20	7.0 %	33,147	4,318	13.0 %	645	51	7.9 %	1,619	160	9.9 %	2,996	1,392	46.5 %
SE	47,046	38,072	80.9 %	575	519	90.3 %	9,941	9,059	91.1 %	116	100	86.2 %	7,333	6,266	85.4 %	100	91	91.0 %	543	450	82.9 %	28,438	21,587	75.9 %
SI	13,377	2,333	17.4 %	687	128	18.6 %	5,446	807	14.8 %	79	104	131.6 %	3,640	1,055	29.0 %	273	7	2.6 %	2,752	52	1.9 %	500	180	36.0 %
SK	46,574	7,862	16.9 %	7,018	2,042	29.1 %	20,212	2,797	13.8 %	478	61	12.8 %	14,224	1,345	9.5 %	549	204	37.2 %	559	181	32.4 %	3,534	1,232	34.9 %
UK	176,303	37,516	21.3 %	21,368	6,962	32.6 %	55,740	15,558	27.9 %	5	3	60.0 %	29,609	9,181	31.0 %	4,439	892	20.1 %	22,217	3,256	14.7 %	42,925	1,664	3.9 %
total	2,520,066	301,836	12.0%	188,585	22,134	11.7%	1,104,932	150,043	13.6%	21,432	1,457	6.8%	775,969	61,753	8.0%	43,112	4,562	10.6%	179,773	16,106	9.0%	206,263	45,781	22.2%

ANNEX 3. PROHIBITED VEHICLES PER VEHICLE CATEGORY AND PER MEMBER STATE OF INSPECTION

				N2			N3			O3			O4			M2			M3			Other
Member State of inspection	Total Vehicles	Total Prohibitions	Pct.	Number of Vehicles	Number of Prohibitions	Pct.	Number of Vehicles	Number of Prohibitions	Pct.	Number of Vehicles	Number of Prohibitions	Pct.	Number of Vehicles	Number of Prohibitions	Pct.	Number of Vehicles	Number of Prohibitions	Pct.	Number of Vehicles	Number of Prohibitions	Pct.	Number of Vehicles	Number of Prohibitions	Pct.
AT	48,884	28,114	57.5 %	4,134	2,602	62.9 %	16,363	7,870	48.1 %	312	159	51.0 %	11,999	5,491	45.8 %	17	11	64.7 %	469	304	64.8 %	15,590	11,677	74.9 %
BE	18,073	997	5.5 %	271	14	5.2 %	9,070	307	3.4 %	78	6	7.7 %	8,104	640	7.9 %	1	0	0.0 %	499	18	3.6 %	50	12	24.0 %
BG	321,325	5,807	1.8 %	30,805	876	2.8 %	136,221	2,715	2.0 %	7,466	79	1.1 %	96,529	979	1.0 %	15,755	406	2.6 %	27,363	696	2.5 %	7,186	56	0.8 %
CY	1,174	1,719	146.4 %	388	613	158.0 %	370	582	157.3 %	112	175	156.3 %	92	190	206.5 %	81	54	66.7 %	131	105	80.2 %	0	0	0.0 %
CZ	136,981	514	0.4 %	24,093			61,442			1,680			47,221			27			1,694			824	514	62.4 %
DK	2,081	532	25.6 %	4	1	25.0 %	857	22	2.6 %	5	2	40.0 %	809	295	36.5 %	6			200	61	30.5 %	200	151	75.5 %
EE	1,689	1,513	89.6 %	29	25	86.2 %	687	631	91.8 %	0	0	0.0 %	110	99	90.0 %	23	23	100.0 %	49	46	93.9 %	791	689	87.1 %
EL	16,816	252	1.5 %	3,258	39	1.2 %	6,366	49	0.8 %	33			6,135	111	1.8 %	40	1	2.5 %	931	49	5.3 %	53	3	5.7 %
ES	723,250	83,280	11.5 %	11,132	1,857	16.7 %	396,003	73,292	18.5 %	0	0	0.0 %	287,705	3,624	1.3 %	0	0	0.0 %	28,410	4,507	15.9 %	0	0	0.0 %
