EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 52024PC0178

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the CETA Joint Committee established under the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between Canada, of the one part, and the European Union and its Member States, of the other part as regards the adoption of a decision setting out supplemental rules on expedited procedures for the resolution of investment disputes between investors and states, in particular for natural persons and small and medium-sized enterprises

COM/2024/178 final

Brussels, 26.4.2024

COM(2024) 178 final

2024/0097(NLE)

Proposal for a

COUNCIL DECISION

on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the CETA Joint Committee established under the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between Canada, of the one part, and the European Union and its Member States, of the other part as regards the adoption of a decision setting out supplemental rules on expedited procedures for the resolution of investment disputes between investors and states, in particular for natural persons and small and medium-sized enterprises


EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM

1.Subject matter of the proposal

This proposal concerns the decision establishing the position to be taken on the Union's behalf in the CETA Joint Committee established under the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between Canada, of the one part, and the European Union and its Member States, of the other part, in connection with the envisaged adoption of a decision concerning supplemental rules on expedited procedures for the resolution of investment disputes between investors and states, in particular for natural persons and small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

2.Context of the proposal

2.1.The Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between Canada, of the one part, and the European Union and its Member States, of the other part

The Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between Canada, of the one part, and the European Union and its Member States, of the other part (‘the Agreement’) aims to liberalise and facilitate trade and investment, as well as to promote a closer economic relationship between the European Union and Canada (‘the Parties’). The Agreement was signed on 30 October 2016 and has been provisionally applied since 21 September 2017.

2.2.The CETA Joint Committee

The CETA Joint Committee is established under Article 26.1 of the Agreement, which provides that the CETA Joint Committee comprises representatives of the European Union and representatives of Canada and is be co-chaired by the Minister for International Trade of Canada and the Member of the European Commission responsible for Trade, or their respective designees. The CETA Joint Committee meets once a year, or at the request of a Party, and agrees on its meeting schedule and its agenda. The CETA Joint Committee is responsible for all questions concerning trade and investment between the Parties and the implementation and application of this Agreement. A Party may refer to the CETA Joint Committee any issue relating to the implementation and interpretation of this Agreement, or any other issue concerning trade and investment between the Parties.

In accordance with Article 26.3 of the Agreement, the CETA Joint Committee has the power to make decisions, by mutual consent, in respect of all matters when the Agreement so provides. The decisions made by the CETA Joint Committee are binding on the Parties, subject to the completion of any necessary internal requirements and procedures, and the Parties have to implement them.

In accordance with Rule 10.2 of the Rules of Procedure of the CETA Joint Committee and of the Specialised Committees 1 , in the period between meetings, the CETA Joint Committee may adopt decisions or recommendations by written procedure if the Parties to the Agreement decide by mutual consent. For that purpose, the text of the proposal will be circulated in writing from the co-chairs to the members of the CETA Joint Committee pursuant to Rule 7, with a time limit within which members will make known any concerns or amendments they wish to make. Adopted proposals will be communicated pursuant to Rule 7 once the time limit has elapsed and recorded in the minutes of the next meeting.

2.3.The envisaged act of the CETA Joint Committee

The CETA Joint Committee is to adopt a decision setting out supplemental rules aimed at reducing the financial burden on claimants who are natural persons or small and medium-sized enterprises pursuant to Article 8.39.6 of the Agreement (‘the envisaged act’).

The envisaged act will become binding on the Parties. Article 26.3.2 of the Agreement provides: ‘The decisions made by the CETA Joint Committee shall be binding on the Parties, subject to the completion of any necessary internal requirements and procedures, and the Parties shall implement them’.

3.Position to be taken on the Union's behalf

As provided in paragraph 6(f) of the Joint Interpretative Instrument on the Agreement, the European Union and its Member States and Canada have agreed to undertake further work on the implementation of the provisions on investment dispute resolution of the Agreement, the so-called ‘Investment Court System’. 2

Pursuant to Article 8.39.6 of the Agreement, ‘[t]he CETA Joint Committee shall consider supplemental rules aimed at reducing the financial burden on claimants who are natural persons or small and medium-sized enterprises. Such supplemental rules may, in particular, take into account the financial resources of such claimants and the amount of compensation sought’.

