Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 52012XX1205(02)

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant positions given at its meeting of 26 March 2012 regarding a draft decision relating to Case COMP/39.462 (2) — Freight forwarding — Rapporteur: Slovak Republic

OJ C 375, 5.12.2012, p. 3–3 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

Date of document:
26/03/2012
Author:
Advisory Committee on Restrictive Practices and Dominant Positions
Form:
Opinion
Treaty:
Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Link
Link
Link
Select all documents mentioning this document
Link

5.12.2012   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 375/3

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant positions given at its meeting of 26 March 2012 regarding a draft decision relating to Case COMP/39.462 (2) — Freight forwarding

Rapporteur: Slovak Republic

2012/C 375/03

1.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that a fine should be imposed on the addressees of the draft decision.

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the basic amounts of the fines.

3.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the determination of the duration for the purpose of calculating the fines in the case of each of the following cartels: (a) the NES cartel; (b) the AMS cartel; (c) the CAF cartel; and (d) the PSS cartel.

4.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the specific increases of the basic amounts of the fines so as to ensure a sufficiently deterrent effect.

5.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that there are no aggravating or mitigating circumstances applicable in this case.

6.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the amounts of reductions of the fines based on the 2006 Leniency Notice.

7.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amounts of the fines.

8.

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal.
Top