EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62012CB0248

Case C-248/12 P: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 March 2014  — Northern Ireland Department of Agriculture and Rural Development v European Commission (Appeal — EAGGF, EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from European Union financing — Admissibility of the action for annulment — Situation of the appellant not directly affected by the contested decision)

OJ C 184, 16.6.2014, p. 2–2 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

16.6.2014   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/2


Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 March 2014 — Northern Ireland Department of Agriculture and Rural Development v European Commission

(Case C-248/12 P) (1)

((Appeal - EAGGF, EAGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from European Union financing - Admissibility of the action for annulment - Situation of the appellant not directly affected by the contested decision))

2014/C 184/02

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Northern Ireland Department of Agriculture and Rural Development (represented by: K. Brown, Solicitor)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: N. Donnelly and P. Rossi, Agents)

Re:

Appeal against the Order of 6 March 2012 in Case T-453/10 Northern Ireland Department of Agriculture and Rural Development v Commission, by which the General Court (Eighth Chamber) dismissed as inadmissible an action for partial annulment of Commission Decision 2010/399/EU (notified under No C(2010) 4894) of 15 July 2010 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2010 L 184, p. 6), to the extent that it excludes certain expenditure incurred by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Operative part of the order

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

2.

Orders the Northern Ireland Department of Agriculture and Rural Development to pay the costs of this appeal.


(1)  OJ C 200, 7.7.2012.


Top