FI	11,152	5,840	52.4 %	449	278	61.9 %	5,619	3,061	54.5 %	271	120	44.3 %	4,725	2,333	49.4 %	6	2	33.3 %	12	7	58.3 %	70	39	55.7 %
HR	39,608	1,643	4.1 %	7,145	193	2.7 %	23,002	820	3.6 %	88	2	2.3 %	2,404	43	1.8 %	292	5	1.7 %	6,187	530	8.6 %	490	50	10.2 %
HU	216,504	5,651	2.6 %	12,425	535	4.3 %	104,807	2,333	2.2 %	993	24	2.4 %	76,790	1,858	2.4 %	331	10	3.0 %	1,458	125	8.6 %	19,700	766	3.9 %
IE	12,939	779	6.0 %	795	40	5.0 %	10,510	670	6.4 %	6	0	0.0 %	524	7	1.3 %	272	6	2.2 %	362	13	3.6 %	470	43	9.1 %
IT	15,143	6,090	40.2 %	1,324	584	44.1 %	124	81	65.3 %	569	291	51.1 %	121	44	36.4 %	3,741	1,579	42.2 %	1,907	960	50.3 %	7,357	2,551	34.7 %
LT	79,860	933	1.2 %	10,216	60	0.6 %	33,872	456	1.3 %	4,153	65	1.6 %	18,880	232	1.2 %	2,787	28	1.0 %	2,645	64	2.4 %	7,307	28	0.4 %
LU	726	31	4.3 %	70	2	2.9 %	1			2			28			327	12	3.7 %	298	17	5.7 %			0.0 %
LV	6,101	52	0.9 %	478	3	0.6 %	3,230	14	0.4 %	46			2,347	35	1.5 %	0		0.0 %	0		0.0 %			0.0 %
MT	4,012	1,937	48.3 %	844	348	41.2 %	1,284	631	49.1 %	0	0	0.0 %	289	149	51.6 %	62	22	35.5 %	874	573	65.6 %	659	214	32.5 %
NL	8,860	111	1.3 %	186	5	2.7 %	4,226	32	0.8 %	136	4	2.9 %	4,158	68	1.6 %	1	0	0.0 %	116	1	0.9 %	37	1	2.7 %
PL	888,111	32,969	3.7 %	139,697	3,594	2.6 %	310,735	12,088	3.9 %	6,634	304	4.6 %	237,495	5,831	2.5 %	23,911	1,247	5.2 %	90,057	4,723	5.2 %	79,582	5,182	6.5 %
PT	631	11	1.7 %	44			341	1	0.3 %			0.0 %	225	10	4.4 %			0.0 %	21					0.0 %
RO	8,135	357	4.4 %	1,304	12	0.9 %	3,562	97	2.7 %	46	2	4.3 %	2,595	230	8.9 %	344	7	2.0 %	243	8	3.3 %	41	1	2.4 %
SE	53,527	40,871	76.4 %	615	547	88.9 %	14,221	10,916	76.8 %	142	113	79.6 %	9,356	7,147	76.4 %	95	92	96.8 %	508	441	86.8 %	28,590	21,615	75.6 %
SI	5,113	477	9.3 %	505	21	4.2 %	1,480	82	5.5 %	38	98	257.9 %	320	251	78.4 %	237	1	0.4 %	2,448	21	0.9 %	85	3	3.5 %
SK	16,211	6,154	38.0 %	6,893	2,601	37.7 %	4,505	1,712	38.0 %	243	73	30.0 %	971	252	26.0 %	648	264	40.7 %	304	156	51.3 %	2,647	1,096	41.4 %
UK	292,838	80,283	27.4 %	22,835	7,605	33.3 %	113,257	33,225	29.3 %	0	0	0.0 %	85,839	33,620	39.2 %	4,450	901	20.2 %	22,567	3,327	14.7 %	43,890	1,605	3.7 %
total	2,929,744	306,917	10.5%	279,939	22,455	8.0%	1,262,155	151,687	12.0%	23,053	1,517	6.6%	905,771	63,539	7.0%	53,454	4,671	8.7%	189,753	16,752	8.8%	215,619	46,296	21.5%

* Because the non-compliant report, the table does not contain data sent by France and Germany.

