This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62012CN0057
Case C-57/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour constitutionnelle (Belgium) lodged on 3 February 2012 — Fédération des maisons de repos privées de Belgique (Femarbel) ASBL v Commission communautaire commune
Case C-57/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour constitutionnelle (Belgium) lodged on 3 February 2012 — Fédération des maisons de repos privées de Belgique (Femarbel) ASBL v Commission communautaire commune
Case C-57/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour constitutionnelle (Belgium) lodged on 3 February 2012 — Fédération des maisons de repos privées de Belgique (Femarbel) ASBL v Commission communautaire commune
OJ C 118, 21.4.2012, p. 12–12
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
21.4.2012 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 118/12 |
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour constitutionnelle (Belgium) lodged on 3 February 2012 — Fédération des maisons de repos privées de Belgique (Femarbel) ASBL v Commission communautaire commune
(Case C-57/12)
2012/C 118/19
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Cour constitutionnelle
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Fédération des maisons de repos privées de Belgique (Femarbel) ASBL
Defendant: Commission communautaire commune
Question referred
Must the healthcare services referred to in Article 2(2)(f) and the social services referred to in Article 2(2)(j) of Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market (1) be interpreted in such a way as to exclude from the scope of the Directive day-care centres within the meaning of the ordinance of the Commission communautaire commune of 24 April 2008 on establishments receiving or accommodating old people, in so far as they provide assistance and care appropriate to the loss of independence of old people, and likewise night-care centres within the meaning of the same ordinance, in so far as they provided health assistance and care that cannot be given to old people by their close relatives on a continuous basis?