EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 52008XX0112(01)
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its 418th meeting on 20 November 2006 concerning a draft decision in Case COMP/F/38.638 — BR/ESBR
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its 418th meeting on 20 November 2006 concerning a draft decision in Case COMP/F/38.638 — BR/ESBR
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its 418th meeting on 20 November 2006 concerning a draft decision in Case COMP/F/38.638 — BR/ESBR
OJ C 7, 12.1.2008, p. 7–7
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 20/11/2006
- Author:
- Advisory Committee on Restrictive Practices and Dominant Positions
- Form:
- Opinion
- Treaty:
- Agreement on the European Economic Area , Treaty establishing the European Community
- Legal basis:
-
- 12006E081 - P1
- 21994A0103(01) - A53P1
- Link
- Link
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
- Subject matter:
- Directory code:
-
- 08.20.10.00 Competition policy / Restrictive practices / Prohibited agreements
|
12.1.2008 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 7/7 |
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its 418th meeting on 20 November 2006 concerning a draft decision in Case COMP/F/38.638 — BR/ESBR
(2008/C 7/04)
|
1. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the legal assessment made by the Commission, notably with the legal qualification of the facts as agreements and/or concerted practices within the meaning of Article 81(1) of the EC Treaty and Article 53(1) of the EEA Agreement. |
|
2. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the agreements and/or concerted practices have as object a restriction of competition. |
|
3. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission's assessment on the duration of infringement, as being from 20 May 1996 until 28 November 2002. |
|
4. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission's draft decision as regards the addressees of the decision, specifically with reference to imputation of liability to parent companies of the groups concerned. |
|
5. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that a fine should be imposed on addressees of the draft decision. |
|
6. |
Advisory committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union. |
|
7. |
The Advisory Committee asks the Commission to take into account all the other points raised during the discussion. |