ANNEX 4: VEHICLES CHECKED AND PROHIBITION RATE BY MEMBER STATE

MS of registration	Member State of inspection (number of inspections carried out; prohibition %)
	AT	%	BE	%	BG	%	CY	%	CZ	%	DK	%	EE	%	EL	%	ES	%
AD		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
AL	13	75.0 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.	2	0.0 %		N.A.		N.A.	152	13.0 %		N.A.
AT	23,416	79.9 %	104	6.9 %	827	0.0 %		N.A.	834	0.5 %	2	N.A.		N.A.		N.A.	292	10.2 %
AZ	1	0.0 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
BA	268	99.5 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.	140	0.0 %		N.A.		N.A.	4	N.A.		N.A.
BE	62	55.8 %	6,203	13.7 %	128	6.1 %		N.A.	93	0.0 %	2	100.0 %		N.A.	1	0.0 %	590	8.3 %
BG	1,500	102.2 %	355	23.1 %	254,651	2.5 %		N.A.	1,160	0.2 %	26	366.7 %		N.A.	1,336	2.7 %	3,376	12.8 %
BO	1	100.0 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
BY	66	100.0 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.	350	0.0 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
CH	136	67.0 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.	24	0.0 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
CS	374	87.4 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
CY	22	110.0 %	11	20.0 %	196	1.0 %	1,174	172.4 %	10	0.0 %	0	0.0 %		N.A.		N.A.	15	9.1 %
CZ	2,977	85.1 %	540	11.6 %	3,018	2.9 %		N.A.	81,711	0.8 %	12	50.0 %		N.A.	4	0.0 %	1,575	6.3 %
DE	2,362	61.6 %	1,192	4.6 %	1,772	2.8 %		N.A.	3,347	0.1 %	67	3.3 %		N.A.	13	N.A.	1,581	17.2 %
DK	41	40.5 %	47	5.3 %	354	1.7 %		N.A.	94	0.0 %	1,748	39.8 %		N.A.		N.A.	91	7.7 %
EE	30	114.3 %	46	14.3 %	603	0.0 %		N.A.	229	0.9 %	4	100.0 %	1,669	147.9 %		N.A.	200	5.2 %
EL	108	135.7 %	18	16.7 %	13,497	2.2 %		N.A.	72	0.0 %	0	0.0 %		N.A.	14,922	2.2 %	163	9.9 %
ES	112	71.6 %	696	13.1 %	140	0.0 %		N.A.	512	0.0 %	4	100.0 %		N.A.		N.A.	652,259	27.4 %
FI	14	54.5 %	13	12.5 %	52	6.5 %		N.A.	50	0.0 %	10	57.1 %	3	33.3 %		N.A.	121	12.1 %
FR	72	84.1 %	1,071	9.9 %	223	1.7 %		N.A.	80	0.0 %	0	0.0 %		N.A.		N.A.	2,032	17.9 %
GE	15	128.6 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
HR	479	91.1 %	65	2.8 %		N.A.		N.A.	237	0.0 %		N.A.		N.A.	2	N.A.		N.A.
