EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62014TA0335
Case T-335/14: Judgment of the General Court of 28 January 2016 — Davó Lledó v OHIM — Administradora y Franquicias América and Inversiones Ged (DoggiS) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community figurative mark DoggiS — Prior national figurative marks DoggiS — Prior national word marks DOGGIS and DOGGIBOX — Prior national figurative marks representing a person in the shape of a hot-dog — Additional evidence adduced for the first time before the Board of Appeal — Article 76 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Bad faith — Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Evidence adduced for the first time before the General Court)
Case T-335/14: Judgment of the General Court of 28 January 2016 — Davó Lledó v OHIM — Administradora y Franquicias América and Inversiones Ged (DoggiS) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community figurative mark DoggiS — Prior national figurative marks DoggiS — Prior national word marks DOGGIS and DOGGIBOX — Prior national figurative marks representing a person in the shape of a hot-dog — Additional evidence adduced for the first time before the Board of Appeal — Article 76 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Bad faith — Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Evidence adduced for the first time before the General Court)
Case T-335/14: Judgment of the General Court of 28 January 2016 — Davó Lledó v OHIM — Administradora y Franquicias América and Inversiones Ged (DoggiS) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community figurative mark DoggiS — Prior national figurative marks DoggiS — Prior national word marks DOGGIS and DOGGIBOX — Prior national figurative marks representing a person in the shape of a hot-dog — Additional evidence adduced for the first time before the Board of Appeal — Article 76 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Bad faith — Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Evidence adduced for the first time before the General Court)
OJ C 98, 14.3.2016, p. 36–37
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
14.3.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 98/36 |
Judgment of the General Court of 28 January 2016 — Davó Lledó v OHIM — Administradora y Franquicias América and Inversiones Ged (DoggiS)
(Case T-335/14) (1)
((Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community figurative mark DoggiS - Prior national figurative marks DoggiS - Prior national word marks DOGGIS and DOGGIBOX - Prior national figurative marks representing a person in the shape of a hot-dog - Additional evidence adduced for the first time before the Board of Appeal - Article 76 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Bad faith - Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Evidence adduced for the first time before the General Court))
(2016/C 098/47)
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: José-Manuel Davó Lledó (Cartagena, Spain) (represented by: J.-V. Gil Martí, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas, acting as Agent)
Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Administradora y Franquicias América, SA (Santiago, Chile) and Inversiones Ged Ltda (Santiago)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 13 March 2014 (Case R 1824/2013-1) concerning invalidity proceedings between, on the one hand, Administradora y Franquicias América, SA and Inversiones Ged Ltda and, on the other, Mr José-Manuel Davó Lledó
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Mr José-Manuel Davó Lledó to pay the costs. |