Paragraph 6(h) of the Joint Interpretative Instrument on the Agreement provides: ‘Canada and the European Union and its Member States are committed to monitoring the operation of all these investment rules, to addressing in a timely manner any shortcomings that may emerge and to exploring ways in which to continually improve their operation over time’. In addition, Statement No 36 by the Commission and the Council, entered into the Council minutes on the occasion of the adoption by the Council of the decision to authorise the signature of CETA on behalf of the Union, provides: ‘There will be better and easier access to this new court for the most vulnerable users, namely SMEs and private individuals. To that end: The adoption by the Joint Committee of additional rules, provided for in Article 8.39.6 of the CETA, intended to reduce the financial burden imposed on applicants who are natural persons or small and medium-sized enterprises, will be expedited so that these additional rules can be adopted as soon as possible. Irrespective of the outcome of the discussions within the Joint Committee, the Commission will propose appropriate measures of (co)-financing of actions of small and medium-sized enterprises before that Court and the provision of technical assistance. 3  

Furthermore, Opinion 1/17 of the Court of Justice of the European Union provides: ‘It is clear that, by means of that Statement, the Commission and the Council have given a commitment to implement, rapidly and adequately, Article 8.39.6 of the CETA and to ensure the accessibility of envisaged tribunals to small and medium-sized enterprises, even if work within the CETA Joint Committee were to be fruitless. That commitment is sufficient justification, in the context of the present Opinion proceedings, for the conclusion that the CETA, as an agreement envisaged, within the meaning of Article 218(11) TFEU, is compatible with the requirement that those tribunals should be accessible. To quote an explanatory sentence that precedes the statements, one of which is Statement No 36, those statements form an integral part of the context in which the Council adopts the decision to authorise the signature of CETA on behalf of the Union. They will be entered into the Council minutes on this occasion. The approval of the CETA by the Union is thus dependent on the abovementioned commitment by the Union to guarantee effective access to the envisaged tribunals for all EU investors subject to the CETA. It must be observed, in that regard, that, according to Statement No 36, this commitment forms part of the principles on the basis of which the Commission is committed to further review, without delay, of the dispute settlement mechanism … allowing sufficient time so that Member States can consider it in their ratification processes. In the light of the preceding paragraph of Statement No 36, whereby the Council and the Commission confirm that the entry into force of the provisions of Section F of Chapter Eight of the CETA will not occur before the ratification of the CETA by all the Member States, it must be held that the conclusion of the CETA by the Council is envisaged subject to the premiss that the financial accessibility of the CETA Tribunal and Appellate Tribunal for all EU investors concerned will be ensured’. 4

The envisaged act implements the abovementioned elements by including detailed rules for the resolution of investment disputes, in particular for SMEs and natural persons, to request access to an expedited procedure under the Investment Court System (Article 2). In addition, it includes detailed rules on the constitution of the Tribunal (Article 3); the first session in the expedited procedure (Article 4); the procedural schedule for the expedited procedure (Article 5); the consolidation of claims under the Decision (Article 6); mediation (Article 7) and review of the Decision (Article 8). The envisaged act will enter into force on the date of entry into force of Section F of Chapter Eight of the Agreement (Article 10).

This proposal fits in with other initiatives on the implementation of the CETA Investment Court System. Specifically, in January 2021, the Parties adopted four decisions which concerned:

rules setting out administrative and organisational matters regarding the functioning of the Appellate Tribunal in accordance with Article 8.28.7 of the Agreement;

a code of conduct for Members of the Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal and mediators in accordance with Article 8.44.2 of the Agreement;

rules for mediation for use by disputing parties in accordance with Article 8.44.3(c) of the Agreement; and

rules on the procedure for the adoption of interpretations in accordance with Articles 8.31.3 and 8.44.3(a) of the Agreement.

It is therefore appropriate to establish the position to be taken on the Union's behalf in the CETA Joint Committee on the envisaged act in order to ensure the effective implementation of the Agreement.