HU	4,738	91.3 %	415	6.7 %	6,607	2.9 %		N.A.	3,788	0.3 %	10	75.0 %		N.A.	2	0.0 %	1,043	7.3 %
IE	18	86.7 %	61	2.3 %	24	0.0 %		N.A.	35	0.0 %	0	0.0 %		N.A.		N.A.	456	8.6 %
IQ		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
IR	11	44.4 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
IS		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.	1	0.0 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
IT	1,115	70.1 %	295	5.1 %	460	6.4 %		N.A.	286	0.0 %	0	0.0 %		N.A.	2	0.0 %	1,355	14.7 %
KZ	2	400.0 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
LI	16	88.9 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
LT	346	95.5 %	530	10.2 %	1,208	2.5 %		N.A.	1,756	0.1 %	23	70.0 %	1	0.0 %		N.A.	3,565	2.8 %
LU	18	50.0 %	422	3.6 %	0	0.0 %		N.A.	39	0.0 %	0	0.0 %		N.A.		N.A.	156	8.9 %
LV	72	83.3 %	71	10.7 %	1,133	2.6 %		N.A.	711	0.3 %	6	150.0 %	10	200.0 %		N.A.	500	1.6 %
MA		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
MC		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
MD	72	85.1 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.	41	0.0 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
ME	2	100.0 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.	8	0.0 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
MK	73	119.0 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.	224	0.0 %		N.A.		N.A.	27	0.0 %		N.A.
MT	3	100.0 %	6	0.0 %	0	0.0 %		N.A.	9	0.0 %	0	0.0 %		N.A.		N.A.	0	0.0 %
NL	345	74.5 %	1,812	8.8 %	792	0.8 %		N.A.	592	0.2 %	18	60.0 %		N.A.	1	N.A.	1,629	9.3 %
NO	3	50.0 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.	4	0.0 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
PL	2,108	88.7 %	1,589	11.0 %	8,856	4.1 %		N.A.	22,226	0.5 %	67	158.8 %	4	0.0 %	10	N.A.	4,910	6.7 %
PT	65	117.6 %	298	14.0 %	105	0.0 %		N.A.	244	0.8 %	5	N.A.		N.A.		N.A.	37,862	8.8 %
RO	3,462	108.1 %	768	13.2 %	23,950	6.9 %		N.A.	4,491	0.3 %	15	166.7 %		N.A.	49	14.0 %	7,369	13.3 %
RS	1	100.0 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.	999	0.2 %		N.A.		N.A.	6	0.0 %		N.A.
RU	59	110.0 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.	315	0.0 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
SE	29	45.5 %	23	20.0 %	46	0.0 %		N.A.	107	0.0 %	45	45.5 %	2	100.0 %	2	N.A.	87	14.3 %
SI	1,533	106.0 %	193	6.7 %		N.A.		N.A.	430	1.3 %	0	0.0 %		N.A.		N.A.	366	9.2 %
SK	2,167	109.1 %	497	10.3 %	1,530	2.5 %		N.A.	10,479	0.4 %	16	100.0 %		N.A.	2	N.A.	765	4.8 %
SL		N.A.		N.A.	922	0.7 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.	2	N.A.		N.A.
SV	2	100.0 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
TM		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
TR	263	98.5 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.	763	0.3 %		N.A.		N.A.	279	4.0 %		N.A.
UA	123	119.8 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.	402	1.7 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
UK	119	85.2 %	149	7.0 %	108	0.0 %		N.A.	34	5.0 %	1	N.A.		N.A.		N.A.	892	18.9 %
US	5	20.0 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
UZ		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
XK	19	105.9 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.

MS of registration	Member State of inspection (number of inspections carried out; prohibition %)
	FI	%	HR	%	HU	%	IE	%	IT	%	LT	%	LU	%	LV	%	MT	%
AD		N.A.	8	66.7 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
AL		N.A.	55	10.0 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
AT	0	0.0 %	48	16.1 %	1,623	1.2 %	0	0.0 %	79	7.7 %	0	0.0 %	7	N.A.	0	0.0 %	2	0.0 %
AZ		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
BA		N.A.	4,178	9.7 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
BE	13	14.3 %	5	20.0 %	70	3.2 %	0	0.0 %	220	8.0 %	5	N.A.	58	3.6 %	0	0.0 %	0	0.0 %
BG	0	0.0 %	633	30.8 %	2,610	10.9 %	0	0.0 %	864	52.9 %	72	2.6 %	26	2.5 %	12	N.A.	0	0.0 %
BO		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
BY		N.A.	6	0.0 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.	17	N.A.		N.A.
