Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 52011XX1007(01)

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant position given at its meeting of 22 November 2010 regarding a draft decision relating to Case COMP/39.309 (1) — LCD — Rapporteur: Denmark

OJ C 295, 7.10.2011, p. 2–2 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

Date of document:
22/11/2010
Author:
Advisory Committee on Restrictive Practices and Dominant Positions
Form:
Opinion
Treaty:
Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union , Agreement on the European Economic Area
Legal basis:
Link
Link
Link
Select all documents mentioning this document
Link

7.10.2011   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 295/2

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant position given at its meeting of 22 November 2010 regarding a draft decision relating to Case COMP/39.309 (1) — LCD

Rapporteur: Denmark

2011/C 295/02

1.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission assessment of the facts as agreements and/or concerted practices within the meaning of Article 101 of the TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement.

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees that the complex of agreements and/or concerted practices constitutes a single and continuous cartel infringement in the sector of Liquid Crystal Display panels for TV, notebook and monitor application for the time frame in which it existed.

3.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission that the complex of agreements and/or concerted practices had the object and effect of restricting competition.

4.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission assessment on the duration of the infringement for each addressee.

5.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission draft decision as regards the conclusion that the agreements and/or concerted practices between the addressees were capable of having an appreciable effect upon trade between EU Member States and between contracting parties of the EEA.

6.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission draft decision as regards the addressees of the decision, specifically with reference to imputation of liability to parent companies of the groups concerned.

7.

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Top