4.Legal basis

4.1.Procedural legal basis

4.1.1.Principles

Article 218(9) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) provides for decisions establishing ‘the positions to be adopted on the Union’s behalf in a body set up by an agreement, when that body is called upon to adopt acts having legal effects, with the exception of acts supplementing or amending the institutional framework of the agreement’.

The concept of ‘acts having legal effects’ includes acts that have legal effects by virtue of the rules of international law governing the body in question. It also includes instruments that do not have a binding effect under international law, but that are ‘capable of decisively influencing the content of the legislation adopted by the EU legislature’. 5

4.1.2.Application to the present case

The CETA Joint Committee is a body set up by an agreement, namely the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between Canada, of the one part, and the European Union and its Member States, of the other part (‘the Agreement’).

The act which the CETA Joint Committee is called upon to adopt constitutes an act having legal effects. The envisaged act will be binding on the Parties under international law in accordance with Article 26.3.2 of the Agreement.

The envisaged act does not supplement or amend the institutional framework of the Agreement.

Therefore, the procedural legal basis for the proposed decision is Article 218(9) TFEU.

4.2.Substantive legal basis

4.2.1.Principles

The substantive legal basis for a decision under Article 218(9) TFEU depends primarily on the objective and content of the envisaged act in respect of which a position is taken on the Union's behalf. If the envisaged act pursues two aims or has two components and if one of those aims or components is identifiable as the main one, whereas the other is merely incidental, the decision under Article 218(9) TFEU must be founded on a single substantive legal basis, namely that required by the main or predominant aim or component.

4.2.2.Application to the present case

The main objective and content of the envisaged act relate to the common commercial policy.

Therefore, the substantive legal bases of the proposed decision are Article 207(3) and the first subparagraph of Article 207(4) TFEU.

4.3.Conclusion

The legal bases of the proposed decision should be Article 207(3) and the first subparagraph of Article 207(4), in conjunction with Article 218(9) TFEU.

5.Authentic languages and publication of the envisaged act

As the act of the CETA Joint Committee will implement the Agreement with respect to the resolution of investment disputes between investors and states, it is appropriate to adopt it in all authentic languages of the Agreement 6 and publish it in the Official Journal of the European Union after its adoption.

2024/0097 (NLE)

Proposal for a

COUNCIL DECISION

on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the CETA Joint Committee established under the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between Canada, of the one part, and the European Union and its Member States, of the other part as regards the adoption of a decision setting out supplemental rules on expedited procedures for the resolution of investment disputes between investors and states, in particular for natural persons and small and medium-sized enterprises

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 207(3) and the first subparagraph of Article 207(4), in conjunction with Article 218(9) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Whereas:

(1)Council Decision (EU) 2017/37 7 provides for the signing on behalf of the European Union of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between Canada, of the one part, and the European Union and its Member States, of the other part (‘the Agreement’). The Agreement was signed on 30 October 2016.

(2)Council Decision (EU) 2017/38 8 provides for the provisional application of parts of the Agreement, including the part on the establishment of the CETA Joint Committee. The Agreement has been provisionally applied since 21 September 2017.

(3)Pursuant to Article 26.3.1 of the Agreement, the CETA Joint Committee shall, for the purpose of attaining the objectives of this Agreement, have the power to make decisions in respect of all matters when this Agreement so provides.

(4)Pursuant to Article 26.3.2 of the Agreement, the decisions made by the CETA Joint Committee shall be binding on the Parties, subject to the completion of any necessary internal requirements and procedures, and the Parties shall implement them.

(5)In accordance with Article 8.39.6 of the Agreement, the CETA Joint Committee is to adopt a decision setting out supplemental rules aimed at reducing the financial burden on claimants who are natural persons or small and medium-sized enterprises.