CH		N.A.	3	0.0 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.	2	N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
CS		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
CY	0	0.0 %	1	0.0 %	5	0.0 %	0	0.0 %	14	28.6 %	0	0.0 %	2	N.A.	0	0.0 %	0	0.0 %
CZ	28	44.4 %	73	4.4 %	2,910	5.4 %	0	0.0 %	96	7.3 %	94	9.1 %	16	N.A.	12	N.A.	0	0.0 %
DE	110	21.2 %	77	5.5 %	809	4.1 %	0	0.0 %	117	17.1 %	188	1.2 %	127	1.2 %	14	N.A.	2	0.0 %
DK	59	18.3 %	0	0.0 %	40	5.0 %	0	0.0 %	15	5.9 %	97	4.3 %	3	33.3 %	25	N.A.	0	0.0 %
EE	717	63.9 %	2	0.0 %	44	4.8 %	0	0.0 %	12	16.7 %	1,353	1.9 %	4	N.A.	264	0.8 %	0	0.0 %
EL	0	0.0 %	22	22.2 %	58	0.0 %	0	0.0 %	102	48.4 %	0	0.0 %	6	N.A.	0	0.0 %	0	0.0 %
ES	0	0.0 %	3	0.0 %	203	4.2 %	0	0.0 %	139	32.1 %	2	N.A.	56	3.8 %	0	0.0 %	0	0.0 %
FI	9,250	111.1 %	1	0.0 %	49	2.1 %	0	0.0 %	5	33.3 %	72	N.A.	3	N.A.	18	N.A.	0	0.0 %
FR	0	0.0 %	1	0.0 %	70	16.7 %	0	0.0 %	967	11.3 %	2	N.A.	30	4.7 %	0	0.0 %	0	0.0 %
GE		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
HR		N.A.	29,117	7.9 %		N.A.		N.A.	32	13.2 %		N.A.	4	N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
HU	16	33.3 %	178	15.7 %	164,307	3.4 %	0	0.0 %	234	8.9 %	47	N.A.	10	N.A.	4	N.A.	0	0.0 %
IE	2	100.0 %	0	0.0 %	22	6.7 %	12,939	28.8 %	29	3.3 %	1	N.A.	0	0.0 %	0	0.0 %	0	0.0 %
IQ		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
IR		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
IS		N.A.	1	0.0 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
IT	4	50.0 %	67	15.9 %	583	6.0 %	0	0.0 %	10,153	33.8 %	2	N.A.	17	N.A.	5	N.A.	9	133.3 %
KZ		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.	2	N.A.		N.A.
LI		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
LT	179	73.6 %	5	0.0 %	731	2.2 %	0	0.0 %	141	9.8 %	64,531	1.4 %	17	3.7 %	912	2.4 %	0	0.0 %
LU	0	0.0 %	0	0.0 %	16	0.0 %	0	0.0 %	49	15.3 %	1	N.A.	125	4.0 %	0	0.0 %	0	0.0 %
LV	131	59.2 %	0	0.0 %	290	2.2 %	0	0.0 %	38	2.5 %	5,192	1.5 %	5	N.A.	4,196	1.5 %	0	0.0 %
MA		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
MC		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
MD		N.A.	1	0.0 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
ME		N.A.	150	34.8 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
MK		N.A.	524	26.4 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.	4	N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
MT	0	0.0 %	0	0.0 %	1	0.0 %	0	0.0 %	10	9.1 %	0	0.0 %	0	0.0 %	0	0.0 %	3,968	69.7 %
NL	66	27.5 %	7	0.0 %	328	1.9 %	0	0.0 %	107	14.6 %	26	N.A.	32	N.A.	15	N.A.	10	0.0 %
NO		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
PL	372	85.3 %	124	18.8 %	10,954	4.2 %	0	0.0 %	349	13.0 %	7,906	4.7 %	60	3.3 %	398	2.6 %	5	50.0 %
PT	0	0.0 %	0	0.0 %	9	25.0 %	0	0.0 %	50	15.5 %	0	0.0 %	16	8.0 %	0	0.0 %	0	0.0 %
RO	26	63.6 %	148	40.0 %	18,035	21.4 %	0	0.0 %	446	19.9 %	60	9.7 %	59	4.6 %	6	N.A.	0	0.0 %
RS		N.A.	2,267	15.3 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.	1	N.A.	5	N.A.		N.A.
