EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 52008XX0326(01)
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its 423rd meeting on 9 February 2007 concerning a draft decision in Case COMP/E-1/38.823 — Elevators and Escalators
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its 423rd meeting on 9 February 2007 concerning a draft decision in Case COMP/E-1/38.823 — Elevators and Escalators
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its 423rd meeting on 9 February 2007 concerning a draft decision in Case COMP/E-1/38.823 — Elevators and Escalators
OJ C 75, 26.3.2008, p. 14–14
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
26.3.2008 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 75/14 |
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its 423rd meeting on 9 February 2007 concerning a draft decision in Case COMP/E-1/38.823 — Elevators and Escalators
(2008/C 75/07)
1. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission assessment of the product and the geographic scope of the agreements and/or concerted practices contained in the draft decision. |
2. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission legal assessment of the facts as agreements and/or concerted practices within the meaning of Article 81(1) of the EC Treaty. |
3. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission view that the infringements refer to four complex and continuous infringements. |
4. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission that the agreements and/or concerted practices have as their object and/or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition within the common market. |
5. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission that the agreements and/or concerted practices have appreciably affected trade between Member States. |
6. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission draft decision as regarding the addressees of the decision. |
7. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission as regarding the duration of the infringements and the application of limitation periods. |
8. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission's method of calculation of the fines. |
9. |
The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union. |
10. |
The Advisory Committee asks the Commission to take into account all the other points raised during the discussion. |