(6)It is therefore appropriate to establish the position to be taken on the Union's behalf in the CETA Joint Committee on the basis of the attached draft decision of the CETA Joint Committee on the supplemental rules on expedited procedures for the resolution of investment disputes between investors and states, in particular for natural persons and small and medium-sized enterprises in order to ensure the effective implementation of the Agreement,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the CETA Joint Committee as regards the adoption of a decision setting out supplemental rules on expedited procedures for the resolution of investment disputes between investors and states, in particular for natural persons and small and medium-sized enterprises, shall be based on the draft decision of the CETA Joint Committee attached to this Council Decision.

Article 2

1.The Decision of the CETA Joint Committee shall be adopted in all authentic languages of the Agreement.

2.The Decision adopted by the CETA Joint Committee shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels,

   For the Council

   The President

(1)    Decision 001/2018 of the CETA Joint Committee of 26 September 2018 adopting its Rules of Procedure and of the Specialised Committees.
(2)    Joint Interpretative Instrument on the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between Canada and the European Union and its Member States (OJ L 11, 14.1.2017, p. 4).
(3)    Statements to be entered in the Council minutes (OJ L 11, 14.1.2017, p. 21).
(4)    Opinion 1/17 of the Court of Justice of the European Union, 30 April 2019, ECLI:EU:C:2019:341, paragraphs 214 to 221.
(5)    Judgment of the Court of Justice of 7 October 2014, Germany v Council, C-399/12, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2258, paragraphs 61 to 64.
(6)    Pursuant to Article 30.11 (Authentic texts) of the Agreement, the Agreement is drawn up in duplicate in the Bulgarian, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Estonian, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Slovenian, Spanish and Swedish languages, each version being equally authentic.
(7)    Council Decision (EU) 2017/37 of 28 October 2016 on the signing on behalf of the European Union of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between Canada, of the one part, and the European Union and its Member States, of the other part (OJ L 11, 14.1.2017, p. 1).
(8)    Council Decision (EU) 2017/38 of 28 October 2016 on the provisional application of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between Canada, of the one part, and the European Union and its Member States, of the other part (OJ L 11, 14.1.2017, p. 1080).
Top

Brussels, 26.4.2024

COM(2024) 178 final

ANNEX

to the

Proposal for a Council Decision

on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the CETA Joint Committee established under the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between Canada, of the one part, and the European Union and its Member States, of the other part as regards the adoption of a decision setting out supplemental rules on expedited procedures for the resolution of investment disputes between investors and states, in particular for natural persons and small and medium-sized enterprises


ANNEX

Draft DECISION No [XX/2024]
OF THE CETA JOINT COMMITTEE

of…[date]

adopting supplemental rules on expedited procedures for the resolution of investment disputes between investors and states, in particular for natural persons and small and medium-sized enterprises

The CETA Joint Committee,

Having regard to Article 26.1 of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between Canada, of the one part, and the European Union and its Member States, of the other part (the "Agreement"),

Whereas Article 8.39.6 of the Agreement provides that the CETA Joint Committee shall consider supplemental rules aimed at reducing the financial burden on claimants who are natural persons or small and medium-sized enterprises,

With due consideration to the Joint Interpretative Instrument on the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between Canada and the European Union and its Member States, in which the Parties committed to monitoring the operation of the investment rules, to addressing in a timely manner any shortcomings that may emerge and to exploring ways in which to continually improve their operation over time,

Seeking to support an inclusive approach to trade and investment, which seeks to ensure that all segments of society can take advantage of the economic opportunities flowing from trade and investment,

Recalling Statement No 36 by the European Commission and the Council of the European Union on “investment protection and the Investment Court System”, entered into the minutes of the Council of the European Union in relation to the signature of the Agreement and annexed to the Council Decision (EU) 2017/37 of 28 October 2016, including the commitment that there will be better and easier access to the Agreement’s investment dispute resolution mechanism for the most vulnerable users, namely small and medium-sized enterprises and private individuals,

Having regard to Opinion C-1/17 of the Court of Justice of the European Union emphasising the importance of ensuring that the Agreement’s mechanism for the resolution of investment disputes between investors and states is financially accessible, in particular for small and medium-sized enterprises,

Recognising the importance of clear, transparent, and mutually advantageous rules to promote investment in the Parties’ respective territories,