RU		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.	4	N.A.	135	8.9 %		N.A.
SE	156	52.8 %	1	0.0 %	71	0.0 %	0	0.0 %	3	0.0 %	37	3.1 %	1	N.A.	10	N.A.	0	0.0 %
SI	6	33.3 %	1,219	16.5 %	2,510	4.4 %	0	0.0 %	137	21.9 %	12	N.A.	9	N.A.	0	0.0 %	0	0.0 %
SK	17	33.3 %	62	19.4 %	10,132	4.7 %	0	0.0 %	236	8.3 %	72	5.3 %	16	4.0 %	15	25.0 %	0	0.0 %
SL		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
SV		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
TM		N.A.	1	0.0 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
TR		N.A.	565	24.6 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.	6	N.A.	1	N.A.		N.A.
UA		N.A.	7	0.0 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.	28	N.A.		N.A.
UK	0	0.0 %	0	0.0 %	24	22.2 %	0	0.0 %	85	7.2 %	15	N.A.	0	0.0 %	0	0.0 %	16	12.5 %
US		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
UZ		N.A.	1	0.0 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
XK		N.A.	9	0.0 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.

MS of registration	Member State of inspection (number of inspections carried out; prohibition %)
	NL	%	PL	%	PT	%	RO	%	SE	%	SI	%	SK	%	UK	%
AD		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
AL		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
AT	30	0.0 %	228	1.0 %	0	0.0 %	7	0.0 %	22	83.3 %	22	0.0 %	208	23.5 %	545	36.5 %
AZ		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
BA	20	18.2 %	421	1.3 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
BE	508	2.4 %	513	0.2 %	0	0.0 %	0	0.0 %	29	50.0 %	1	0.0 %	0	0.0 %	3,170	50.7 %
BG	185	5.0 %	2,286	3.5 %	0	0.0 %	208	9.9 %	1,116	212.7 %	92	34.6 %	430	48.4 %	7,513	90.6 %
BO		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
BY	21	0.0 %	20,019	6.3 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
CH	7	0.0 %	18	0.0 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
CS		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
CY	5	0.0 %		N.A.	0	0.0 %	0	0.0 %	1	0.0 %	0	0.0 %	0	0.0 %	87	88.6 %
CZ	199	2.1 %	8,373	3.7 %	0	0.0 %	24	0.0 %	224	75.8 %	34	25.0 %	761	34.2 %	5,168	65.9 %
DE	512	1.4 %	9,099	0.4 %	2	N.A.	0	0.0 %	266	119.0 %	8	0.0 %	193	33.9 %	5,000	42.0 %
DK	105	1.1 %	234	0.6 %	0	0.0 %	0	0.0 %	722	79.5 %	2	0.0 %	1	0.0 %	449	40.3 %
EE	57	4.0 %	2,973	1.8 %	0	0.0 %	2	0.0 %	413	188.4 %	0	0.0 %	1	0.0 %	350	53.9 %
EL	22	0.0 %	37	0.0 %	0	0.0 %	2	0.0 %	2	100.0 %	0	0.0 %	0	0.0 %	329	79.3 %
ES	280	2.6 %	473	3.6 %	25	N.A.	0	0.0 %	46	95.8 %	0	0.0 %	5	N.A.	13,162	81.5 %
FI	46	3.3 %	147	1.7 %	0	0.0 %	0	0.0 %	651	141.9 %	0	0.0 %	1	N.A.	43	29.4 %
FR	47	0.0 %	410	0.0 %	2	N.A.	0	0.0 %	19	35.3 %	1	0.0 %	1	0.0 %	2,739	53.3 %
GE	2	0.0 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
HR	26	0.0 %	697	2.5 %		N.A.	3	0.0 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
