Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 52011XX0209(01)

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant positions given at its meeting of 12 June 2008 concerning a draft decision relating to Case COMP/39.180 — Aluminium fluoride — Rapporteur: Austria

OJ C 40, 9.2.2011, p. 19–19 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

Date of document:
12/06/2008
Author:
Advisory Committee on Restrictive Practices and Dominant Positions
Form:
Opinion
Treaty:
Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Legal basis:
Link
Link
Link
Select all documents mentioning this document
Link

9.2.2011   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 40/19

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant positions given at its meeting of 12 June 2008 concerning a draft decision relating to Case COMP/39.180 — Aluminium fluoride

Rapporteur: Austria

2011/C 40/10

1.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission's assessment of the facts as an agreement and/or concerted practice within the meaning of Article 81 of the EC Treaty and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement.

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission's assessment of the product and the geographic area affected by the cartel.

3.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission's assessment that the cartel constitutes a single and continuous infringement.

4.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission's assessment as regards the addressees of the draft decision, specifically with reference to imputation of liability to parent companies of the groups concerned.

5.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission that a fine should be imposed on the addressees of the draft decision.

6.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission's assessment of the applications made under the 2002 Leniency Notice.

7.

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its Opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Top