Desiring to support small and medium-sized enterprises by enhancing their ability to participate and benefit from opportunities created by the Agreement,

Seeking to facilitate access to, and ability to benefit from, the opportunities created by the Agreement and to support the conditions for full participation in domestic, regional, and international trade and investment,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1: Scope and objective

The objective of this Decision is to increase accessibility and reduce the costs of resolving investment disputes between investors and states, in particular for natural persons or small and medium-sized enterprises by:

(a)setting out supplemental rules for investors, in particular natural persons or small and medium sized enterprises, to request access to expedited procedures, for the resolution of investment disputes under Section F (Resolution of investment disputes between investors and states) of Chapter Eight (Investment) of the Agreement; and

(b)establishing expedited procedures for the resolution of investment disputes under Section F (Resolution of investment disputes between investors and states) of Chapter Eight (Investment) of the Agreement.

Article 2: Access to the expedited procedure

1.An investor of a Party may request access to an expedited procedure for the resolution of an investment dispute in accordance with this Decision. The investor shall submit the request to the respondent and the Tribunal no later than the date of submission of a claim under Article 8.23 of the Agreement. The request shall include the following information:

(a)information concerning the ownership structure of the investor, and if applicable, the locally established enterprise on whose behalf the claim is submitted, or any other affiliated persons;

(b)the most recent financial statements of the investor and if applicable, the locally established enterprise on whose behalf the claim is submitted;

(c)proof that the investor is a person of a Party; and

(d)information concerning the number of employees of the investor and, if applicable, the locally established enterprise on whose behalf the claim is submitted.

The investor is also strongly encouraged to provide any information on why it considers the expedited procedure to be appropriate under the circumstances of the claim.

2.The respondent shall give sympathetic consideration to a request under paragraph 1 if the investor is a natural person or small or medium-sized enterprise, and the amount of damages claimed does not exceed the equivalent of SDR 40 000 000. In considering whether the investor is a small or medium-sized enterprise, the respondent shall take into consideration the size of the investor as an enterprise and, if the claim is submitted on behalf of an enterprise, the size of that enterprise, including the following factors: the number of employees, annual turnover, ownership structure, and any other factors that the respondent considers relevant. 1  

3.Prior to taking a decision on a request under paragraph 1, the respondent may request additional information from the investor. To the extent that the respondent identifies a potential concern regarding the suitability of the expedited procedure, it may inform the investor and request any necessary information to address that concern. The disputing parties may discuss whether that concern can be addressed by extending the timelines set out in Articles 4 and 5 or by taking any other agreed action.

4.The respondent shall notify the claimant and the Tribunal, in writing, of its decision regarding a request under paragraph 1 within 45 days of the submission of the claim under Article 8.23 of the Agreement, unless the disputing parties agree to a different timeline for the notification. In the event that the respondent rejects the request, it shall provide a justification for its decision in its notification to the claimant.

5.In accordance with Article 8.38 of the Agreement, the respondent shall promptly notify the non-disputing Party of a request made by an investor under paragraph 1 and of its decision under paragraph 4.

6.If the disputing parties agree to an expedited procedure, Section F (Resolution of investment disputes between investors and states) of the Agreement, as modified by this Decision, applies to the dispute.

Article 3: Constitution of the Tribunal

1.A claim subject to an expedited procedure pursuant to Article 2(6) shall be heard by a sole Member of the Tribunal.

2.The sole Member of the Tribunal shall be appointed by the President of the Tribunal from the third country nationals, in accordance with the principles outlined in Article 8.27.7 of the Agreement, as modified by this Decision, within 30 days of the notification of a decision of the respondent consenting to a request under Article 2(4).

3.The sole Member of the Tribunal shall ensure his or her availability in respect of the expedited timelines set out in Article 5.

4.The sole Member of the Tribunal shall abide by Decision No 001/2021 of the Committee on Services and Investment of 29 January 2021 adopting a code of conduct for Members of the Tribunal, Members of the Appellate Tribunal and mediators.

5.If the dispute falls under Article 13.21.1 of the Agreement, a sole Member of the Tribunal shall be selected, in accordance with the principles outlined in Article 8.27.7 and Article 13.21.2 of the Agreement, as modified by this Decision.

