This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62012TN0377
Case T-377/12: Action brought on 22 August 2012 — Spa Monopole v OHIM
Case T-377/12: Action brought on 22 August 2012 — Spa Monopole v OHIM
Case T-377/12: Action brought on 22 August 2012 — Spa Monopole v OHIM
OJ C 331, 27.10.2012, pp. 27–28
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
27.10.2012 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 331/27 |
Action brought on 22 August 2012 — Spa Monopole v OHIM
(Case T-377/12)
(2012/C 331/52)
Language in which the application was lodged: French
Parties
Applicant: Spa Monopole, compagnie fermière de Spa SA/NV (Spa, Belgium) (represented by: L. De Brouwer, E. Cornu and É. De Gryse, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Olivar Del Desierto, SL (Almería, Spain)
Form of order sought
|
— |
annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 22 June 2012 in Case R 135/2011-4; |
|
— |
order the defendant to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
Applicant for a Community trade mark: Olivar Del Desierto, SL.
Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark comprising the word element ‘OLEOSPA’ for goods and services in Classes 3, 35 and 39 — registration application No 7 268 832.
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Applicant
Mark or sign cited in opposition: Benelux word marks ‘SPA’ for goods in Classes 3 and 32
Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld.
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal upheld and opposition rejected.
Pleas in law:
|
— |
Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
|
— |
Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009. |