EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013FA0109
Case F-109/13: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 3 December 2014 — DG v ENISA (Civil service — Temporary staff — Termination of contract — No statement of reasons — Failure to comply with the reports procedure — Manifest error of assessment)
Case F-109/13: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 3 December 2014 — DG v ENISA (Civil service — Temporary staff — Termination of contract — No statement of reasons — Failure to comply with the reports procedure — Manifest error of assessment)
Case F-109/13: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 3 December 2014 — DG v ENISA (Civil service — Temporary staff — Termination of contract — No statement of reasons — Failure to comply with the reports procedure — Manifest error of assessment)
OJ C 26, 26.1.2015, p. 43–44
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
26.1.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 26/43 |
Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 3 December 2014 — DG v ENISA
(Case F-109/13) (1)
((Civil service - Temporary staff - Termination of contract - No statement of reasons - Failure to comply with the reports procedure - Manifest error of assessment))
(2015/C 026/56)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: DG (represented by: L. Levi and A. Tymen, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Agency for Network and Information Security (represented initially by P. Empadinhas, acting as Agent, and by C. Meidanis, lawyer, and subsequently by P. Empadinhas and S. Purser, acting as Agents, and by C. Meidanis, lawyer)
Re:
Application to annul the decision to dismiss the applicant, to order her reinstatement and the payment of the financial benefits that should have been paid to her from the end of her contract, after deduction of any income received during the same period, together with interest calculated at 3 points above the rate fixed by the ECB, and for compensation for the non-material damage allegedly suffered.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
|
1) |
Dismisses the action. |
|
2) |
Declares that DG is to bear her own costs and orders her to pay the costs incurred by the European Union Agency for Network and Information Security. |
(1) OJ C 15, 18.1.2014, p. 21.