Article 4: First session in expedited procedure

1.The sole Member of the Tribunal shall hold a first session within 30 days of the constitution of the Tribunal under Article 3.

2.The sole Member of the Tribunal shall hold the first session by videoconference, telephone, or similar means of communication, unless both disputing parties and the sole Member of the Tribunal agree it shall be held in person.

Article 5: Procedural schedule for expedited procedure

1.Unless the disputing parties agree otherwise, the following schedule for written submissions and the hearing shall apply in the expedited procedure:

(a)the claimant shall file, within 90 days of the first session, a principal submission on the merits, such as a memorial, of no more than 150 pages;

(b)the respondent shall file, within 90 days of the claimant’s filing of its principal submission on the merits pursuant to subparagraph (a), a principal submission on the merits, such as a counter-memorial, of no more than 150 pages;

(c)the claimant shall file, within 90 days of the respondent’s filing of its principal submission on the merits pursuant to subparagraph (b), a reply of no more than 100 pages;

(d)the respondent shall file, within 90 days of the claimant’s filing of the reply pursuant to subparagraph (c), a rejoinder of no more than 100 pages;

(e)the non-disputing Party may file, within 60 days of the respondent’s filing of the rejoinder pursuant to subparagraph (d), a written submission regarding the interpretation of the Agreement pursuant to Article 8.38.2 of the Agreement;

(f)the sole Member of the Tribunal shall hold a hearing within 120 days of the respondent’s filing of the rejoinder pursuant to subparagraph (d);

(g)each disputing party shall file a statement of costs within 30 days of the last day of the hearing referred to in subparagraph (f); and

(h)the sole Member of the Tribunal shall render the award as soon as possible, and in any event within 180 days of the last day of the hearing referred to in subparagraph (f).

2.If the claimant fails to take any steps in the proceeding, the sole Member of the Tribunal may grant the claimant a grace period not exceeding 30 days. If the grace period is not granted, or the claimant fails to take steps within that time period, the claimant is deemed to have withdrawn its claim and to have discontinued the proceedings, in accordance with Article 8.35 of the Agreement, as modified by this Decision.

3.If the respondent fails to take any steps in the proceeding, the sole Member of the Tribunal may grant the respondent a grace period not exceeding 30 days. If the grace period is not granted, or the respondent fails to take steps within that time period, the claimant may request that the sole Member of the Tribunal address the questions submitted to it and render an award.

4.At the request of a disputing party, the sole Member of the Tribunal may grant limited requests for specifically identifiable documents relevant to the case and material to its outcome that the requesting disputing party knows, or has good cause to believe, exist and are in the possession, custody or control of the other disputing party, and shall adjust the schedule under paragraph 1 as appropriate.

5.The sole Member of the Tribunal may, after consultation with the disputing parties, limit the number, length, or scope of written submissions or written witness evidence (both fact witnesses and experts).

6.The sole Member of the Tribunal may, following a joint request by the disputing parties, decide the dispute solely on the basis of the documents submitted by the disputing parties, with no hearing and no or limited examination of witnesses or experts. If the sole Member of the Tribunal holds a hearing under paragraph 1(f), the sole Member of the Tribunal may conduct the hearing by videoconference, telephone, or similar means of communication.

7.The sole Member of the Tribunal shall, following a joint request by the disputing parties, and no later than the date of filing of the respondent’s principal submission on the merits referred to in paragraph 1(b), decide that this Decision no longer applies to the claim.

8.The sole Member of the Tribunal may, at the request of the claimant, and no later than the date of filing of the respondent’s principal submission on the merits referred to in paragraph 1(b), decide that this Decision no longer applies to the claim. The claimant shall bear the costs of proceedings incurred by the respondent in the expedited procedure.

9.The sole Member of the Tribunal may, at the request of the respondent, and no later than the date of filing of the respondent’s principal submission on the merits referred to in paragraph 1(b), decide that this Decision no longer applies to the claim only if there is any false or misleading information provided by the claimant that is material to the respondent’s decision to consent to the expedited procedure under Article 2(4). In that case, the claimant shall bear the costs of proceedings incurred by the respondent in the expedited procedure.

