This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TJ0686
Judgment of the General Court (Appeal Chamber) of 19 October 2017.
Daniele Possanzini v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.
Appeal — Civil service — Temporary staff — 2009 appraisal procedure — Powers of the countersigning officer — Amendment of the reporting officer’s primary assessment by the countersigning officer — Preliminary consultation meeting between the countersigning officer and the reporting officer — Infringement of essential procedural requirements — Examination of the Court’s own motion.
Case T-686/16 P.
Judgment of the General Court (Appeal Chamber) of 19 October 2017.
Daniele Possanzini v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.
Appeal — Civil service — Temporary staff — 2009 appraisal procedure — Powers of the countersigning officer — Amendment of the reporting officer’s primary assessment by the countersigning officer — Preliminary consultation meeting between the countersigning officer and the reporting officer — Infringement of essential procedural requirements — Examination of the Court’s own motion.
Case T-686/16 P.
Judgment of the General Court (Appeal Chamber) of 19 October 2017 — Possanzini v Frontex
(Case T‑686/16 P)
(Appeal — Civil service — Temporary staff — 2009 appraisal procedure — Powers of the countersigning officer — Amendment of the reporting officer’s primary assessment by the countersigning officer — Preliminary consultation meeting between the countersigning officer and the reporting officer — Infringement of essential procedural requirements — Examination of the Court’s own motion)
|
1. |
Officials—Reports procedure—Appraisal report—Guidelines for reporting officers and members of staff on staff appraisal procedures—Legal effects (Staff Regulations, Art. 43) (see para. 43) |
|
2. |
Appeal—Grounds—Inadequate statement of reasons—Scope of the obligation to state reasons—Ground involving a question of public policy—Considered of Court’s own motion (Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 117) (see paras 57, 58) |
|
3. |
Actions for annulment—Grounds—Infringement of essential procedural requirements—To be considered of the Court’s own motion (Art. 263 TFEU) (see paras 69, 71) |
Re:
APPEAL brought against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) of 18 July 2016, Possanzini v Commission (F‑68/15, EU:F:2016:150), seeking to have that order set aside.
Operative part
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the appeal; |
|
2. |
Orders Mr Daniele Possanzini to bear his own costs and to pay those of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) in the present proceedings. |