HU	133	1.9 %	3,739	1.6 %	0	0.0 %	91	2.1 %	83	93.9 %	233	13.6 %	925	41.8 %	5,161	69.4 %
IE	48	0.0 %	32	0.0 %	0	0.0 %	0	0.0 %	6	20.0 %	0	0.0 %	1	N.A.	10,269	77.0 %
IQ	2	0.0 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
IR		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
IS		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
IT	85	2.1 %	191	3.4 %	0	0.0 %	0	0.0 %	8	42.9 %	44	58.8 %	54	31.7 %	3,408	64.2 %
KZ	2	0.0 %	377	27.7 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
LI		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
LT	257	1.7 %	26,453	2.4 %	0	0.0 %	8	0.0 %	511	85.7 %	14	0.0 %	17	N.A.	5,908	66.7 %
LU	11	0.0 %	10	0.0 %	0	0.0 %	0	0.0 %	2	0.0 %	0	0.0 %	0	0.0 %	151	65.3 %
LV	78	0.0 %	7,580	2.7 %	0	0.0 %	0	0.0 %	234	139.7 %	4	0.0 %	88	19.1 %	595	53.6 %
MA	1	0.0 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
MC	1	0.0 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
MD		N.A.	934	9.4 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
ME	1	0.0 %	60	4.9 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
MK	6	0.0 %	804	3.7 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
MT	7	0.0 %		N.A.	0	0.0 %	0	0.0 %	0	0.0 %	0	0.0 %	0	0.0 %	168	83.1 %
NL	4,373	2.1 %	673	1.6 %	0	0.0 %	8	25.0 %	330	89.4 %	1	0.0 %	39	72.7 %	7,639	49.9 %
NO	1	0.0 %	28	5.0 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
PL	907	3.2 %	420,147	9.4 %	0	0.0 %	148	2.7 %	2,253	78.0 %	233	12.5 %	1,505	26.8 %	21,734	72.3 %
PT	148	4.1 %	123	1.4 %	602	4.0 %	0	0.0 %	33	66.7 %	4	0.0 %	0	0.0 %	4,848	91.5 %
RO	271	5.6 %	3,717	4.3 %	0	0.0 %	7,404	7.1 %	313	98.1 %	362	19.5 %	718	40.8 %	13,489	97.4 %
RS	15	12.5 %	2,490	4.2 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
RU	29	0.0 %	332,212	0.8 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
SE	30	4.3 %	165	0.8 %	0	0.0 %	0	0.0 %	46,059	103.6 %	2	0.0 %	4	N.A.	164	39.8 %
SI	54	0.0 %	884	2.2 %	0	0.0 %	0	0.0 %	53	111.1 %	3,948	11.4 %	91	38.6 %	1,932	77.3 %
SK	138	8.5 %	4,934	3.1 %	0	0.0 %	15	12.5 %	98	80.0 %	108	10.9 %	11,135	55.3 %	4,139	71.8 %
SL		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
SV		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
TM		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
TR	80	0.0 %	2,540	2.3 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
UA	43	4.5 %	34,054	3.0 %		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
UK	67	2.6 %	36	0.0 %	0	0.0 %	0	0.0 %	33	50.0 %	0	0.0 %	6	16.7 %	174,678	30.1 %
US		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
UZ		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.
XK		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.		N.A.

Top

Choose the experimental features you want to try