10.If, pursuant to paragraph 8 or 9, the sole Member of the Tribunal decides that this Decision no longer applies to the claim, and unless the disputing parties agree otherwise, the sole Member of the Tribunal appointed pursuant to Article 3 shall be appointed as presiding Member of the Tribunal constituted under Section F (Resolution of investment disputes between investors and states) of Chapter Eight (Investment) of the Agreement. The new Tribunal constituted under Section F shall decide, after consultation with the disputing parties, how to take into consideration the status of the proceeding started under this Decision.

11.In all matters concerning the expedited procedure that are not expressly provided for in this Decision or in the Agreement, the disputing parties shall endeavour to agree on the applicable procedural rules. If the disputing parties do not agree on the applicable procedural rules, the sole Member of the Tribunal may decide on the matter.

12.In accordance with Article 8.28 of the Agreement, a disputing party may appeal an award rendered by the sole Member of the Tribunal under paragraph 1(h). The conduct of appeals and procedures for referring issues back to the Tribunal for adjustment of the award, as appropriate, shall be governed by Article 8.28 of the Agreement and Decision No 001/2021 of the CETA Joint Committee of 29 January 2021 setting out the administrative and organisational matters regarding the functioning of the Appellate Tribunal.

Article 6: Consolidation of claims under this Decision

When two or more claims subject to an expedited procedure pursuant to Article 2(6) have a question of law or fact in common and arise out of the same events or circumstances, a disputing party shall give sympathetic consideration to a request for consolidation of those claims. If all disputing parties agree, those claims shall be consolidated in accordance with Article 8.43 of the Agreement.

Article 7: Mediation

1.A respondent shall give sympathetic consideration to a request for mediation if the investor is a natural person or a small or medium-sized enterprise, and the amount of damages claimed does not exceed the equivalent of SDR 40 000 000.

2.In considering whether the investor is a small or medium-sized enterprise, the respondent shall take into consideration the size of the investor as an enterprise and, if the claim is submitted on behalf of an enterprise, the size of that enterprise, including the following factors: the number of employees, annual turnover, ownership structure, and any other factors that the respondent considers relevant. 2 The respondent may request additional information from the investor to facilitate its consideration of whether the investor is a small or medium-sized enterprise.

3.Article 8.20 of the Agreement and Decision No 002/2021 of the Committee on Services and Investment of 29 January 2021 adopting rules for mediation for use by disputing parties in investment disputes, apply to a mediation agreed to by the disputing parties under paragraph 1.

Article 8: Review of this Decision

The CETA Joint Committee may periodically review the functioning of this Decision, including the considerations referred to in Articles 2(2) and 7(2), consider other developments on enhancing the ability of natural persons or small and medium-sized enterprises to participate and benefit from opportunities created by international trade and investment, and revise this Decision, as appropriate.

Article 9 - Authentic texts

This Decision is drawn up in duplicate in the Bulgarian, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Estonian, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Slovenian, Spanish and Swedish languages, each version being equally authentic.

Article 10 - Entry into force

This Decision shall be published. It shall enter into force on the date of entry into force of Section F (Resolution of investment disputes between investors and states) of Chapter Eight (Investment) of the Agreement, subject to the Parties’ exchange of written notifications, through diplomatic channels, certifying that they have completed the necessary internal requirements and procedures.

Done at … on …

(1)    In the case where the respondent is the European Union or a Member State of the European Union, the Commission Recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of “micro, small and medium-sized enterprises” (2003/361/EC), may be taken into account when considering whether the investor or the enterprise on whose behalf the claim is submitted, as applicable, is a small or medium-sized enterprise.
(2)    In the case where the respondent is the European Union or a Member State of the European Union, the Commission Recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises” (2003/361/EC), may be taken into account when considering whether the investor or the enterprise on whose behalf the claim is submitted, as applicable, is a small or medium-sized enterprise.
Top